Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

gerechtsjournalistiek --- Law of civil procedure --- gerechtshof --- TV (televisie) --- Mass communications --- United States --- Conduct of court proceedings --- Free press and fair trial --- Television broadcasting of court proceedings --- United States of America

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

World history --- 340.096 --- Trials --- -Trials --- State trials --- Procedure (Law) --- Beroemde processen. --- Trials. --- 340.096 Beroemde processen. --- Court proceedings --- Beroemde processen

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"In response to increasing mobility and migration in Europe, the European Directive 2010/64/EU on strengthening the rights to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings has highlighted the importance of quality in legal translation and interpreting. At the same time, the economic situation is putting pressure on public services and translation/interpreting service providers alike, jeopardizing quality standards and fair access to justice. With regard to interpreting, the use of videoconference technology is now being widely considered as a potential solution for gaining cost-effective and timely access to qualified legal interpreters. However, this gives rise to many questions, including: how technological mediation through videoconferencing affects the quality of interpreting; how this is related to the actual videoconference setting and the distribution of participants; and ultimately whether the different forms of video-mediated interpreting are sufficiently reliable for legal communication. It is against this backdrop that the AVIDICUS Project (2008-11), co-funded by the European Commission's Directorate-General Justice, set out to research the quality and viability of video-mediated interpreting in criminal proceedings. This volume, which is based on the final AVIDICUS Symposium in 2011, presents a cross-section of the findings from AVIDICUS and complementary research initiatives, as well as recommendations for judicial services, legal practitioners and police officers, and legal interpreters"--Provided by publisher.

Telecommunication technology --- Interpreting --- Criminology. Victimology --- Court interpreting and translating --- Conduct of court proceedings --- Videoconferencing --- Criminal procedure --- Technological innovations --- Conferencing, Video --- Video conferencing --- Video teleconferencing --- Teleconferencing --- Criminal law --- Courts --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Procedure (Law) --- Public law --- Appellate procedure --- Criminal courts --- Trial practice --- Bilingual court services --- Translating and interpreting --- Conduct in courtrooms --- Court proceedings, Conduct of --- Courtroom decorum --- Courtroom proceedings --- Decorum in court --- Legal decorum --- Photographing of court proceedings --- Legal etiquette --- Publicity (Law) --- Pleading and practice --- Law and legislation --- Translating services --- Court proceedings --- Court interpreting and translating - Technological innovations - Europe --- Conduct of court proceedings - Technological innovations - Europe --- Videoconferencing - Europe --- Criminal procedure - Technological innovations - Europe --- Droit européen --- Entraide judiciaire européenne --- Droit pénal --- Procédure pénale --- Pays de l'Union européenne

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book takes you into a common-law courtroom which is in no way similar to any other courtroom where common law is practised. This uniqueness is characterised, in particular, by the use of English as the trial language in a predominantly Cantonese-speaking society and by the presence of other bilinguals in court, thus presenting specific challenges for the interpreters who work in it, and at times rendering the interpretation service superfluous. This study, inter alia, problematises judges’ intervention in the court proceedings, Chinese witnesses testifying in English, as well as English-language trials heard by Chinese jurors. It demonstrates how the use of chuchotage proves to be inadequate and inappropriate in the Hong Kong courtroom, where interpreting in an English-language trial is arguably provided to cater for the need of the linguistic majority. This book is useful to interpreters, language educators, legal professionals, forensic linguists and policy makers alike.

Interpreting --- Law --- Hong Kong --- #KVHA:Vertaalwetenschap --- #KVHA:Tolken; Hong Kong --- Court interpreting and translating --- Translators --- Common law --- Conduct of court proceedings --- Conduct in courtrooms --- Courtroom decorum --- Decorum in court --- Legal decorum --- Court proceedings --- Legal etiquette --- Procedure (Law) --- Anglo-American law --- Law, Anglo-American --- Customary law --- Interpreters --- Linguists --- Translating services --- Bilingual court services --- Courts --- Translating and interpreting --- Legal status, laws, etc --- Language --- E-books --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Language. --- Court interpreting and translating - China - Hong Kong --- Translators - Legal status, laws, etc. - China - Hong Kong --- Common law - China - Hong Kong - Language --- Conduct of court proceedings - China - Hong Kong

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Actions and defenses --- Remedies (Law) --- 341.2422 --- Uf4.3 --- Civil actions --- Defense (Law) --- Interpleader --- Lawsuits --- Litigation --- Personal actions --- Real actions --- Suits (Law) --- Court proceedings --- Procedure (Law) --- Trial practice --- Civil procedure --- Law and legislation --- European law