Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Contraventions (Criminal law) --- Criminal law --- Police magistrates

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Moeten vaker camera's worden toegelaten in de rechtszaal? Zou persoonlijke informatie over rechters, zoals lidmaatschap van een politieke partij, openbaar moeten worden gemaakt? Zouden rechters actiever stelling moeten nemen in het publieke debat? Is de stap naar een systeem van dissenting opinions wenselijk? De laatste jaren worden dit soort vragen veelvuldig opgeworpen. De rechtspraak moet immers transparanter, zo vinden velen. Burgers moeten beter kunnen zien en begrijpen wat zich in en om de rechtszaal afspeelt. Maar hoe ver moeten de luiken open en met welke middelen zou de rechtspraak dan moeten inzetten op transparantie? En: waar en waarom dienen grenzen aan meer openheid te worden gesteld? Oordelen rechters ander over transparantie, al naar gelang hun leeftijd of de sector waarin ze werkzaam zijn? Tot nu toe was nauwelijks bekend hoe de ruim tweeduizend rechters die Nederland telt over deze en andere vragen denken. Als onderdeel van een breder onderzoek heeft de WRR in de eerste helft van 2012 meer dan vierhonderd rechters uit alle sectoren van de rechtspraak geïnterviewd en geënquêteerd over allerhande kwesties in relatie tot transparantie. In dit boekje worden de resultaten van dit onderzoek gepresenteerd. Als er één ding duidelijk wordt, is het wel dat het onderwerp sterk onder rechters leeft. Een grote meerderheid van hen is voor méér transparantie. Daarbij maken ze nadrukkelijk een onderscheid tussen transparantie op het niveau van de individuele zaaksbehandeling en dat van het instituut rechtspraak. Als het gaat om de vraag hoe transparantie te organiseren, blijken de meningen overigens ook flink uiteen te lopen. Al met al geeft deze publicatie een rijk en gedetailleerd beeld van de overwegingen van rechters pro en contra meer transparantie. Do cameras need to be allowed into the courtroom more often? Should personal information about judges, such as membership of a political party, be made public? Should judges take a more active position in the public debate? Is the step to a system of dissenting opinions desirable? These types of questions have been raised frequently in recent years. After all, the judiciary must be more transparent, so many think. Citizens must be able to see and understand better what is going on in and around the courtroom. But how far should the hatches open and by what means should the judiciary focus on transparency? And: where and why should limits be placed on more openness? Do judges judge transparency, depending on their age or the sector in which they work? Until now, it was hardly known what the more than two thousand judges that the Netherlands counts about these and other questions. As part of a broader investigation, the WRR interviewed and interviewed more than 400 judges from all sectors of the judiciary in the first half of 2012 on all sorts of issues related to transparency. The results of this research are presented in this booklet. If one thing becomes clear, it is that the subject is strongly under judges. A large majority of them is for more transparency. In doing so, they make a clear distinction between transparency at the level of individual case handling and that of the institute for the administration of justice. When it comes to the question of how to organize transparency, opinions also differ considerably. All in all, this publication provides a rich and detailed picture of the considerations of judges for and against more transparency.

Transparency in government. --- Judges. --- Alcaldes --- Cadis --- Chief justices --- Chief magistrates --- Judges --- Justices --- Magistrates --- Courts --- Government in the sunshine --- Open government (Transparency in government) --- Openness in government --- Sunshine, Government in the --- Transparence in government --- Public administration --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Officials and employees

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The present work addresses the history of Derecho Indiano (Spanish Colonial Law) and proposes to examine the role played by Indiano-Castilian jurists in the New World as creators and enforcers of a science and the practice of law. They were given the task of organising and developing public authorities as well as the new society, and in their engagement with the temporary institutions, they were confronted with realities and situations as diverse as they themselves proclaimed them to be.

