Listing 1 - 10 of 21 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This book explores the view that impoverishment and Agree operations are part of a single grammatical component. The architecture set forth here gives rise tocomplex but highly systematic interactions between the two operations. This interaction is shown to provide a unified and general account of apparentlydiverse and unrelated intances of eccentric argument encoding that so far haveremained elusive to a unified theoretical account. The proposed view of the grammatical architecture achieves an integration of these phenomena withinbetter-studied languages and thus gives rise to a more general theory of caseand agreement phenomena. The empirical evidence on the basis of which the proposal is developed drawsfrom a wide range of typologically non-related languages, including Basque, Hindi, Icelandic, Itelmen, Marathi, Nez Perce, Niuean, Punjabi, Sahaptin, Selayarese, Yukaghir, and Yurok . The proposal has far-reaching consequences for the study of grammatical architecture, linguistic interfaces, derivational locality in apparently non-local dependencies and the role of functional considerations in formal approaches tothe human language faculty.
Grammar --- Agreement. --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Concord --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Case --- Case. --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Syntax --- Linguistics --- Philology
Choose an application
This text explores the role of agreement morphology in the morphosyntactic realization of a verb's arguments. It compares configurational and nonconfigurational languages and should be useful to linguists concerned with morphosyntactic theory, typology, and the interactions of syntax.
Grammar --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Language and languages --- Syntax --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Agreement --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Agreement. --- Syntax. --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax
Choose an application
Comparative linguistics --- Grammar --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Syntax. --- Case. --- Agreement. --- Language and languages --- Syntax --- Case --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Agreement --- Concord --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax
Choose an application
The status of agreement is a core issue in current morphological and syntactic theory. The collection of papers in this volume focuses on important issues, such as the nature of the relation between syntax and morphology in determining agreement relations; whether and which syntactic configurations are relevant for determining agreement; the relevance of verbal agreement for the purposes of EPP; the inquiry into the existence of connections between verbal and DP-internal agreement; on the morphological and syntactic distinction of person, number and gender agreement; how and why AGREE and Spec,head relations trigger different agreement effects; and the type of relation that exists between head-movement and morphological agreement. The data collected come from a wide variety of languages and the studies presented discuss innovative and thought-provoking ideas for dealing with agreement phenomena.
Grammar, Comparative and general --- Linguistics. --- Linguistic science --- Science of language --- Language and languages --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Agreement. --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Syntax --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar --- Comparative linguistics --- Agreement
Choose an application
The aim of this book is to give the first large-scale typological investigation of pluractionality in the languages of the world. Pluractionality is defined as the morphological modification of the verb to express a plurality of situations that can additionally involve a plurality of participants and/or spaces. Based on a 246-language sample, the main characteristics of pluractionality are described and discussed throughout the book. Firstly, a description of the functions that pluractional markers cross-linguistically express is presented and the relationships occurring among them are explained through the semantic map model. Then, the marking strategies that languages display to express such functions are illustrated and some issues concerning the formal identification are briefly discussed as well. The typological generalizations are corroborated showing how pluractional markers work in three specific languages (Akawaio, Beja, Maa). In conclusion, the theoretical conceptualization of pluractionality is discussed referring to the Radical Construction Grammar approach.
