Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Law --- Sociological jurisprudence. --- Norm (Philosophy) --- Common good. --- Droit --- Sociologie juridique --- Norme (Philosophie) --- Bien commun --- Philosophy --- Philosophie --- Règle de droit --- Règle de droit. --- Philosophie. --- Law - Philosophy

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Open source software is considered by many to be a novelty and the open source movement a revolution. Yet the collaborative creation of knowledge has gone on for as long as humans have been able to communicate. CODE looks at the collaborative model of creativity -- with examples ranging from collective ownership in indigenous societies to free software, academic science, and the human genome project -- and finds it an alternative to proprietary frameworks for creativity based on strong intellectual property rights.Intellectual property rights, argues Rishab Ghosh in his introduction, were ostensibly developed to increase creativity; but today, policy decisions that treat knowledge and art as if they were physical forms of property actually threaten to decrease creativity, limit public access to creativity, and discourage collaborative creativity. "Newton should have had to pay a license fee before being allowed even to see how tall the 'shoulders of giants' were, let alone to stand upon them," he writes.The contributors to CODE, from such diverse fields as economics, anthropology, law, and software development, examine collaborative creativity from a variety of perspectives, looking at new and old forms of creative collaboration and the mechanisms emerging to study them. Discussing the philosophically resonant issues of ownership, property, and the commons, they ask if the increasing application of the language of property rights to knowledge and creativity constitutes a second enclosure movement -- or if the worldwide acclaim for free software signifies a renaissance of the commons. Two concluding chapters offer concrete possibilities for both alternatives, with one proposing the establishment of "positive intellectual rights" to information and another issuing a warning against the threats to networked knowledge posed by globalization.

Alliances stratégiques (Affaires) --- Bien commun --- Strategic alliances (Business). --- Electronic commerce --- Strategic alliances (Business) --- Intellectual property --- Group decision making --- Common good --- International cooperation --- Economic aspects --- E-books --- Group decision making. --- Common good. --- Good, Common --- Public good --- Political science --- Consensus (Social sciences) --- Justice --- Public interest --- Collective decision making --- Decision-making, Group --- Decision making --- Alliances in business --- Business alliances, Strategic --- Corporate alliances --- Strategic business alliances --- Strategic corporate alliances --- Strategic partnerships (Business) --- Partnership --- Business networks --- Cybercommerce --- E-business --- E-commerce --- E-tailing --- eBusiness --- eCommerce --- Electronic business --- Internet commerce --- Internet retailing --- Online commerce --- Web retailing --- Commerce --- Information superhighway --- International cooperation. --- Economic aspects. --- Commerce électronique --- Alliances stratégiques (Affaires) --- Propriété intellectuelle --- Décision de groupe --- Coopération internationale --- Aspect économique --- Group decision-making --- Electronic commerce - International cooperation --- Intellectual property - Economic aspects