Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

De term radicalisering staat hoog op de lijst van ons politiek woordgebruik. Deze 19de-eeuwse term stamt uit een progressieve en liberale gedachtegoed. Nu duidt hij steevast op verontrustende ideologische tendensen en processen - vaak van moslimsignatuur - die zouden kunnen leiden tot geweld. In deze lezing staat Fadil stil bij de semantische verschuiving van de term radicalisering gedurende de laatste vijftien jaar. Ze toont aan hoe de term radicalisering gradueel als ideologisch denkkader ging fungeren om bepaalde vormen van activisme en politiek handelen te pathologiseren en te problematiseren. Ze argumenteert dat de term radicalisering tekenend is voor een onvermogen om niet-seculiere en niet-westerse taal en actievormen te integreren in een politieke woordenschat.

Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Europe --- #SBIB:321H30 --- #SBIB:17H3 --- #SBIB:17H20 --- politieke filosofie --- Hedendaagse politieke en sociale theorieën (vanaf de 19de eeuw): algemeen (incl. utilitarisme, burgerschap) --- Politieke wijsbegeerte --- Sociale wijsbegeerte: algemeen --- 32 --- Radicalisme --- Radicalisering --- Multiculturele samenleving --- Islam en het Westen --- Islamitisch-fundamentalisme --- Godsdienst --- Islam in het Westen --- Social problems --- Colonisation. Decolonisation --- Pragmatics --- Politiek --- PXL-Central Office 2020 --- maatschappijproblemen --- multiculturele samenleving --- radicalisme --- Islam --- Moslimfundamentalisme --- Filosofie --- Psychologie --- Sociologie --- Architectuur --- Man --- Cultuur --- Erfelijkheidsleer --- Stadssamenleving --- Verpleegkunde --- Volwassene --- 668.1 Migrantenbeleid --- radicalisering --- politiek woordgebruik --- ideologische tendensen en processen --- geweld --- semantiek --- activisme --- politiek handelen --- niet-seculiere en niet-westerse taal en actievormen --- politieke woordenschat

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The concept of 'radicalization' is now used to account for all forms of violent and non-violent political Islam. Used widely within the security services and picked up by academia, the term was initially coined by the General Intelligence and Security Service of the Netherlands (AIVD) after the 9/11 and Pentagon attacks, an origin that is rarely recognised.This book comprises contributions from leading scholars in the field of critical security studies to trace the introduction, adoption and dissemination of 'radicalization' as a concept. It is the first book to offer a critical analysis and history of the term as an 'empty signifier', that is, a word that might not necessarily refer to something existing in the real world. The diverse contributions consider how the term has circulated since its emergence in the Netherlands and Belgium, its appearance in academia, its existence among the people categorized as 'radicals' and its impact on relationships of trust between public officials and their clients. Building on the traditions of critical security studies and critical studies on terrorism, the book reaffirms the importance of a reflective approach to counter-radicalization discourse and policies. It will be essential reading for scholars of security studies, political anthropology, the study of Islam in the west and European studies.Bron: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/radicalization-in-belgium-and-the-netherlands-9781784538897/

Islam --- Social problems --- Criminology. Victimology --- islamitisch fundamentalisme --- criminologie --- terrorisme --- Netherlands --- Belgium --- Radicalisering --- Radicalisme --- België --- Nederland --- Geweld --- Veiligheid --- Islamic fundamentalism. --- National security. --- Radicalization. --- Radicalisation violente. --- Sécurité nationale. --- Intégrisme islamique. --- Radicalization --- National security --- Islamic fundamentalism --- #SBIB:316.331H333 --- #SBIB:316.331H421 --- Fundamentalism, Islamic --- Islamism --- Religious fundamentalism --- National security policy --- NSP (National security policy) --- Security policy, National --- Economic policy --- International relations --- Military policy --- Radicalisation --- Political science --- Godsdienst, oorlog en vrede --- Morfologie van de godsdiensten: Islam --- Government policy --- Ethnic relations --- Ethic relations. --- 081 Godsdienst

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

On August 11th 2016 Zambia held a national referendum to amend to the Bill of Rights alongside general elections. The referendum, however, failed to pull through as the required fifty percent voter’s turnout was not met. The proposed Bill of Rights would guarantee the equality of both genders instead of a non-discrimination based on sex provision. Men and women would have the right to equal treatment, opportunities, inheritance, land ownership, marriage and reproductive health. The aim of this thesis is to elaborate on the perspectives of women in Zambia with the current Bill of Rights and with the proposed Bill of Rights. Does the amendment to enhance the Bill of Rights actually results in an improved situation for women? The current Bill of Rights, for example, safeguards the freedom to practice a culture of choice. Traditional African cultures with its customary law nevertheless are erelong associated with gender discrimination. The enhanced Bill of Rights provides a profound equality clause, which the right to cultural diversity and customary law cannot trump. The question is or an enhanced Bill of Rights can indeed provide a solution to gender discrimination. Through qualitative interviews, the observation of two customary trials and extensive literature study, I define the perspectives of women in Zambia. The current Bill of Rights emphasizes the cultural identity of women, while the proposed Bill of Rights focuses on the gender identity of women. Hence, a dichotomy of culture and gender equality is created. Within five years’ time, the referendum will be repeated. Hopefully, the Zambian government makes use of those years to be inspired by the Maputo Protocol, which balances gender and cultural rights – taking intersectionality into account.