Grammar --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Verb --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Dual (Grammar) --- Number (Grammar) --- Plural (Grammar) --- Agreement --- Number --- Verb phrase --- Verbals --- Reflexives --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Person --- Syntax --- E-books --- Agreement. --- Number. --- Verb. --- Linguistics --- Philology
Choose an application
English language --- Number --- Agreement --- -English language --- -Germanic languages --- -Agreement --- Number. --- Agreement. --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Person --- Syntax --- Grammar --- Germanic languages --- English language - Number --- English language - Agreement
Choose an application
This monograph pursues a structural analogy between the availability of an existential interpretation in states and the telicity of events. Focusing on evidence from both verbal and adjectival predicates, it argues that quantization forms the basis of a unified theory of aktionsart and provides a theory in which the availability of an existential interpretation in states is, like the telicity of events, determined compositionally by the predicate and the quantization of its internal argument. Quantization is further argued to reflect the internal temporal constitution of the stages
Lexicology. Semantics --- Grammar --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Semantics. --- 801.56 --- Formal semantics --- Semasiology --- Semiology (Semantics) --- Comparative linguistics --- Information theory --- Language and languages --- Lexicology --- Meaning (Psychology) --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Syntax --- Predicate (Grammar) --- Verb phrase --- Verb phrase. --- Syntax. --- Agreement. --- Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Phrasal verb --- Predicate --- Verbals --- 801.56 Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Semantics --- Agreement --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax
Choose an application
An argument that not only do movement and agreement occur in every language, they also work in tandem to imbue natural language with enormous expressive power. An unusual property of human language is the existence of movement operations. Modern syntactic theory from its inception has dealt with the puzzle of why movement should occur. In this monograph, Shigeru Miyagawa combines this question with another, that of the occurrence of agreement systems. Using data from a wide range of languages, he argues that movement and agreement work in tandem to achieve a specific goal: to imbue natural language with enormous expressive power. Without movement and agreement, he contends, human language would be merely a shadow of itself, with severe limitation on what can be expressed. Miyagawa investigates a variety of languages, including English, Japanese, Bantu languages, Romance languages, Finnish, and Chinese. He finds that every language manifests some kind of agreement, some in the form of the familiar person/number/gender system and others in the form of what Katalin E. Kiss calls "discourse configurational" features such as topic and focus. A key proposal of his argument is that the computational system in syntax deals with the wide range of agreement types uniformly--as if there were just one system--and an integral part of this computation turns out to be movement. Why Agree? Why Move? is unique in proposing a unified system for movement and agreement across language groups that are vastly diverse--Bantu languages, East Asian languages, Indo-European languages, and others.
Government-binding theory (Linguistics). --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Agreement. --- Government-binding theory (Linguistics) --- Agreement --- Grammar --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Binding theory (Linguistics) --- Government and binding (Linguistics) --- Generative grammar --- Linguistics --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Syntax --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Agreement --- LINGUISTICS & LANGUAGE/General
Choose an application
'Agreement' is the grammatical phenomenon in which the form of one item, such as the noun 'horses', forces a second item in the sentence, such as the verb 'gallop', to appear in a particular form, i.e. 'gallop' must agree with 'horses' in number. Even though agreement phenomena are some of the most familiar and well-studied aspects of grammar, there are certain basic questions that have rarely been asked, let alone answered. This book develops a theory of the agreement processes found in language, and considers why verbs agree with subjects in person, adjectives agree in number and gender but not person, and nouns do not agree at all. Explaining these differences leads to a theory that can be applied to all parts of speech and to all languages.
Grammar --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Agreement --- 801.56 --- Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Congruentie (taalkunde) --- Agreement. --- 801.56 Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Congruentie (taalkunde). --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Syntax --- Linguistics. --- Linguistic science --- Science of language --- Language and languages --- Arts and Humanities --- Language & Linguistics --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Agreement
Choose an application
Agreement in language relates to the correspondence between words in a sentence, in terms of gender, case, person, or number. For example, in the sentence 'he runs', the suffix -s 'agrees' in number with the singular pronoun 'he'. Patterns of agreement vary dramatically cross-linguistically, with great diversity in the way it is expressed and the types of variation permitted. This clear introduction offers an insight into how agreement works, and how linguists have tried to account for it. Comparing examples from a range of languages, with radically different agreement systems, it demonstrates agreement at work in a variety of constructions. It shows how agreement is influenced by the conflicting effects of sentence structure and meaning, and highlights the oddities of agreement in English. The first textbook devoted to the cross-linguistic study of the topic, Agreement will be essential reading for all those studying the structure and mechanisms of natural languages.
Grammar, Comparative and general --- Agreement --- 801.56 --- Syntaxis. Semantiek --- 801.56 Syntaxis. Semantiek --- Accord (Linguistique) --- Agreement. --- Congruentie (taalkunde) --- Congruentie (taalkunde). --- Agreement (Grammar) --- Concord (Grammar) --- Concord --- Case --- Gender --- Number --- Person --- Syntax --- Comparative linguistics --- Grammar --- Grammaire --- Variation linguistique --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Agreement --- Accord (linguistique)
Listing 1 - 10 of 21 | << page >> |
Sort by
|