Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Drawing on hundreds of newly released judicial archives and court cases, this book analyzes the communist judicial system in China from its founding period to the death of Mao Zedong. It argues that the communist judicial system was built when the CCP was engaged in a life-or-death struggle with the GMD, meaning that the overriding aim of the judicial system was, from the outset, to safeguard the Party against both internal and external adversaries. This fundamental insecurity and perennial fear of loss of power obsessed the Party throughout the era of Mao and beyond, prompting it to launch numerous political campaigns, which forced communist judicial cadres to choose between upholding basic legal norms and maintaining Party order. In doing all of this, The Communist Judicial System in China, 1927-1976: Building on Fear fills a major lacuna in our understanding of communist-era China.

Justice, Administration of --- Law --- History --- China --- Politics and government --- Administration of justice --- Courts --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- Law and legislation --- Fear, Communist Judicial System, Mao's China.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The institutional landscape of local dispute resolution in Bangladesh is rich: it includes the traditional process of shalish, longstanding and impressive civil society efforts to improve on shalish, and a somewhat less-explored provision for gram adalat or village courts. Based on a nationally representative survey, qualitative evidence from focus groups, and a telephone survey of 40 Union Parishad chairpersons (a little less than 1 percent of the total Union Parishads), it provides both an empirical mapping of local conflict and justice and pointers to possible policy reforms. It suggests a number of opportunities for strengthening local justice and argues that the village courts may pose a useful bridge between Bangladesh's informal and formal justice institutions.

Gender and Law --- Judicial System Reform --- Justice --- Law and Development --- Legal Institutions of the Market Economy --- Legal Products --- Local conflict --- Local dispute resolution --- Policy reforms --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Qualitative evidence

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Optimism about the use of laws, constitutions, and rights to achieve social change has never been higher among practitioners. But the academic literature is skeptical that courts can direct resources toward the poor. This paper develops a nuanced account in which not all courts are the same. Countries and policy areas characterized by judicial decisions with broader applicability tend to avoid the potential anti-poor bias of courts, whereas areas dominated by individual litigation and individualized effects are less likely to have pro-poor outcomes. Using data on social and economic rights cases in five countries, the authors estimate the potential distributive impact of litigation by examining whether the poor are over or under-represented among the beneficiaries of litigation, relative to their share of the population. They find that the impact of courts varies considerably across the cases, but is positive and pro-poor in two of the five countries (India and South Africa), distribution-neutral in two others (Indonesia and Brazil), and sharply anti-poor in Nigeria. Overall, the results of litigation are much more positive for the poor than conventional wisdom would suggest.

Courts --- Education --- Equity --- Gender and Law --- Health --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Human rights --- Judicial System Reform --- Labor Policies --- Law and Development --- Population Policies --- Poverty --- Social policy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The institutional landscape of local dispute resolution in Bangladesh is rich: it includes the traditional process of shalish, longstanding and impressive civil society efforts to improve on shalish, and a somewhat less-explored provision for gram adalat or village courts. Based on a nationally representative survey, qualitative evidence from focus groups, and a telephone survey of 40 Union Parishad chairpersons (a little less than 1 percent of the total Union Parishads), it provides both an empirical mapping of local conflict and justice and pointers to possible policy reforms. It suggests a number of opportunities for strengthening local justice and argues that the village courts may pose a useful bridge between Bangladesh's informal and formal justice institutions.

Gender and Law --- Judicial System Reform --- Justice --- Law and Development --- Legal Institutions of the Market Economy --- Legal Products --- Local conflict --- Local dispute resolution --- Policy reforms --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Qualitative evidence

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Bihar is widely regarded as one of India's poorest and most divided states. It has also been the site of many social movements that have left indelible marks on the state's politics and identity. Little is currently known about how structural inequalities have affected the functioning of formal systems of justice in the state. This paper uses a novel dataset of more than one million cases filed at the Patna high court between 2009 and 2019 together with a variety of supplementary data to analyze the role of religion, caste and gender in the high court of Bihar. The analysis finds that the courts are not representative of the Bihari population. Muslims, women and scheduled castes are consistently under-represented. The practice of using "caste neutral" names is on the rise. Though there is little evidence of "matching" between judges and petitioners or judges and filing advocates on the basis of names, there is evidence that petitioners and their advocates match on the basis of identity such as the use of "caste neutral" names. These results suggest that the social movements that disrupted existing social structures in the past may have inadvertently created new social categories that reinforce networks and inequalities in the formal justice system.

Bihar --- Caste --- Gender --- Gender and Law --- Inequality --- Judicial Performance --- Judicial System Reform --- Justice System --- Law and Development --- Nationalities and Ethnic Groups --- Religion --- Social Category --- Social Development --- Social Inclusion and Institutions