Listing 1 - 10 of 13 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Harrier (Jet fighter plane) --- Cold War. --- Falkland Islands War, 1982 --- Air warfare --- Aerial operations, British. --- History
Choose an application
Between 1945 and 1950, the United States had a global nuclear monopoly. The A-bomb transformed the nation's strategic airpower and saw the Air Force displace the Navy at the front line of American defense. In To Kill Nations, Edward Kaplan traces the evolution of American strategic airpower and preparation for nuclear war from this early air-atomic era to a later period (1950-1965) in which the Soviet Union's atomic capability, accelerated by thermonuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, made American strategic assets vulnerable and gradually undermined air-atomic strategy. The shift to mutually assured destruction (MAD) via general nuclear exchange steadily took precedence in strategic thinking and budget allocations. Soon American nuclear-armed airborne bomber fleets shaped for conventionally defined-if implausible, then impossible-victory were supplanted by missile-based forces designed to survive and punish. The Air Force receded from the forefront of American security policy. Kaplan throws into question both the inevitability and preferability of the strategic doctrine of MAD. He looks at the process by which cultural, institutional, and strategic ideas about MAD took shape and makes insightful use of the comparison between generals who thought they could win a nuclear war and the cold institutional logic of the suicide pact that was MAD. Kaplan also offers a reappraisal of Eisenhower's nuclear strategy and diplomacy to make a case for the marginal viability of air-atomic military power even in an era of ballistic missiles.
Nuclear warfare --- Nuclear weapons --- Air warfare --- Air power --- Government policy --- History --- Philosophy --- United States. --- United States --- Military policy.
Choose an application
Based on an innovative theory of international law, Janina Dill's book investigates the effectiveness of international humanitarian law (IHL) in regulating the conduct of warfare. Through a comprehensive examination of the IHL defining a legitimate target of attack, Dill reveals a controversy among legal and military professionals about the 'logic' according to which belligerents ought to balance humanitarian and military imperatives: the logics of sufficiency or efficiency. Law prescribes the former, but increased recourse to international law in US air warfare has led to targeting in accordance with the logic of efficiency. The logic of sufficiency is morally less problematic, yet neither logic satisfies contemporary expectations of effective IHL or legitimate warfare. Those expectations demand that hostilities follow a logic of liability, which proves impracticable. This book proposes changes to international law, but concludes that according to widely shared normative beliefs, on the twenty-first-century battlefield there are no truly legitimate targets.
Air warfare (International law) --- Humanitarian law. --- War (International law) --- Air warfare --- Aerial strategy --- Aerial tactics --- Aerial warfare --- Air strategy --- Air tactics --- Aeronautics, Military --- War --- Air power --- Airplanes, Military --- Hostilities --- International law --- Neutrality --- Humanitarian conventions --- International humanitarian law --- History. --- Law and legislation --- United States. --- AF (Air force) --- Air Force (U.S.) --- U.S.A.F. (Air force) --- United States Air Force --- US Air Force --- USAF (Air force)
Choose an application
Patton, George S. --- Patton, George Smith, --- Patton, Georgie, --- Close air support. --- ULTRA (Intelligence system) --- World War, 1939-1945 --- Campaigns --- Cryptography. --- Military intelligence --- Regimental histories --- United States. --- History. --- Indian code talkers --- Enigma cipher system --- Air support, Close --- Air warfare --- Unified operations (Military science) --- Communications --- Cryptography --- Electronic intelligence
Choose an application
On December 18, 1972, more than one hundred U.S. B-52 bombers flew over North Vietnam to initiate Operation Linebacker II. During the next eleven days, sixteen of these planes were shot down and another four suffered heavy damage. These losses soon proved so devastating that Strategic Air Command was ordered to halt the bombing. The U.S. Air Force's poor performance in this and other operations during Vietnam was partly due to the fact that they had trained their pilots according to methods devised during World War II and the Korean War, when strategic bombers attacking targets were expected t
Air power --- War games --- Flight training --- Air pilots, Military --- Air warfare --- Air superiority --- Military power --- Aeronautics, Military --- Military readiness --- Kriegsspiel --- War --- Wargames --- Military art and science --- Military maneuvers --- Simulation games --- Tactics --- Flight instruction --- Flying classes --- Aeronautics --- Airplanes --- Flight schools --- Military air pilots --- Air pilots --- History. --- Training of --- Mathematical models --- Study and teaching --- Piloting --- United States. --- AF (Air force) --- Air Force (U.S.) --- U.S.A.F. (Air force) --- United States Air Force --- US Air Force --- USAF (Air force) --- Officers --- Luftmagt --- Flyvetræning --- USA
Choose an application
During the past decade, armed drones have entered the American military arsenal as a core tactic for countering terrorism. When coupled with access to reliable information, they make it possible to deploy lethal force accurately across borders while keeping one's own soldiers out of harm's way. The potential to direct force with great precision also offers the possibility of reducing harm to civilians. At the same time, because drones eliminate some of the traditional constraints on the use of force-like the need to gain political support for full mobilization-they lower the threshold for launching military strikes. The development of drone use capacity across dozens of countries increases the need for global standards on the use of these weapons to assure that their deployment is strategically wise and ethically and legally sound. Presenting a robust conversation among leading scholars in the areas of international legal standards, counterterrorism strategy, humanitarian law, and the ethics of force, Drones and the Future of Armed Conflict takes account of current American drone campaigns and the developing legal, ethical, and strategic implications of this new way of warfare. Among the contributions to this volume are a thorough examination of the American government's legal justifications for the targeting of enemies using drones, an analysis of American drone campaigns' notable successes and failures, and a discussion of the linked issues of human rights, freedom of information, and government accountability.
