Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Under Action 14, jurisdictions have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses jurisdictions against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by France.

Double taxation --- Taxation --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- ADR (Dispute resolution) --- Alternative dispute resolution --- Appropriate dispute resolution --- Collaborative law --- Conflict resolution --- Dispute processing --- Dispute settlement --- Justice, Administration of --- Mediation --- Neighborhood justice centers --- Third parties (Law)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

La mejora de los mecanismos de resolución de controversias es uno de los aspectos clave de las actuaciones e iniciativas acometidas para abordar los problemas BEPS. Las medidas desarrolladas en el marco de esta acción del Proyecto BEPS, comprendidas también en el presente informe, apuntan a minimizar los riesgos de incertidumbre y doble imposición involuntaria, velando por la aplicación coherente y adecuada de los convenios fiscales, así como  por la oportuna y efectiva resolución de controversias en lo que se refiere a su interpretación o aplicación a través del procedimiento amistoso. Los distintos países han dado luz verde a cambios sustanciales en sus respectivas actitudes frente a la solución de controversias, hecho que se plasma fundamentalmente en el desarrollo de un estándar básico en lo referente a la resolución de conflictos de interpretación o aplicación de los convenios, habiéndose comprometido a su rápida aplicación y -a garantizar su efectiva implementación mediante la puesta en marcha de un sólido mecanismo de supervisión inter pares. Por otra parte, un gran número de países ha manifestado su compromiso de establecer procedimientos de resolución de controversias con carácter preceptivo y vinculante en sus convenios fiscales bilaterales, tales como el arbitraje, en tanto que mecanismo que garantiza la resolución de conflictos en la interpretación y/o aplicación de convenios en un plazo determinado.

Taxation. --- Double taxation. --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- ADR (Dispute resolution) --- Alternative dispute resolution --- Appropriate dispute resolution --- Collaborative law --- Conflict resolution --- Dispute processing --- Dispute settlement --- Justice, Administration of --- Mediation --- Neighborhood justice centers --- Third parties (Law) --- Double taxation --- International taxation (Double taxation) --- Taxation, Double --- Taxation --- Conflict of laws --- Duties --- Fee system (Taxation) --- Tax policy --- Tax reform --- Taxation, Incidence of --- Taxes --- Finance, Public --- Revenue --- Law and legislation

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This publication presents four studies which represent recent core work of the OECD Investment Committee. The first study, "Transparency and Third Party Participation in Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement ," aims to enhance understanding of the role of transparency and third party participation in investor-state dispute settlement procedures. It examines the current rules, steps taken to improve transparency, and the perceived advantages as well as the challenges of additional transparency.  Two other studies touch upon two of the most frequently contested provisions in investor-state arbitration. "Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law" clarifies the concept, based on jurisprudence and state practice. "‘Indirect Expropriation’ and the ‘Right to Regulate’ in International Investment Law" identifies the main criteria found in investment agreements and used by tribunals to articulate the difference between the two concepts.  The final paper looks at most favoured nation treatment.

Investments, Foreign --- International commercial arbitration. --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- Law and legislation. --- ADR (Dispute resolution) --- Alternative dispute resolution --- Appropriate dispute resolution --- Collaborative law --- Conflict resolution --- Dispute processing --- Dispute settlement --- Arbitration and award, International --- Commercial arbitration, International --- International arbitration and award --- International commercial arbitration --- Law and legislation --- Justice, Administration of --- Mediation --- Neighborhood justice centers --- Third parties (Law) --- Arbitration and award --- Conflict of laws

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Aux termes de l'Action 14, les juridictions se sont engagées à mettre en œuvre un standard minimum afin d’améliorer l'efficacité et l’efficience de la procédure amiable (PA). La PA est prévue à l'article 25 du modèle de convention fiscale de l'OCDE et engage les pays à s'efforcer de résoudre les différends relatifs à l'interprétation et à l'application des conventions fiscales. Le Standard Minimum de l’Action 14 a été traduit en termes de référence précis, et une méthodologie a été établie pour le processus d’examen par les pairs et de suivi de cet examen. Le processus d'examen par les pairs se déroule en deux phrases. La première phase consiste à évaluer les juridictions par rapport aux termes de référence du standard minimum, selon un calendrier d'examen convenu. La seconde phase procède au suivi des recommandations formulées dans le rapport d'examen par les pairs de phase 1 des juridictions. Le présent rapport reflète les résultats de l'évaluation par les pairs de phase 1 de la mise en œuvre du Standard Minimum de l'Action 14 par la France.

Taxation. --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- ADR (Dispute resolution) --- Alternative dispute resolution --- Appropriate dispute resolution --- Collaborative law --- Conflict resolution --- Dispute processing --- Dispute settlement --- Justice, Administration of --- Mediation --- Neighborhood justice centers --- Third parties (Law) --- Duties --- Fee system (Taxation) --- Tax policy --- Tax reform --- Taxation, Incidence of --- Taxes --- Finance, Public --- Revenue

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Double taxation --- Taxation --- Dispute resolution (Law) --- ADR (Dispute resolution) --- Alternative dispute resolution --- Appropriate dispute resolution --- Collaborative law --- Conflict resolution --- Dispute processing --- Dispute settlement --- Justice, Administration of --- Mediation --- Neighborhood justice centers --- Third parties (Law) --- International taxation (Double taxation) --- Taxation, Double --- Conflict of laws --- Law and legislation