Listing 1 - 10 of 264 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Motion pictures --- Films --- Editing --- Montage --- Motion pictures - Editing
Choose an application
Manuscripts, Medieval --- Manuscripts --- Editing --- Digital media --- Manuscripts, Medieval - Congresses --- Manuscripts - Editing - Congresses --- Editing - Congresses --- Digital media - Editing - Congresses --- Editions savantes
Choose an application
Social sciences --- Data editing. --- Economics
Choose an application
muziek --- Music --- uitgeven --- muziekkritiek --- Musique --- Editing. --- Edition --- Editing --- 78.89 --- Music - Editing. --- Muziekwetenschappen --- Uitgeverijen --- Muziekuitgeverijen
Choose an application
"Qu'est-ce qu'un antigraphe, un archétype, une variante, un original ou encore un autographe ? D'un auteur à l'autre, ces termes désignent des concepts différents, si bien que l'ambiguïté de la terminologie est devenue un obstacle au travail de l'éditeur. La situation s'est aggravée avec une spécialisation accrue par période, par genre de discours et par type de matériaux (manuscrits, imprimés, genèses textuelles). La critique génétique, la philologie médiévale et la philologie du texte imprimé ne pratiquent pas exactement la même langue. L'objectif du présent manuel est de proposer un accès aisé et rapide aux principales notions de l'édition de textes, tout en sensibilisant les éditeurs scientifiques à la nécessaire précision terminologique ainsi qu'aux sous-entendus méthodologiques de bons nombres de termes. Il vise ensuite à leur montrer que la création terminologique ad libitum n'est pas une fatalité et que certains concepts a priori attachés à une communauté (antiquisants, médiévistes, philologues de l'imprimé ou généticiens) peuvent stimuler la réflexion théorique ou méthodologique d'une autre, au-delà des préjugés. Le pari serait tenu si les éditeurs pouvaient trouver ici un lexique utile pour décrire leur travail, leur démarche éditoriale et comprendre celle des autres."--P. [4] of cover.
Editing --- Edition --- Terminology --- Terminologie --- French --- Edition critique --- Édition critique --- Authorship --- Editing - Terminology --- Editing - Dictionaries - French
Choose an application
Editing has been called the language of cinema, and thus a film's ending can be considered the final punctuation mark of this language, framing everything that came before and offering the key to both our interpretation and our enjoyment of a film. In Cinematic Cuts, scholars explore the philosophical, literary, and psychoanalytic significance of film endings, analyzing how film endings engage our fantasies of cheating death, finding true love, or determining the meaning of life. They examine how endings offer various forms of enjoyment for the spectator, from the momentary fulfillment of desire in the happy ending to the pleasurable torment of an indeterminate ending. The contributors also consider how film endings open onto larger questions relating to endings in our time. They suggest how a film ending's hidden counternarrative can be read as a political act, how our interpretation of a film ending parallels the end of a psychoanalytical session, how film endings reveal our anxieties and fears, and how cinema itself might end with the increasing intervention of digital technologies that reorient the spectator's sense of temporality and closure. Films by Akira Kurosawa, Lars von Trier, Joon-Hwan Jang, Claire Denis, Christopher Nolan, Jane Campion, John Huston, and Spike Jonze, among others, are discussed.
Motion pictures --- Film editing (Cinematography) --- Motion picture editing --- Motion picture film editing --- Editing --- Philosophy. --- Editing. --- Psychological aspects. --- Montage --- Motion pictures - Philosophy --- Motion pictures - Editing --- Motion pictures - Psychological aspects --- Cinéma --- Films --- Philosophie --- Aspect psychologique
Choose an application
Motion pictures --- Cinéma --- Technics --- Technique --- Cinéma --- CDL --- 791.42 --- Film editing (Cinematography) --- Motion picture editing --- Motion picture film editing --- Editing --- Montage
Choose an application
Editors of academic journals are often the top scholars in their fields. They are charged with managing the flow of hundreds of manuscripts each year - from submission to review to rejection or acceptance - all while continuing their own scholarly pursuits. Tenure decisions often turn on who has published what in which journals, but editors can accept only a fraction of the papers submitted. In this book, past and present editors of economics journals discuss navigating the world of academic journals. Their contributions offer essential reading for anyone who has never submitted a paper, served as a referee or associate editor, edited a journal - or read an article and wondered why it was published. The editors describe their experiences at journals that range from the American Economic Review to the Journal of Sports Economics. The issues they examine include late referee reports, slow resubmission of manuscripts, and plagiarism - as well as the difficulties of "herding cats" and the benefits of husband-wife editorial partnerships. They consider the role of the editor, as gatekeeper or developer of content ; and they advise authors to write more carefully and clearly, to include citations that locate their articles in the context of the existing literature, and to update their work after it has been submitted and rejected elsewhere. The chapters also offer a timely, insider's perspective on the general effectiveness of the system of academic journals in economics.
Science --- Economics --- Editing --- Editors --- Economics - Periodicals
Listing 1 - 10 of 264 | << page >> |
Sort by
|