Listing 1 - 10 of 49 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Friede. --- Internationales Recht. --- Krieg. --- Völkerrecht. --- Geneva Convention --- Declaration of London
Choose an application
Choose an application
War --- Relief Work --- International Cooperation --- World War I --- Relief of sick and wounded --- American Red Cross. --- Geneva Convention --- Geneva Convention --- Revision. --- Europe.
Choose an application
Prisoners of war --- Prisonniers de guerre --- Geneva. --- Geneva Convention, Aug. 22, 1864 --- Revisions
Choose an application
How do states know what they want? Asking how interests are defined and how changes in them are accommodated, Martha Finnemore shows the fruitfulness of a constructivist approach to international politics. She draws on insights from sociological institutionalism to develop a systemic approach to state interests and state behavior by investigating an international structure not of power but of meaning and social value. An understanding of what states want, she argues, requires insight into the international social structure of which they are a part. States are embedded in dense networks of transnational and international social relations that shape their perceptions and their preferences in consistent ways. Finnemore focuses on international organizations as one important component of social structure and investigates the ways in which they redefine state preferences. She details three examples in different issue areas. In state structure, she discusses UNESCO and the changing international organization of science. In security, she analyzes the role of the Red Cross and the acceptance of the Geneva Convention rules of war. Finally, she focuses on the World Bank and explores the changing definitions of development in the Third World. Each case shows how international organizations socialize states to accept new political goals and new social values in ways that have lasting impact on the conduct of war, the workings of the international political economy, and the structure of states themselves.
Choose an application
"The Fourth Geneva Convention, signed on 12th August 1949, defines necessary humanitarian protections for civilians during armed conflict and occupation. One-hundred-and-ninety-six countries are signatories to the Geneva Conventions, and this particular facet has laid the foundations for all subsequent humanitarian global law. How did the world - against seemingly insurmountable odds - draft and legislate this landmark in humanitarian international law? The Fourth Geneva Convention for Civilians draws on archival research across seven countries to bring together the Cold War interventions, founding motives and global idealisms that shaped its conception. Gilad Ben-Nun draws on the three key principles that the convention brought about to consider the recent events where its application has either been successfully applied or circumvented, from the 2009 Gaza War, the war crimes tribunal in the former Yugoslavia and Nicaragua vs. the United States to the contemporary conflict in Syria. Weaving historical archival research, a grounding in the concepts of international law, and insightful analysis of recent events, this book will appeal to a broad range of students, academics and legal practitioners."--
Choose an application
The application and interpretation of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their two Additional Protocols of 1977 have developed significantly in the seventy years since the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) first published its Commentaries on these important humanitarian treaties. To promote a better understanding of, and respect for, this body of law, the ICRC commissioned a comprehensive update of its original Commentaries, of which this is the third volume. The Third Convention, relative to the treatment of prisoners of war and their protections, takes into account developments in the law and practice in the past seven decades to provide up-to-date interpretations of the Convention. The new Commentary has been reviewed by humanitarian law practitioners and academics from around the world. This new Commentary will be an essential tool for anyone involved with international humanitarian law.
Prisoners of war --- War (International law) --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War --- Hostilities --- International law --- Neutrality --- Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War --- Third Geneva Convention --- Convention de Genève relative au traitement des prisonniers de guerre --- Geneva Conventions
Choose an application
Since the mid-19th century military powers and various writers have tried to define the notion of belligerent occupation and, in particular, the beginning thereof. There are many situations in which a state of occupation is controversial or even denied. When is control so effective that an invasion turns into a state of belligerent occupation? What is the minimum area of a territory that can be occupied; a town, a hamlet, a house or what about a hill taken by the armed forces? This paper examines what seems to be an important gap of the Fourth Geneva Convention: contrary to the Hague Regulations of 1907 it does not provide a definition of belligerent occupation. It is argued that the Fourth Geneva Convention follows its own rules of applicability and that therefore the provisions relative to occupied territories apply in accordance with the “functional beginning” of belligerent occupation approach from the moment that a protected person finds him or herself in the hands of the enemy. Henry Dunant Prize 2010 from the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights (ADH Geneva)
International Law --- Law, Politics & Government --- Treaties, International --- Geneva Convention Fourth (1949) --- belligerent occupation --- protection of civilians --- dispute settlement --- conflict security and peacebuilding --- International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) --- humanitarian action
Choose an application
This work offers a comparative analysis of state practice with regard to the Geneva Conventions. It seeks to answer three questions of critical importance to understanding their role and impact: (1) How have the Geneva Conventions been incorporated into the laws and practices governing armed forces in particular countries? (2) In what ways has the Geneva regime constrained the behavior of states facing situations such as guerrilla warfare and terrorism, where one would expect the Conventions to come under the greatest pressure? (3) What factors have contributed to the successes and failures of the Geneva Conventions to protect human rights in wartime?
War (International law) --- Military law. --- Geneva Conventions --- Armed Forces --- Law, Military --- Military administration --- National security --- Hostilities --- International law --- Neutrality --- Law and legislation --- Conventions de Genève --- Geneva Convention --- Konvensi-Konvensi Jenewa --- Zhenevskite konvent︠s︡ii
Choose an application
Are armed drones a permissible and harmless military technology from the point of view of international humanitarian law? With this question, the author puts the much-discussed armed drones to the test of Article 36 of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, which imposes on states an obligation to test new weapons and means of warfare. Furthermore, the work deals with three controversial political theses around the effects of drone technology on modern warfare and explains what relevance these have from the perspective of international humanitarian law. The present work thus gives a complete view of the question of the admissibility of armed drones raised above. Handelt es sich bei bewaffneten Drohnen um eine aus Sicht des humanitären Völkerrechts zulässige und unbedenkliche Militärtechnologie? Mit dieser Frage stellt die Autorin die viel diskutierten bewaffneten Drohnen auf den Prüfstand des Art. 36 des Ersten Zusatzprotokolls der Genfer Konventionen, welcher den Staaten eine Prüfpflicht neuer Waffen und Mittel der Kriegführung auferlegt. Im Weiteren befasst sich das Werk mit drei kontroversen politischen Thesen rund um die Auswirkungen der Drohnentechnologie auf die moderne Kriegführung und legt dar, welche Relevanz diese aus der Sicht des humanitären Völkerrechts haben. Das vorliegende Werk gibt somit eine vollständige Sicht auf die oben aufgeworfene Frage der Zulässigkeit bewaffneter Drohnen.
International law --- Geneva Convention; Drones; Principle of distinction; International humanitarian law; Drone war; Martens Clause; Targeted killing; Weapons testing; Genfer Kovention; Drohnen; Unterscheidungsgrundsatz; Humanitäres Völkerrecht; Dronenkrieg; Martens'sche Klausel; Targeted Killing; Waffenprüfung
Listing 1 - 10 of 49 | << page >> |
Sort by
|