Aeronautics, Military --- Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles. --- Military ethics --- Air warfare (International law) --- Law and legislation --- engineering, international law, world politics, armed conflict, high tech weapons, technology, modern warfare, drones, american military arsenal, countering terrorism, lethal force, across borders, soldiers, ground forces, harm to civilians, political support, full mobilization, drone strikes, global standards, ethics, morality, counterterrorism strategy, humanitarian issues, legal justifications, human rights, government accountability, freedom of information, uninhabited combat aerial vehicles, aeronautics.
Choose an application
Drones are the iconic military technology of many of today's most pressing conflicts. Drones have captured the public imagination, partly because they project lethal force in a manner that challenges accepted norms and moral understandings. Drone Wars presents a series of essays by legal scholars, journalists, government officials, military analysts, social scientists, and foreign policy experts. It addresses drones' impact on the ground, how their use adheres to and challenges the laws of war, their relationship to complex policy challenges, and the ways they help us understand the future of war. The book is a diverse and comprehensive interdisciplinary perspective on drones that covers important debates on targeted killing and civilian casualties, presents key data on drone deployment, and offers new ideas on their historical development, significance, and impact on law and policy.
Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles --- Afghan War, 2001 --- -Afghan War, 2001 --- -Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles --- Avions de combat sans pilote --- Guerre en Afghanistan, 2001 --- -Guerre en Afghanistan, 2001 --- -Avions de combat sans pilote --- Law and legislation --- Aerial operations --- Droit --- Opérations aériennes --- Etats-Unis --- Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles (International law) --- -Uninhabited combat aerial vehiclesLaw and legislation --- Guerre en Afghānistān, 2001 --- -Guerre en Afghānistān, 2001 --- Opérations aériennes --- Afghan War, 2001-2021 --- Law and legislation. --- Aerial operations. --- Afghan War, 2001- - Law and legislation --- Afghan War, 2001- - Aerial operations --- Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles - United States --- -Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001 --- -War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- Air warfare (International law) --- UCAVs (Military science) --- Combat drone aircraft --- Airplanes, Military --- Drone aircraft
Choose an application
World War II is usually seen as a titanic land battle, decided by mass armies, most importantly those on the Eastern Front. Phillips Payson O'Brien shows us the war in a completely different light. In this compelling new history of the Allied path to victory, he argues that in terms of production, technology and economic power, the war was far more a contest of air and sea than land supremacy. He shows how the Allies developed a predominance of air and sea power which put unbearable pressure on Germany and Japan's entire war-fighting machine from Europe and the Mediterranean to the Pacific. Air and sea power dramatically expanded the area of battle and allowed the Allies to destroy over half the Axis' equipment before it had even reached the traditional 'battlefield'. Battles such as El Alamein, Stalingrad and Kursk did not win World War II; air and sea power did.
Air power -- History -- 19th century -- Case studies. --- Air power -- History -- 20th century -- Case studies. --- Sea-power -- History -- 20th century -- Case studies. --- World war, 1939-1945 -- Campaigns. --- World War, 1939-1945 --- Air power --- Sea power --- History & Archaeology --- History - General --- Air superiority --- Military power --- Aeronautics, Military --- Military readiness --- Air warfare --- European War, 1939-1945 --- Second World War, 1939-1945 --- World War 2, 1939-1945 --- World War II, 1939-1945 --- World War Two, 1939-1945 --- WW II (World War, 1939-1945) --- WWII (World War, 1939-1945) --- History, Modern --- Campaigns --- History --- Aerial operations --- Naval operations --- Battles, sieges, etc. --- Military operations --- Sea-power --- Campaigns. --- Aerial operations. --- Naval operations. --- Dominion of the sea --- Naval policy --- Navy --- Sea, Dominion of the --- Seapower --- Naval art and science --- Naval history --- Naval strategy --- Navies
Choose an application
Today, strategic aerial bombardments of urban areas that harm civilians, at times intentionally, are becoming increasingly common in global conflicts. This book reveals the history of these tactics as employed by nations that initiated aerial bombardments of civilians after World War I and during World War II. As one of the major symbols of German suffering, the Allied bombing left a strong imprint on German society. Bas von Benda-Beckmann explores how German historical accounts reflected debates on postwar identity and looks at whether the history of the air war forms a counternarrative against the idea of German collective guilt. Provocative and unflinching, this study offers a valuable contribution to German historiography.
