Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Probability theory is a rapidly expanding field and is used in many areas of science and technology. Beginning from a basis of abstract analysis, this mathematics book develops the knowledge needed for advanced students to develop a complex understanding of probability. The first part of the book systematically presents concepts and results from analysis before embarking on the study of probability theory. The initial section will also be useful for those interested in topology, measure theory, real analysis and functional analysis. The second part of the book presents the concepts, methodology.

Probability theory

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Jason Gibson continues examining Z-score calculations in a second segment. Using visual representations, charts and reassuring technique, he guides maths students toward an understanding of statistics.

Distribution (Probability theory)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In his fourth and final segment on z-values, Jason Gibson solves a new problem while reviewing methods. He also emphasizes the importance of understanding normal distribution.

Distribution (Probability theory)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Intended for class use or self-study, the second addition of this text aspires like the first to introduce statistical methodology to a wide audience, simply and intuitively, through resampling from the data at hand. The methodology proceeds from chapter to chapter from the simple to the complex.

Resampling (Statistics) --- Mathematics --- Probability --- Statistics

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"If the number of sample observations n ! 1, the statistic in (1.1) will follow the chi-squared probability distribution with r-1 degrees of freedom. We know that this remarkable result is true only for a simple null hypothesis when a hypothetical distribution is specified uniquely (i.e., the parameter is considered to be known). Until 1934, Pearson believed that the limiting distribution of the statistic in (1.1) will be the same if the unknown parameters of the null hypothesis are replaced by their estimates based on a sample; see, for example, Baird (1983), Plackett (1983, p. 63), Lindley (1996), Rao (2002), and Stigler (2008, p. 266). In this regard, it is important to reproduce the words of Plackett (1983, p. 69) concerning E. S. Pearson's opinion: "I knew long ago that KP (meaning Karl Pearson) used the 'correct' degrees of freedom for (a) difference between two samples and (b) multiple contingency tables. But he could not see that in curve fitting should be got asymptotically into the same category." Plackett explained that this crucial mistake of Pearson arose from to Karl Pearson's assumption "that individual normality implies joint normality." Stigler (2008) noted that this error of Pearson "has left a positive and lasting negative impression upon the statistical world." Fisher (1924) clearly showed 1 2 CHAPTER 1. A HISTORICAL ACCOUNT that the number of degrees of freedom of Pearson's test must be reduced by the number of parameters estimated from the sample"--

Chi-square test. --- Distribution (Probability theory)