Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Faglig kritikk og refleksjon er viktige elementer i all helsefaglig praksis og kunnskapsutvikling. Denne antologien presenterer et bredt spekter av kritiske perspektiver på helsetjenester og helsevitenskap, i hensikt å utfordre og oppfordre leseren til kritisk refleksjon. Vektleggingen av evidensbasert praksis kan forstås som en kritikk av at helsearbeid i for liten grad har vært basert på det nyeste av vitenskapelig dokumentert kunnskap. Den økende betydningen som tillegges brukermedvirkning i behandling, tjenesteutforming og forskning, kan i stor grad sees som resultatet av årtier med kritikk av paternalistiske og egenrådige profesjoner. På samme måten kan satsing på folkehelse og forebygging forstås som en kritikk av et sykdomsfokusert helsevesen som agerer først når sykdom og skade er et faktum, i stedet for å forebygge. Evidensbasert praksis, brukermedvirkning og folkehelsearbeid kan dermed framstå som hardt tilkjempede, vellykkede og ønskelige resultater av kritisk vitenskapelig virksomhet. Så hva er da meningen med å utsette slike «opplagte goder» for enda mer kritikk? Med denne antologien vil vi demonstrere hvorfor vi kontinuerlig trenger å utfordre det vi tar for gitt, og vise med eksempler hvordan dette kan gjøres. Målgruppen for boken er forskere og undervisere i helsefaglige temaer, samt studenter ved PhD- og masterutdanninger. Enhver profesjonsutøver i helse- og sosialfag vil også ha utbytte av å lese boken. Professional criticism and reflection are important elements in both practice and innovation within the health sciences. This anthology presents a wide range of critical perspectives on health care and health science aimed at challenging and encouraging the reader to critical reflection. The emphasis on evidence-based practice can be understood as a critique of the insufficient extent to which health work has been based on the latest scientific findings. The increasing importance of user involvement in treatment, service design and research can largely be seen as the result of decades of criticism of paternalistism and self-interest within the professions. In the same way, commitment to public health and preventive care can be understood as a critique of a disease-focused healthcare system that is only engaged once disease and/or injury are present, rather than preventing them. Evidence-based practice, user involvement and public health work can thus appear as hard-fought and desirable results of critical scientific activity. So why subject such "obvious benefits" to even more criticism? With this anthology we will demonstrate why we continually need to challenge what we take for granted, and show with examples how this can be done. The target audience for the book is researchers and educators in various health sciences, as well as students at the Masters degree and PhD levels. Professional practitioners will also find this book of interest.

Evidence-based medicine.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Veterinary medicine --- Evidence-based medicine --- Veterinary Medicine. --- Evidence-Based Medicine.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Evidence-based medicine --- Integrative medicine --- Complementary Therapies. --- Integrative Medicine. --- Evidence-Based Medicine. --- Alternative Medicine

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"The First Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale (FEPS-FS 1.0) is used to assess the degree to which mental health teams deliver specialized care to people experiencing a first episode psychosis. Comprising of a range of evidence-based practices, FEPS-FS 1.0 can be used as an outcome measure for implementation research or as a quality measure for assessing structure and process indicators in health care. First Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale Manual lays out FEPS-FS 1.0 and provides a practical guide for scoring an FEPS program against the criteria set out in the fidelity scale. It is designed to increase the reliability and consistency of ratings across different sites and assessors. The book includes the full First Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale, a definition and rational for each component of FEPS-FS 1.0, a list of data sources to inform the ratings for each component, and decision rules to help score each component correctly. It also includes site interview data-collecting tools including interview guides, a health record abstraction guide, and a site fidelity assessment preparation guide."-- Provided by publisher.

Evidence-based psychiatry. --- Evidence-based medicine --- Psychiatry --- Decision making

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Evidence-based medicine --- Evidence-Based Medicine. --- Evidence-based medicine. --- EBM (Medicine) --- Evidence-based healthcare --- Medicine, Evidence-Based --- Evidence Based Medicine --- Medicine, Evidence Based --- midwifery --- prevention --- treatment --- health --- Clinical medicine --- Systematic reviews (Medical research) --- Decision Support Techniques --- Clinical Medicine --- Evidence-Based Dentistry --- Evidence-Based Nursing --- Decision making --- Evidence-Based Medicine