European history --- History of the Americas --- Legal history --- Spanish colonies. --- Justice, Administration of --- Judges --- Indigenous peoples --- Law --- Colonies. --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Colonies --- History. --- Spain. --- America. --- Derecho Indiano --- Alcaldes --- Cadis --- Chief justices --- Chief magistrates --- Justices --- Magistrates --- Courts --- Administration of justice --- Aboriginal peoples --- Aborigines --- Adivasis --- Indigenous populations --- Native peoples --- Native races --- Ethnology --- Officials and employees --- Law and legislation --- Americas --- New World --- Western Hemisphere --- Espagne --- Espainiako Erresuma --- España --- Espanha --- Espanja --- Espanya --- Estado Español --- Hispania --- Hiszpania --- Isupania --- Kingdom of Spain --- Regne d'Espanya --- Reiaume d'Espanha --- Reino de España --- Reino d'Espanya --- Reinu d'España --- Sefarad --- Sepharad --- Shpanie --- Shpanye --- Spanien --- Spanish State --- Supein --- イスパニア --- スペイン

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The title of this volume is ‘Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies in the Roman Empire’. The papers contained in this volume focus on all three of these themes, within the context of the impact of the Roman empire upon the regions it dominated. The papers contained in the first part of the volume concentrate on appointment policies, career structures and the impact of military presence and recuitment, esp. in border provinces, in the period of the Principate (27 B.C. – A.D. 284). In the second part of the volume the reader will find papers on Roman jurists, administrators, and bureaucrats and articles about administrative procedures, the administration of justice, rescripts and the influence of learned juridical treatises in various regions of the Roman empire. The last section of the volume presents contributions on the impact of the Roman imperial administration and appointment policies on communal rights and politics, the composition of local councils, local administrative structures, Romanisation, and social mobility of regional and local notables in various provinces of the Roman Empire.

Public administration --- Prosopography --- Magistrates, Roman. --- Administration publique (Science) --- Prosopographie --- Magistrats romains --- Rome --- Officials and employees. --- Army. --- Politics and government --- Fonctionnaires --- Armée --- Politique et gouvernement --- Social mobility --- Justice, Administration of --- Army --- Provinces --- Administration --- Officials and employees --- -Social mobility --- -Mobility, Social --- Sociology --- Administration of justice --- Law --- Courts --- Law and legislation --- -Administration. --- -Rome --- Armée --- Roman provinces --- Mobility, Social --- State governments --- Administration. --- Social mobility - Rome --- Justice, Administration of - Rome --- Rome - Army --- Rome - Provinces - Administration --- Rome - Officials and employees --- Ancient history: to c 500 CE

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Un guide utile pour mener à bien un litige devant le tribunal de police Le présent ouvrage a pour seul objectif d’éclairer de la façon la plus concrète possible le praticien généraliste amené à fréquenter occasionnellement le tribunal de police. Il y trouvera l’essentiel des textes légaux et des principes mais aussi, de façon plus pragmatique, des « tuyaux » et illustrations qui lui permettront de mener à bien un litige introduit devant cette juridiction. Avec clarté et précision, les auteurs partagent ici leur grande expérience professionnelle en mettant à la disposition du lecteur une mine d’informations précieuses. De manière très didactique, Jacques Baron, détaille, dans la première partie de l’ouvrage, les règles de compétence et les règles relatives au déroulement de la procédure ainsi que les différentes phases du procès devant les chambres pénales du tribunal de police. La seconde partie de l’ouvrage, rédigée par Thierry Papart, est relative à la procédure applicable devant la section civile du tribunal de police. L’auteur examine également, de manière particulièrement intéressante, la question des amendes administratives, du hooliganisme et du transport public de personnes en région wallonne. Des annexes et des modèles complètent utilement l’ouvrage.

