Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

First published in 2005. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Poets, English --- English poets --- Homes and haunts --- Chaucer, Geoffrey, --- Chaucer, Jeffrey, --- Chʻiao-sou, Chieh-fu-lei, --- Chieh-fu-lei Chʻiao-sou, --- Choser, Dzheffri, --- Choser, Zheoffreĭ, --- Cosvr, Jvoffrvi, --- Tishūsar, Zhiyūfrī, --- England --- Social life and customs --- Intellectual life

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Chaucer, Geoffrey --- Chaucer, Geoffrey, --- Criticism and interpretation --- Civilization, Medieval, in literature --- -Criticism and interpretation --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Chaucer, Jeffrey, --- Chʻiao-sou, Chieh-fu-lei, --- Chieh-fu-lei Chʻiao-sou, --- Choser, Dzheffri, --- Choser, Zheoffreĭ, --- Cosvr, Jvoffrvi, --- Tishūsar, Zhiyūfrī, --- Chaucer, Geoffrey - Criticism and interpretation --- CHAUCER (GEOFFREY), d. 1400 --- ESSAYS, LECTURES

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Mythodologies challenges the implied methodology in contemporary studies in the humanities. We claim, at times, that we gather facts or what we will call evidence, and from that form hypotheses and conclusions. Of course, we recognize that the sum total of evidence for any argument is beyond comprehension; therefore, we construct, and we claim, preliminary hypotheses, perhaps to organize the chaos of evidence, or perhaps simply to find it; we might then see (we claim) whether that evidence challenges our tentative hypotheses. Ideally, we could work this way. Yet the history of scholarship and our own practices suggest we do nothing of the kind. Rather, we work the way we teach our composition students to write: choose or construct a thesis, then invent the evidence to support it. This book has three parts, examining such methods and pseudo-methods of invention in medieval studies, bibliography, and editing. Part One, “Noster Chaucer,” looks at examples in Chaucer studies, such as the notion that Chaucer wrote iambic pentameter, and the definition of a canon in Chaucer. “Our” Chaucer has, it seems, little to do with Chaucer himself, and in constructing this entity, Chaucerians are engaged largely in self-validation of their own tradition. Part Two, “Bibliography and Book History,” consists of three studies in the field of bibliography: the recent rise in studies of annotations; the implications of presumably neutral terminology in editing, a case-study in cataloguing. Part Three, “Cacophonies: A Bibliographical Rondo,” is a series of brief studies extending these critiques to other areas in the humanities. It seems not to matter what we talk about: meter, book history, the sex life of bonobos. In all of these discussions, we see the persistence of error, the intractability of uncritical assumptions, and the dominance of authority over evidence.

Literary studies: classical, early & medieval --- Bibliography --- Early printed books --- Methodology. --- Chaucer, Geoffrey, --- Books --- Bibliographic control --- Bibliographical control --- Library research --- Theory, methods, etc. --- Chaucer, Jeffrey, --- Chʻiao-sou, Chieh-fu-lei, --- Chieh-fu-lei Chʻiao-sou, --- Choser, Dzheffri, --- Choser, Zheoffreĭ, --- Cosvr, Jvoffrvi, --- Tishūsar, Zhiyūfrī, --- medieval studies --- Chaucer --- book history --- intellectual history --- bibliography

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book addresses the vexed status of literary value. Unlike other approaches, it pursues neither an apologetic thesis about literature’s defining values nor, conversely, a demystifying account of those values’ ideological uses. Instead, arguing that the category of literary value is inescapable, it focuses pragmatically on everyday scholarly and pedagogical activities, proposing how we may reconcile that category’s inevitability with our understandable wariness of its uncertainties and complicities. Toward these ends, it offers a preliminary theory of literary valuing and explores the problem of literary value in respect to the literary edition, canonicity and interpretation. Much of this exploration occurs within Chaucer studies, which, because of Chaucer’s simultaneous canonicity and marginality, provides fertile ground for thinking through the problem’s challenges. Using this subfield as a synecdoche, the book seeks to forge a viable rationale for literary studies generally. "Literary value – the worth, usefulness or importance of the literary – has been a topic of debate ever since Plato’s impugning of poetry. But from the so-called canon wars of the last century to the present, literary value has also become a perplexing source of distress. With its complicities thoroughly unmasked, literary value no longer serves as the central, self-evident justification for the study of literature. Yet no alternative consensus justification has taken its place. This book, unlike other approaches to the topic, pursues neither an apologetic thesis about the most defining values of literature nor a critique of their ideological uses. Instead, arguing that the category of literary value is ultimately inescapable, it focuses pragmatically on everyday scholarly and pedagogical activities, proposing how we may reconcile that category’s inevitability with our understandable wariness of its intractable uncertainties. The book offers a preliminary theory of literary valuing and explores the problem of literary value and possible responses in respect to the literary edition, canonicity and interpretation. Much of this exploration occurs within Chaucer studies, which, because of Chaucer’s simultaneous canonicity and marginality, provides fertile ground for thinking through the problem’s challenges. The book thereby also supplies an extended reflection on the state of Chaucer studies. In extrapolating from this subfield to the field as a whole, The Problem of Literary Value seeks to forge a viable rationale for literary studies within and beyond the academy." -- Back cover.

Literature --- History and criticism --- Theory, etc. --- Philosophy. --- Chaucer, Geoffrey, --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Literature History and criticism --- Literature and philosophy --- Philosophy and literature --- Theory --- Chaucer, Jeffrey, --- Chʻiao-sou, Chieh-fu-lei, --- Chieh-fu-lei Chʻiao-sou, --- Choser, Dzheffri, --- Choser, Zheoffreĭ, --- Cosvr, Jvoffrvi, --- Tishūsar, Zhiyūfrī, --- Criticism.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Chaucer, Geoffrey --- Poets, English --- Middle English, 1100-1500 --- Biography --- Chaucer, Geoffrey, --- Contemporary England --- England --- Angleterre --- Intellectual life --- Vie intellectuelle --- -English poets --- Great Britain --- History --- -Poets, English --- -Biography --- -Chaucer, Geoffrey --- Contemporary England. --- Chaucer, Jeffrey, --- Chʻiao-sou, Chieh-fu-lei, --- Chieh-fu-lei Chʻiao-sou, --- Choser, Dzheffri, --- Choser, Zheoffreĭ, --- Cosvr, Jvoffrvi, --- Tishūsar, Zhiyūfrī, --- Poets, English - Middle English, 1100-1500 - Biography --- Chaucer, Geoffrey, - -1400 --- Great Britain - History - 14th century