Listing 1 - 10 of 163 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
From December 1944 until the end of March 1945, there existed a forced labour camp for Hungarian Jews in Engerau (today town district Petrzalka of the Slovakian capital Bratislava), which war part of the "Reich Defense Line" ("Wüdostwall"). There, more than 2000 Hungarian Jews had to work like slaves, digging up entrechments to "defend" the German Reich against the approaching soviet troops. Approximate 400 of the forced labourers died of exhaustion, deseases or were beaten to death by Viennese SA men. During the last days of WW II the camp was evacuated. A spezial detachment shot those were sic kor unfit to march, others were killed while the following footmarch to Bad Deutsch-Altenburg. Destination was the concentratio camp of Mauthausen. Those abominable crimes caused a series of legal proceedings in post war Austria against more than 70 accused - the so called "Engerau-trias". In five main trials between 1945 and 1954 against 21 defendants the Vienna "Peoples Court"--A spezial court with the task to punish nazi-crimes - imposed 9 death sentences and 1 life imprisonment. The publication analyzes the legal actions of this spezial court on the basis of the trial records located in the district court in Vienna, puts the proceedings in the lager context of the coping with the Nazi past by Austrian courts, but also in Austrian society, presents biographies of judges, attorneys and counsels of the trials, describes the coverage in the newspapers and gives attention to the gender-aspect and the reflection of the "Engerau-trials" in historiography. This is the first publication, which gives a systematic overview of the first ten years of the 2nd republic focussing post war judiciary in the soviet occupation zone and the archievements of Austrian judiciary in respect to punishing nazi-crimes on the basis of the most extensive Holocaust proceeding in Austria.
Choose an application
Die NS-Prozesse in der Bundesrepublik waren ein Forum, in dem bereits in der fruhen Nachkriegszeit die Verbrechen des Nationalsozialismus verhandelt wurden. Dabei hatten die Holocaust-Uberlebenden und ehemaligen KZ-Haftlinge als Zeugen eine besonders kontroverse Aufgabe, die von der Forschung jedoch bislang kaum beachtet wurde. Vielfach lag es allein an ihnen, mit ihren Berichten die Angeklagten zu uberfuhren. Zugleich waren sie teils massivem Misstrauen der deutschen Justiz ausgesetzt, die die Uberlebenden fur zu parteiisch hielt, um objektive Einschatzungen abzugeben. Die Befragungen und die Konfrontation mit den Tatern stellten zudem eine hohe Belastung dar. Dennoch sagten Tausende Uberlebende aus freien Stucken aus und nahmen die Strapazen auf sich, um die strafrechtliche Verfolgung der Verbrechen voranzubringen. Am Beispiel von vier Auschwitz-Prozessen aus drei Jahrzehnten untersucht Katharina Stengel, welche Bedeutung die Opfer fur die NS-Prozesse hatten, wie die Juristen mit ihnen und ihren unfassbaren Berichten umgingen, wie die Zeuginnen und Zeugen selbst vor Gericht agierten, welche Anliegen sie verfolgten und welche Schlusse sie aus ihren Erfahrungen zogen.
War crime trials --- Germany --- History
Choose an application
Choose an application
War crime trials --- Political violence --- Syria --- History
Choose an application
War crime trials --- Klein, Alfons --- Landesheilanstalt Hadamar.
Choose an application
War crime trials --- Zeuss, Wolfgang --- Struthof (Concentration camp)
Choose an application
War crime trials --- Criminal courts --- International criminal courts.
Choose an application
War crime trials --- Kramer, Josef, --- Bergen-Belsen (Concentration camp)
Choose an application
Theater requires artifice, justice demands truth. Are these demands as irreconcilable as the pejorative term "show trials" suggests? After the Second World War, canonical directors and playwrights sought to claim a new public role for theater by restaging the era's great trials as shows. The Nuremberg trials, the Eichmann trial, and the Auschwitz trials were all performed multiple times, first in courts and then in theaters. Does justice require both courtrooms and stages?In Staged, Minou Arjomand draws on a rich archive of postwar German and American rehearsals and performances to reveal how theater can become a place for forms of storytelling and judgment that are inadmissible in a court of law but indispensable for public life. She unveils the affinities between dramatists like Bertolt Brecht, Erwin Piscator, and Peter Weiss and philosophers such as Hannah Arendt and Walter Benjamin, showing how they responded to the rise of fascism with a new politics of performance. Linking performance with theories of aesthetics, history, and politics, Arjomand argues that it is not subject matter that makes theater political but rather the act of judging a performance in the company of others. Staged weaves together theater history and political philosophy into a powerful and timely case for the importance of theaters as public institutions.
Theater --- Trials. --- War crime trials --- Political aspects. --- Philosophy. --- Legal drama --- Political plays --- Aesthetics --- History and criticism.
Choose an application
Several war crimes trials are well-known to scholars, but others have received far less attention. This book assesses a number of these little-studied trials to recognise institutional innovations, clarify doctrinal debates, and identify their general relevance to the development of international criminal law.
War crime trials. --- Trials (Crimes against humanity) --- Trials (Genocide) --- Trials --- Trials (War crimes)
Listing 1 - 10 of 163 | << page >> |
Sort by
|