Bombing, Aerial --- Bombing, Aerial. --- Destruction and pillage. --- Geschichtsschreibung. --- Historians --- Historians. --- Luftkrieg. --- Weltkrieg --- World War, 1939-1945 --- History --- Destruction and pillage --- World War (1939-1945). --- 1939-1945. --- Deutschland. --- Germany. --- History. --- Aerial bombing --- Air strikes --- Airstrikes --- Air warfare --- Bombardment --- Bombers --- Luftkrieg --- Geschichtsschreibung --- HISTORY --- General. --- Western. --- BMBF-Statusseminar --- 1939-1945 --- Annals --- Auxiliary sciences of history --- Deutschland --- BMB+F Statusseminar --- World War II Period --- Historiographers --- Scholars --- Alemania --- Ashkenaz --- BRD --- Bu̇gd Naĭramdakh German Uls --- Bundesrepublik Deutschland --- Deutsches Reich --- Doitsu --- Doitsu Renpō Kyōwakoku --- Federal Republic of Germany --- Federalʹna Respublika Nimechchyny --- FRN --- German Uls --- Germania --- Germanii︠a︡ --- Germanyah --- Gjermani --- Grossdeutsches Reich --- Jirmānīya --- KhBNGU --- Kholboony Bu̇gd Naĭramdakh German Uls --- Nimechchyna --- Repoblika Federalin'i Alemana --- República de Alemania --- República Federal de Alemania --- Republika Federal Alemmana --- Vācijā --- Veĭmarskai︠a︡ Respublika --- Weimar Republic --- Weimarer Republik --- ХБНГУ --- Германия --- جرمانيا --- ドイツ --- ドイツ連邦共和国 --- ドイツ レンポウ キョウワコク --- Germany (East) --- Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945-1955) --- Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945-1955 : British Zone) --- Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945-1955 : French Zone) --- Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945-1955 : Russian Zone) --- Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945-1955 : U.S. Zone) --- Germany (West) --- Holy Roman Empire --- European War, 1939-1945 --- Second World War, 1939-1945 --- World War 2, 1939-1945 --- World War II, 1939-1945 --- World War Two, 1939-1945 --- WW II (World War, 1939-1945) --- WWII (World War, 1939-1945) --- History, Modern --- Historiography. --- Allied bombings Historiography Second World War Germany.
Choose an application
A team of U.S. and international experts assesses the impact of various nations' airpower efforts during the 2011 conflict in Libya, including NATO allies and non-NATO partners, and how their experiences offer guidance for future conflicts. In addition to the roles played by the United States, Britain and France, it examines the efforts of Italy, Canada, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Qatar, the UAE, and the Libyan rebels.
Air power -- History -- 20th century. --- Air power -- History -- 21st century. --- Libya -- History -- Civil war, 2011- -- Aerial operations. --- Libya -- History -- Civil war, 2011- -- Campaigns. --- Air power --- History --- Libya --- Aerial operations. --- Campaigns. --- Air superiority --- Military power --- Lībiyā --- Jamāhīrīyah al-ʻArabīyah al-Lībīyah al-Shaʻbīyah al-Ishtirākīyah --- Libyan Arab Jamahiriya --- Jamahiriya arabe libyenne --- Libyen --- Libia --- Livii︠a︡ --- Popular Socialist Libyan Arab Jamahiriya --- Libië --- Socialist People's Arab Jamahiriya --- Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya --- Luv --- Libye --- Jamahiriya arabe libyenne populaire socialiste --- Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya --- Gran Jamahiriya araba libica socialista popolare --- SPLAJ --- G.S.P.L.A.J. --- GSPLAJ --- Jamāhīrīyah al-ʻUẓmá --- Jamahiriya al-Arabiya al-Libiya al-Shabiya al-Ishtirakiya al-Uzma --- Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Republic --- Grande Jamahiriya arabe populaire socialiste libyenne --- Mamlakah al-Lībīyah al-Muttaḥidah --- Grand Jamahiriya arabe libyenne populaire socialiste --- Aeronautics, Military --- Military readiness --- Air warfare --- Jamahiriya Arab Libyan Popular Socialist --- State of Libya --- Dawiat Libiya --- リビア --- Ribia --- ليبيا --- לוב --- Airpower --- Luftmagt --- Borgerkrig
Listing 1 - 10 of 13 | << page >> |
Sort by
|