Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Er is geen enkel wetenschappelijk bewijs dat homeopathie werkt. Toch wordt het veel gebruikt voor allerlei kwalen. De positieve ervaringen van de gebruikers kunnen te maken hebben met het ‘placebo-effect’, dus omdat patiënt en therapeut een effect verwachten. Tegelijk is er wel een risico dat men een noodzakelijke klassieke medische behandeling niet of te laat opstart, door een gemiste of verkeerde diagnose. Daarom wordt de uitoefening van homeopathie best beperkt tot artsen, die nu al de meerderheid van de homeopaten uitmaken. Dit concludeert het Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de gezondheidszorg (KCE) in zijn derde studie over de situatie van niet-conventionele therapieën in België. Eerder waren osteopathie en chiropraxie aan de beurt, en vervolgens acupunctuur.

2009-50 --- 2009-50 --- 2009-50 --- adverse effects --- adverse effects --- adverse effects --- Belgium --- Belgium --- Belgium --- education --- education --- education --- Homeopathy --- Homeopathy --- Homeopathy --- legislation and jurisprudence --- legislation and jurisprudence --- legislation and jurisprudence --- Organisation and Administration --- Organisation and Administration --- Organisation and Administration --- Qualitative Research --- Qualitative Research --- Qualitative Research --- R154 --- R154 --- R154 --- statistics and numerical data [Subheading] --- statistics and numerical data [Subheading] --- statistics and numerical data [Subheading] --- Treatment outcome --- Treatment outcome --- Treatment outcome --- trends --- trends --- trends --- utilization --- utilization --- utilization --- WB 930 Homeopathy --- WB 930 Homeopathy --- WB 930 Homeopathy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

1. Contrôle et standardisation des soins de santé : analyse d'un malaise - 2. Guide de bonnes pratiques, réglementation et standardisation des soins - 3. Aspects cliniques de la standardisation des soins - 4. Standardisation des soins de santé, économie et technologies de l'information - 5. Standardisation des soins de santé et éthique - 6. Standardisation, modèles médicaux et anthropologie - 7. Standardisation des soins de santé : perspectives et propositions - Conclusion - Remerciements - Liste des abréviations - Bibliographie

W 84 Health services. Quality of health care (General) --- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation --- Quality of Health Care --- Quality control --- Health Personnel --- Standards --- Medical Care --- Health planning --- Medical care --- Santé publique --- Soins médicaux --- Evaluation. --- Planification --- Evaluation --- Patient Care --- Health Care --- Economics, Medical --- Ethics, Medical --- Health Planning --- standards --- trends --- Santé publique --- Soins médicaux --- Beroepscategorieën en functies : Gezondheidsberoepen --- Catégories professionnelles et fonctions : Professions de la santé --- National health services --- Medical policy --- Medical economics --- Medical ethics --- Patient Care - standards --- Patient Care - trends

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How was life in 1820, and how has it improved since then? What are the long-term trends in global well-being? Views on social progress since the Industrial Revolution are largely based on historical national accounting in the tradition of Kuznets and Maddison. But trends in real GDP per capita may not fully re­flect changes in other dimensions of well-being such as life expectancy, education, personal security or gender inequality. Looking at these indicators usually reveals a more equal world than the picture given by incomes alone, but has this always been the case? The new report How Was Life? aims to fill this gap. It presents the first systematic evidence on long-term trends in global well-being since 1820 for 25 major countries and 8 regions in the world covering more than 80% of the world’s population. It not only shows the data but also discusses the underlying sources and their limitations, pays attention to country averages and inequality, and pinpoints avenues for further research.The How Was Life? report is the product of collaboration between the OECD, the OECD Development Centre and the CLIO-INFRA project. It represents the culmination of work by a group of economic historians to systematically chart long-term changes in the dimensions of global well-being and inequality, making use of the most recent research carried out within the discipline. The historical evidence reviewed in the report is organised around 10 different dimensions of well-being that mirror those used by the OECD in its well-being report How’s Life? (www.oecd.org/howslife), and draw on the best sources and expertise currently available for historical perspectives in this field. These dimensions are:per capita GDP, real wages, educational attainment, life expectancy, height, personal security, political institutions, environmental quality, income inequality and gender inequality.

Health Care --- Quality Indicators, Health Care --- statistics and numerical data [Subheading] --- Sociology Research --- Population --- Quality of Life --- History --- HN 25 - Statistics. Social indicators. Quality of life --- REAL WAGES -- 330.4 --- EDUCATION -- 330.4 --- LIFE EXPECTANCY -- 330.4 --- INCOME INEQUALITY -- 330.4 --- ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY -- 330.4 --- GENDER INEQUALITY -- 330.4 --- LONG-TERM TRENDS IN GLOBAL WELL-BEING -- 330.4