Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Common Sense in Environmental Management examines common sense not in theory, but in practice. Jonathan Woolley argues that common sense as a concept is rooted in English experiences of landscape and land management and examines it ethnographically - unveiling common sense as key to understanding how British nature and public life are transforming in the present day. Common sense encourages English people to tacitly assume that the management of land and other resources should organically converge on a consensus that yields self-evident, practical results. Furthermore, the English then tend to assume that their own position reflects that consensus. Other stakeholders are not seen as having legitimate but distinct expertise and interests - but are rather viewed as being stupid and/or immoral, for ignoring self-evident, pragmatic truths. Compromise is therefore less likely, and land management practices become entrenched and resistant to innovation and improvement. Through a detailed ethnographic study of the Norfolk Broads, this book explores how environmental policy and land management in rural areas could be more effective if a truly common sense was restored in the way we manage our shared environment. Using academic and lay deployments of common sense as a route into the political economy of rural environments, this book will be of great interest to scholars and students of socio-cultural anthropology, sociology, human geography, cultural studies, social history, and the environmental humanities.

Common sense. --- Land use, Rural --- Environmental management --- Broads, The (England) --- Environmental conditions.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its wayMilton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman's prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago-one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics-as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists.

Economic policy. --- Economic nationalism --- Economic planning --- National planning --- State planning --- Economics --- Planning --- National security --- Social policy --- Economic policy --- Liberalism --- Comparative economics --- Comparative economic systems --- Economics, Comparative --- Liberal egalitarianism --- Liberty --- Political science --- Social sciences --- E-books --- Comparative economics. --- Liberalism. --- BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economic History. --- Aaron Director. --- Alvin Roth. --- Amartya Sen. --- Ariel Rubinstein. --- Buchanan political economy. --- Chicago Economics Department. --- Chicago School of Economics. --- Chicago School. --- Chicago economics. --- Chicago tradition. --- Chicago. --- Classical Liberal attitude. --- Classical Liberal methodology. --- Classical Liberalism. --- Classical Liberals. --- Coasian institutionalist approach. --- Dani Rodrik. --- Edward Leamer. --- George Stigler. --- James Buchanan. --- James Laughlin. --- John Stuart Mill. --- Milton Friedman. --- Paul Romer. --- Ronald Coase. --- University of Chicago. --- Virginia School. --- argumentation. --- econometric testing. --- economic policy analysis. --- economic policy. --- economic science. --- economic theory. --- economics. --- economists. --- educated common sense. --- formal theory. --- liberal economists. --- liberalism. --- mainstream theory. --- minimum wage. --- modern economics. --- policy differences. --- policy economics. --- policy issue. --- policy issues. --- policy methodology. --- policy prescriptions. --- policy problems. --- policy. --- postwar era. --- science. --- scientific economics. --- scientific methods. --- scientific policy. --- scientific theory. --- theoretical problems. --- welfare economics.