Law of civil procedure --- Belgium --- Procédure (droit) --- Tribunaux de police --- Procédure d'audience --- Circulation --- Droit --- Ebooks --- Police magistrates --- Procedure (Law) --- Procédure (Droit) --- E-books --- BPB1404 --- Juridiction pénale --- Procédure pénale --- кривични поступак --- kazneni postupak --- kriminālprocess --- strafprocedure --- baudžiamasis procesas --- criminal procedure --- kazenski postopek --- brottmålsförfarande --- procedură penală --- rikosasioiden oikeudenkäyntimenettely --- büntetőeljárás --- procedura penale --- procedurë penale --- trestní řízení --- proċedura kriminali --- кривична постапка --- Strafverfahren --- наказателна процедура --- postępowanie karne --- strafferetspleje --- kriminaalkohtumenetlus --- ποινική διαδικασία --- trestnoprávny postup --- processo penal --- procedimiento penal --- skrátené trestné konanie --- trestní řád --- büntetőeljárási jog --- Kriminalrecht --- pojednostavljeni postupak --- law of criminal procedure --- saīsinātais process --- ligj i procedurës penale --- kriminaalasja erimenetlus --- strafrechtliches Sonderverfahren --- strafvordering --- procedura criminale --- procedura semplificata --- direito processual penal --- trestní právo procesní --- procedimiento penal especial --- special criminal procedure --- rikosasioiden erikoisprosessi --- procedura penale speciale --- Strafprozess --- ειδική ποινική διαδικασία --- egyszerűsített eljárás --- processo criminal --- zvláštne trestné konanie --- procedurë e thjeshtuar --- vereenvoudigde procedure --- laki rikosasioiden oikeudenkäyntimenettelystä --- strafferetlig procedure --- ποινική δικονομία --- forenklet procedure --- procedurë e posaçme penale --- Strafverfahrensrecht --- baudžiamojo proceso teisė --- закон за кривична постапка --- straffrättsligt förfarande --- procédure pénale spéciale --- trestní oznámení --- procédure criminelle --- lihtsustatud menetlus --- különleges eljárások --- särskilt brottmålsförfarande --- förenklat rättegångsförfarande --- zakon o kaznenom postupku --- procedură penală specială --- enjuiciamiento criminal --- specialioji baudžiamoji teisena --- kriminaalmenetlusõigus --- απλουστευμένη διαδικασία --- zkrácené trestní řízení --- zákon o trestnoprávnom postupe --- Derecho procesal penal --- droit de la procédure pénale --- kriminalproces --- cod de procedură penală --- procédure simplifiée --- кривичен предмет --- posebni kazneni postupak --- vereinfachtes Verfahren --- diritto processuale penale --- speciale strafrechtspleging --- straffeproces --- procedimiento simplificado --- kriminalrättsligt förfarande --- simplified procedure --- trestní proces --- yksinkertaistettu menettely --- trestní soud --- trestný súd --- tribunal penal --- кривичен суд --- kazensko sodišče --- brottmålsdomstol --- strafrechtspraak --- straffedomstol --- kriminaalkohus --- krimināltiesa --- кривични суд --- giurisdizione penale --- Strafgerichtsbarkeit --- sądownictwo karne --- büntetőbíróság --- gjykatë penale --- qorti kriminali --- jurisdicción penal --- jurisdição penal --- ποινικό δικαστήριο --- criminal court --- baudžiamųjų bylų teismas --- rikostuomioistuin --- наказателен съд --- kazneni sud --- giurisdizione di polizia --- curte cu juri --- prekršajni sud --- police court --- judecătorie polițienească --- Strafkammer --- kolegj penal i përgjithshëm --- přestupkový soud --- cour d'assises --- bendroji baudžiamųjų bylų kolegija --- juzgado de vigilancia penitenciaria --- büntetőkollégium --- Kleine Strafkammer --- tribunal de police --- прекршочни предмети --- policajný priestupkový súd --- αυτόφωρο --- straffrättslig underrätt --- assisdomstol --- polisdomstol --- tribunale correzionale --- kriminaldomstol för grövre brott --- Strafgericht --- кривични предмети --- poliisituomioistuin --- politierechtbank --- policijos teismas --- general criminal panel --- porotní soud --- Assisenhof --- πταισματοδικείο --- Schöffengericht --- tiesa, kam piekrīt krimināllietas --- Schwurgericht --- politseikohus --- Große Strafkammer --- gjykatë policore --- juridiction de simple police --- πλημμελειοδικείο --- tribunal correctionnel --- κακουργιοδικείο --- jurisdicție penală --- porotný trestný súd --- nós imeachta coiriúil --- cúirt choiriúil --- Procédure pénale --- Juridiction pénale --- Belgique