Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

La 4e de couv. indique : "La formation à juge unique du tribunal correctionnel s'est développée depuis les années 1970. Les enjeux d'accélération du procès pénal et d'économie des ressources ont présidé à cet essor ; ils justifient désormais de le mettre en concurrence avec de nouveaux modes de poursuites plus performants. Analysant les impacts de la loi du 23 mars 2019, cette étude brosse le portrait d'un juge isolé et affaibli par la complexité croissante de son office. En l'état actuel des pratiques et des cultures professionnelles, son déclin est inévitable. A l'appui de témoignages et d'observations menées en juridiction, ces développements s'attaquent au vice originel affectant le juge unique : sa solitude. Ils proposent un regard nouveau sur l'indépendance des magistrats du siège pour défendre une collégialité rénovée, fondée sur un réseau d'acteurs et un dialogue permanent entre les membres du système. Le lecteur est ainsi invité à dépasser les postures traditionnelles sur les notions d'indépendance, d'impartialité et de collégialité, pour se recentrer sur l'humain et les pratiques, au nom du bien-être des magistrats, de la qualité de la justice et de l'intérêt des justiciables."

Justice --- Administration --- Juges uniques --- Procédure pénale --- Collégialité (droit) --- 1990-.... --- Judges --- Juges --- Criminal procedure --- Collégialité (Droit)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Fitzmaurice and the World Crisis examines the impact of the legal advice of G.G. Fitzmaurice on the making of British Foreign Policy during the key phases of the developing World Crisis, from 1932 to 1945, in relations with Japan and Germany. Particular attention is given to whether relations with Germany were defined in terms of classical power politics or in a new language of the rule of law in international society. The main themes highlight Fitzmaurice's contribution to the shaping of major issues and illustrate the breadth of scope in the work of the legal adviser: the Manchurian Crisis; Anglo-German relations in the 1930s; the concluding of the Anglo-Polish Treaty of 1939; economic warfare and the laws of war at sea (1939-43); debate surrounding the nature of Germany's surrender and the drafting of armistice terms. The book breaks new ground with respect to the basic technical crafts of the international lawyer. It shows how the skills of the diplomatic historian, working with unpublished Foreign Office archives, are essential to unravelling the true legal practice of a state as an element in the evolution of customary international law. The aim is not simply to unearth and present, in a minimally edited form, the legal opinions of Fitzmaurice, but also to assess his impact within the Foreign Office. It concludes that the role of the individual international lawyer in government institutions is potentially very significant. However, his influence depends not simply on the stubbornness with which he holds onto his professional expertise, but also on his moral vision and sensitivity towards the complexities of the context in which he has the potential to shape events.

Avis des juges --- Collégialité (Droit) --- Collégialité des juges --- Collégialité judiciaire --- Délibérations des juges --- Judicial opinions --- Juridiction collégiale --- Opinions [Judicial ] --- Opinions judiciaires --- Rechterlijke meningen --- International law --- Fitzmaurice, Gerald, --- Fitzmaurice, Gerald --- Cases --- International law - Great Britain - Sources. --- Diplomatic relations --- Law of nations --- Nations, Law of --- Public international law --- Law --- Sources --- Great Britain. --- British Foreign Office --- بريتانياى كبير. --- Great Britain --- Foreign relations

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book provides insight into modern collective judicial decision-making. Courts all over the world sit in panels of several judges, yet the processes by which these judges produce the courts' decisions differ markedly. Judges from some of the world's most notable judicial bodies, in both the civilian and the common law tradition and from supra-/international courts, share their experiences and reflect on the challenges to which their collective endeavour gives rise. They address matters such as the question of panel constitution, the operation of rapporteur systems, pre- and post-hearing conferences, the hearing procedure itself, the nature of the interaction between the judicial panel and parties' advocates, the extent to which a unitary judgment of the court or at least a single majority judgment is required or deemed desirable, and how it is ultimately arrived at through different voting mechanisms. The judicial views are supplemented by a number of academic commentaries. Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective serves as an inspiration for future court design. Sir Jack Beatson (formerly Court of Appeal of England and Wales) Thomas von Danwitz (Court of Justice of the European Union) Matthew Dyson (University of Oxford) Harry T Edwards (United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit) Wolfgang Ernst (University of Oxford) Kevin Garnett QC (formerly Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office) Msgr Markus Graulich (Pontifical Council for Legislative Text) Beate Gsell (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich) Birke Häcker (University of Oxford) Dominique Hascher (Cour de cassation) Sir Launcelot Henderson (Court of Appeal of England and Wales) Rchard Hyland (Rutgers Law School) Susan Kiefel AC (High Court of Australia) Georg Kodek (Austrian Supreme Court) James Lee (King's College London) Sir Keith Lindblom (Court of Appeal of England and Wales) Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff (formerly German Federal Constitutional Court) Theodor Meron (International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals) Angelika Nussberger (formerly European Court of Human Rights) Akira Ojima (Chief Judicial Research Official, Supreme Court of Japan) Naoki Onishi (Otsu District Court, Japan) Christos Ravanides (Office of Legal Affairs, United Nations) Lord Reed of Allermuir (Supreme Court of the United Kingdom) Thomas Rüfner (University of Trier) Johanna Schmidt-Räntsch (German Federal Court of Justice) Thomas Stadelmann (Swiss Supreme Court) Wolfgang Ernst is Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Oxford, and Fellow of All Souls College.Birke Häcker is the Professor of Comparative Law, University of Oxford, and Fellow of Brasenose College.

Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Comparative law --- Law of civil procedure --- Droit comparé. --- Droit --- Décision de groupe. --- Collégialité (droit) --- Prise de décision. --- BPB9999 --- BPB2011 --- vergelijkende studie --- besluitvorming --- judge --- gjyqtar --- sudca --- giudice --- Richter --- rechter --- kohtunik --- съдия --- судија --- judecător --- bíró --- δικαστής --- juge --- juez --- imħallef --- dommer --- sędzia --- soudce --- juiz --- tuomari --- sudac --- tiesnesis --- sodnik --- teisėjas --- domare --- judecător pentru minori --- undersøgelsesdommer --- судија на Врховен суд --- Untersuchungsrichter --- sbor soudců --- zittende magistratuur --- судија на Основен суд --- soudce kompetentní ve věcech dětí a mladistvých --- trup gjykues --- juge pour enfants --- tardytojas --- juiz de instrução --- giudice minorile --- rechter-commissaris --- juez de primera instancia --- δικαστής ανηλίκων --- tiesnesis referents --- Richteramt --- ettekandekohtunik --- magjistër për të mitur --- Richterschaft --- kinderrechter --- juiz de intervenção --- судија на Управен суд --- Jugendrichter --- domarkåren --- undersökningsdomare --- судија на Апелациски суд --- giudice istruttore --- dommerstand --- goda tiesnesis --- zbor sudcov --- magistrature assise --- magisztrátus --- soudní čekatel --- judicatura --- vyšetřující soudce --- juez de instrucción --- nepilnamečių bylų teismo teisėjas --- Richterstand --- judecător de instrucție --- juge d'instruction --- истражен судија --- the bench --- juez de distrito --- indipendenza del giudice --- ανακριτής --- Ermittlungsrichter --- juez de menores --- teisėjai --- examining magistrate --- magjistër hetues --- lapsia koskevia oikeudellisia asioita käsittelevä tuomari --- tuomarikunta --- children's magistrate --- kohtunikkond --- vyšetrujúci sudca --- magistratura giudicante --- sudca pre deti a mladistvých --- судија на Уставен суд --- istražni sudac --- judecător de primă instanță --- onderzoeksrechter --- rannsakningsdomare --- tutkintatuomari --- bírói testület --- lyginamoji studija --- упоредна студија --- estudio comparativo --- jämförande studie --- studju komparattiv --- vergleichende Studie --- poredbena studija --- studia porównawcze --- võrdlev uurimus --- συγκριτική μελέτη --- összehasonlító tanulmány --- sammenlignende undersøgelse --- porovnávacia štúdia --- étude comparative --- salīdzināmā pētniecība --- primerjalna študija --- vertaileva tutkimus --- studim krahasues --- studiu comparativ --- studio comparativo --- estudo comparativo --- srovnávací studie --- comparative study --- споредбена студија --- сравнително изследване --- komparativna studija --- компаративна студија --- komparativní studie --- podejmowanie decyzji --- Entscheidungsprozess --- доношење одлуке --- prise de décision --- донесување одлуки --- toma de decisiones --- взимане на решение --- határozathozatal --- decision-making --- teħid ta’ deċiżjonijiet --- vendim-marrje --- odločanje --- päätöksenteko --- otsuste tegemine --- beslutsfattande --- rozhodovanie --- processo decisionale --- tomada de decisão --- donošenje odluke --- beslutningstagning --- lēmuma pieņemšana --- sprendimų priėmimas --- λήψη απόφασης --- luarea deciziilor --- rozhodování --- beslutningsproces --- estrutura funcional --- beslutsprocess --- processus décisionnel --- döntéshozatali folyamat --- Beschlußfassung --- päätöksentekoprosessi --- decision-making process --- διαδικασία λήψης αποφάσεων --- beslutsförlopp --- proces i vendimmarrjes --- proceso decisorio --- határozathozatali eljárás --- processus de décision --- otsustamisprotsess --- besluitvormingsproces --- procedura di decisione --- processo decisorio --- beslutsprocedur --- lēmuma pieņemšanas process --- rozhodovací proces --- besluitvormingsprocedure --- proceso de toma de decisiones --- процес на одлучување --- procédure de décision --- proces de luare a deciziilor --- presa di decisioni --- proces odlučivanja --- Beschlussfassung --- processo di decisione --- beslutningsprocedure --- Beschlussverfahren --- proceso de decisión --- одлучување --- processo de decisão --- döntéshozatal --- Entscheidungsfindung --- odlučivanje --- Judicial process --- Judges --- Court administration --- breitheamh --- cinnteoireacht --- staidéar comparáideach --- Droit comparé --- Processus judiciare --- Juges --- Tribunaux --- Administration --- Collégialité (Droit) --- Court management --- Courts --- Management --- Decision making, Judicial --- Judicial behavior --- Judicial decision making --- Law --- Procedure (Law) --- Alcaldes --- Cadis --- Chief justices --- Chief magistrates --- Justices --- Magistrates --- Psychological aspects --- Interpretation and construction --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Officials and employees