Narrow your search
Listing 1 - 10 of 61 << page
of 7
>>
Sort by

Book
IEEE Recommended Practice for Nuclear Power Generating Station (NPGS) Preferred Power Supply (PPS) Reliability
Author:
ISBN: 0738171557 Year: 2012 Publisher: New York, N.Y. : IEEE,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

This recommended practice addresses activities related to preferred power supply (PPS) reliability, including design considerations, analytical studies, operational and maintenance considerations, and interface agreements between a nuclear power generating station (NPGS) and its associated Transmission Entities.


Book
L'énergie nucléaire
Author:
ISBN: 2130622461 Year: 2012 Publisher: Paris (6, avenue Reille 75685) : P.U.F.,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

En termes simples et accessibles, ce livre présente les principes physiques, l'histoire, les développements industriels de l'énergie nucléaire. Plus de vingt-cinq ans après le drame de Tchernobyl et quelques mois après celui de Fukushima, il en discute les atouts et les risques pour pouvoir évaluer correctement les avantages comme les inconvénients.


Book
Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous Recycling of Transuranics in Fast Nuclear Reactors
Authors: ---
ISBN: 9264991778 Year: 2012 Publisher: Paris : OECD Publishing,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Fuel transuranics (TRU) multi-recycling is a mandatory feature if both the resource sustainability and the waste minimisation objectives for future fuel cycles are to be pursued. The resulting TRU transmutation can be implemented in fast neutron spectrum reactors according to two main options commonly referred to as the homogeneous and heterogeneous modes. In this study, the two alternatives have been compared in terms of reactor core feasibility, fuel development and impact on the fuel cycle. The multi-criteria analysis indicates that there are major challenges in minor actinide-loaded fuel development, its experimental validation and possibly in its reprocessing. Both modes of recycling have an impact on the overall fuel cycle, even if at different stages, for example complex target fabrication and handling in the case of heterogeneous recycling and full core fuel fabrication in the case of homogeneous recycling. The study finds that an economic evaluation according to specific implementation scenarios should still be undertaken.  


Book
International Structure for Decommissioning Costing (ISDC) of Nuclear Installations

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Cost estimation for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities can vary considerably in format, content and practice both within and across countries. These differences may have legitimate reasons but make the process of reviewing estimates complicated and the estimates themselves difficult to defend.  Hence, the joint initiative of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Commission (EC) was undertaken to propose a standard itemisation of decommissioning costs either directly for the production of cost estimates or for mapping estimates onto a standard, common structure for purposes of comparison. This report updates the earlier itemisation published in 1999 and takes into account experience accumulated thus far. The revised cost itemisation structure has sought to ensure that all costs within the planned scope of a decommissioning project may be reflected. The report also provides general guidance on developing a decommissioning cost estimate, including detailed advice on using the structure.  


Book
Development of a fault injection-based dependability assessment methodology for digital and I&C systems
Authors: ---
Year: 2012 Publisher: Washington, DC : United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract


Book
Nuclear Fuel Safety Criteria Technical Review (Second Edition)

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Most of the current nuclear fuel safety criteria were established during the 1960s and early 1970s. Although these criteria were validated against experiments with fuel designs available at that time, a number of tests were based on unirradiated fuels. Additional verification was performed as these designs evolved, but mostly with the aim of showing that the new designs adequately complied with existing criteria, and not to establish new limits. In 1996, the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) reviewed existing fuel safety criteria, focusing on new fuel and core designs, new cladding materials and industry manufacturing processes. The results were published in the Nuclear Fuel Safety Criteria Technical Review of 2001. The NEA has since re-examined the criteria. A brief description of each criterion and its rationale are presented in this second edition, which will be of interest to both regulators and industry (fuel vendors, utilities).


Book
Main Benefits from 30 Years of Joint Projects in Nuclear Safety

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

One of the major achievements of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) is the knowledge it has helped to generate through the organisation of joint international research projects. Such projects, primarily in the areas of nuclear safety and radioactive waste management, enable interested countries, on a costsharing basis, to pursue research or the sharing of data with respect to particular areas or issues. Over the years, more than 30 joint projects have been conducted with wide participation of member countries. This report describes the achievements of the OECD/NEA joint projects on nuclear safety research that have been carried out over the past three decades, with a particular focus on thermal-hydraulics, fuel behaviour and severe accidents. It shows that the resolution of specific safety issues in these areas has greatly benefited from the joint projects’ activities and results. It also highlights the added value of international co-operation for maintaining unique experimental infrastructure, preserving skills and generating new knowledge.


Book
Main Benefits from 30 Years of Joint Projects in Nuclear Safety

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

One of the major achievements of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) is the knowledge it has helped to generate through the organisation of joint international research projects. Such projects, primarily in the areas of nuclear safety and radioactive waste management, enable interested countries, on a costsharing basis, to pursue research or the sharing of data with respect to particular areas or issues. Over the years, more than 30 joint projects have been conducted with wide participation of member countries. This report describes the achievements of the OECD/NEA joint projects on nuclear safety research that have been carried out over the past three decades, with a particular focus on thermal-hydraulics, fuel behaviour and severe accidents. It shows that the resolution of specific safety issues in these areas has greatly benefited from the joint projects’ activities and results. It also highlights the added value of international co-operation for maintaining unique experimental infrastructure, preserving skills and generating new knowledge.


Book
International Structure for Decommissioning Costing (ISDC) of Nuclear Installations

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Cost estimation for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities can vary considerably in format, content and practice both within and across countries. These differences may have legitimate reasons but make the process of reviewing estimates complicated and the estimates themselves difficult to defend.  Hence, the joint initiative of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Commission (EC) was undertaken to propose a standard itemisation of decommissioning costs either directly for the production of cost estimates or for mapping estimates onto a standard, common structure for purposes of comparison. This report updates the earlier itemisation published in 1999 and takes into account experience accumulated thus far. The revised cost itemisation structure has sought to ensure that all costs within the planned scope of a decommissioning project may be reflected. The report also provides general guidance on developing a decommissioning cost estimate, including detailed advice on using the structure.  


Book
Nuclear Fuel Safety Criteria Technical Review (Second Edition)

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Most of the current nuclear fuel safety criteria were established during the 1960s and early 1970s. Although these criteria were validated against experiments with fuel designs available at that time, a number of tests were based on unirradiated fuels. Additional verification was performed as these designs evolved, but mostly with the aim of showing that the new designs adequately complied with existing criteria, and not to establish new limits. In 1996, the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) reviewed existing fuel safety criteria, focusing on new fuel and core designs, new cladding materials and industry manufacturing processes. The results were published in the Nuclear Fuel Safety Criteria Technical Review of 2001. The NEA has since re-examined the criteria. A brief description of each criterion and its rationale are presented in this second edition, which will be of interest to both regulators and industry (fuel vendors, utilities).

Listing 1 - 10 of 61 << page
of 7
>>
Sort by