Listing 1 - 10 of 30 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Dialectic. --- Logic.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Metaphysics --- Ontology. --- Dialectic --- Ontology --- Being --- Philosophy --- Necessity (Philosophy) --- Substance (Philosophy) --- Polarity --- Polarity (Philosophy)
Choose an application
Logic --- Argumentation --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Reasoning --- Thought and thinking --- Methodology
Choose an application
Dialectic (Logic) --- Dialectiek (Logica) --- Dialectique (Logique) --- Logic --- Logica --- Logique --- Logic. --- Argumentation --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Reasoning --- Thought and thinking --- Methodology
Choose an application
Der Widerspruch, den Kant in der Kritik der praktischen Vernunft unter den Titeln "Dialektik" und "Antinomie der praktischen Vernunft" beschreibt, wurde bisher sehr unterschiedlich verstanden. Das Buch dokumentiert zum ersten Mal die enorme Vielfalt der divergierenden Deutungen und bietet eine textorientierte Analyse der Antinomie und ihrer Auflösung, die in vielen Aspekten heute weithin akzeptierten Auslegungen und Bewertungen widerspricht. Die Arbeit zeigt, daß die Antinomie erst möglich wurde, nachdem Kant noch nach 1781 wichtige Korrekturen an den Prinzipien der sittlichen Verpflichtung und Triebfeder vorgenommen hatte. Sie macht deutlich, daß die Antinomie der praktischen Vernunft sich in ihrer Struktur und Funktion charakteristisch von den Antinomien in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft unterscheidet. Hitherto there have been widely differing interpretations of the contradiction which Kant describes in the Critique of Pure Reason under the headings ‘Dialectics’ and ‘Antinomy of Practical Reason’. This volume documents for the first time the enormous variety of diverging interpretations and presents a text-oriented analysis of antinomy and its resolution which in many respects contradicts the interpretations and assessments widely accepted today. The study demonstrates that antinomy only became possible after Kant had undertaken important revisions of the principles of moral obligation and motive after1781.It demonstrates how the antinomy of practical reason characteristically differs from the antinomies in the Critique of Pure Reason in its structure and function.
Antinomy. --- Logic. --- Antinomy --- Logic --- Argumentation --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Reasoning --- Thought and thinking --- Methodology --- Kant, Immanuel,
Choose an application
In 1999 we invited a small number of colleagues to take part in a colloquium - voted to the analysis of argumentative discourse from two kinds of perspective: a dialectical and a rhetorical perspective. Our intention was to start a thorough disc- sion on the commonalities and differences between the two approaches. In this way we hoped to promote the development of analytic tools for dealing with argum- tation in which, in some way or other, the merits of both approaches are combined. The colloquium took place at the University of Amsterdam. In 2000 it was followed by a second colloquium at New York University, and in 2001 by a third one at Northwestern University. We are grateful to all three universities for giving us the chance to organize three exciting and fruitful meetings and we thank Eugene Garver, Eveline T. Feteris, M.A. van Rees, Ralph Johnson, A. Francisca Snoeck Hen- mans, Jose Plug, Bart Garssen, and Leah Polcar, who took part in the discussions but are not represented in this volume, for their critical and useful contributions.
Persuasion (Rhetoric) --- Dialectic. --- Reasoning --- Argumentation --- Dialectique --- Raisonnement --- #KVHA:Retoriek --- #KVHA:Argumentatie --- #KVHA:Dialectiek --- Persuasion (Rhetoric). --- Dialectic --- Rhetoric --- Forensics (Public speaking) --- Oratory --- Polarity --- Polarity (Philosophy) --- Philosophy. --- Social sciences. --- Linguistics. --- Philosophy, general. --- Social Sciences, general. --- Linguistics, general. --- Linguistic science --- Science of language --- Language and languages --- Behavioral sciences --- Human sciences --- Sciences, Social --- Social science --- Social studies --- Civilization --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities
Choose an application
Logic --- 16 --- Argumentation --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Reasoning --- Thought and thinking --- Logica. Kennistheorie. Logische methodiek. Wetenschapsfilosofie --- Methodology --- 16 Logica. Kennistheorie. Logische methodiek. Wetenschapsfilosofie --- Logic - Textbooks
Choose an application
Logic --- Argumentation --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Reasoning --- Thought and thinking --- Methodology --- Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, --- Metaphysics --- History of philosophy --- Hegel, Georg W.F. --- Logic.
Choose an application
Nearly all the works Aristotle (384-322 BCE) prepared for publication are lost; the priceless ones extant are lecture-materials, notes, and memoranda (some are spurious). They can be categorized as practical; logical; physical; metaphysical; on art; other; fragments.
Languages & Literatures --- Greek & Latin Languages & Literatures --- Logic --- Greek literature --- Argumentation --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Reasoning --- Thought and thinking --- Balkan literature --- Byzantine literature --- Classical literature --- Classical philology --- Greek philology --- Methodology
Listing 1 - 10 of 30 | << page >> |
Sort by
|