Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. Jusrisprudence. --- Europees Hof voor de rechten van de mens. Rechtspraak.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Procédure (droit) --- Effectivité et validité du droit. --- Procès équitable --- Droits de l'homme --- Primauté du droit --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme --- Conseil de l'Europe.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Europees Hof voor de rechten van de mens. --- Van Droogenbroeck (Valery). --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. --- Van Droogenbroeck (Valery).

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Europees Hof voor de rechten van de mens. Rechtspraak. --- Eckle (Hans). --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. Jurisprudence. --- Eckle (Hans).

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Over the past decades the European Court of Human Rights has been increasingly engaged in constitutional decision-making. In this time the Court has decided whether abortion, assisted suicide, and surrogate motherhood are human rights. The Court's judgments therefore do not just affect the parties to a particular case, but individuals, other member states, and often European society at large. Unsurprisingly, a variety of entities such as non-governmental organisations, try to participate in the Court's proceedings as third-party interveners. Acknowledging a certain public interest in its decision-making, the Court accepted the first intervention in 1979. Since that time, interventions by individuals, member states and non-governmental organisations have increased. Yet despite this long-standing practice, third-party interventions have never been fully theorised. Third-Party Interventions before the European Court of Human Rights is the first comprehensive and empirical study on third-party interventions before an international court. Analysing all cases between 1979 and 2016 to which an intervention was made the book explores their potential influence on the reasoning and decision-making of the Court. It further argues that there are three different types of intervention playing different roles in the administration of justice: amicus curiae interventions by organisations with a virtual interest in the case which strengthen the Court's legitimacy in its democratic environment; member state interventions reinforcing state sovereignty; and actual third-party interventions by individuals who are involved in the facts of a case and who are protecting their own legal interests. As a consequence, the book makes a plea for applying distinct admissibility criteria to the different type of interventions as well as a more transparent procedure when accepting and denying interventions. Dr Nicole Bürli has been a human rights adviser with the World Organisation Against Torture since 2014. Prior to this, she was a research associate at the University of Zurich (2008-2012) and a visiting fellow at the University of Copenhagen (2012) and the University of Cambridge (2013). Nicole Bürli holds law degrees from the University of Bern and the University of Zurich.

Human rights --- Intervention (Civil procedure) --- Cases. --- European Court of Human Rights --- Decision making. --- Cases --- Law of civil procedure --- Intervention (procédure civile) --- Parties (procédure) --- Tiers (droit) --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme --- Third party countermeasures (international law) --- Rules and Practice.