Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
In this work drawn from lectures delivered in 1994 a founding figure of cultural studies reflects on the divisive, deadly consequences of our politics of identification. Stuart Hall untangles the power relations that permeate race, ethnicity, and nationhood and shows how oppressed groups broke apart old hierarchies of difference in Western culture.
Choose an application
Identities are not something we are born with, Hall argues, but are formed and transformed in the discourses of nation, ethnicity, and race. Casting his glance over the modern age, he shows how the imperial view of civilized-versus-barbarian gave way to a politics of identification that grew ever more unpredictable under late 20th century conditions of globalization. Race was long ago discredited by science yet it persists because it operates as a signifier, making meanings out of the binary representation of difference. From Renaissance to Enlightenment, stability prevailed in a West-centric order that fixed "their difference" against "our modernity," but the multi-accentual slide of signifiers also gave rise to new identities among subordinated subjects as well. Ethnicities that exclude others close down the multiple voicing built into every discourse, whereas Hall shows that "black" took on alternative meaning when Caribbean and South Asian migrants fought racism through alliances based not on genetic or cultural grounds but by opening the signifying chain to recodings. Migration is today at the heart of the contradictory tensions thrown up by global dislocations that have unsettled traditional bonds of collective belonging, although when nations make the rights of citizenship conditional on cultural homogeniety what Hall reveals is the extent to which liberal democracy's universalist values were grounded in an assimilationist worldview that has yet to be fully dismantled.--
Ethnicity --- Race --- Ethnocentrism --- Nation-state and globalization --- Political aspects --- Ethnicity. --- Ethnocentrism. --- Nation-state and globalization. --- Political aspects. --- Race - Political aspects
Choose an application
Are American colleges and universities failing their students by refusing to teach the philosophical traditions of China, India, Africa, and other non-Western cultures? This biting and provocative critique of American higher education says yes. Even though we live in an increasingly multicultural world, most philosophy departments stubbornly insist that only Western philosophy is real philosophy and denigrate everything outside the European canon. In Taking Back Philosophy, Bryan W. Van Norden lambastes academic philosophy for its Eurocentrism, insularity, and complicity with nationalism and issues a ringing call to make our educational institutions live up to their cosmopolitan ideals. In a cheeky, agenda-setting, and controversial style, Van Norden, an expert in Chinese philosophy, proposes an inclusive, multicultural approach to philosophical inquiry. He showcases several accessible examples of how Western and Asian thinkers can be brought into productive dialogue, demonstrating that philosophy only becomes deeper as it becomes increasingly diverse and pluralistic. Taking Back Philosophy is at once a manifesto for multicultural education, an accessible introduction to Confucian and Buddhist philosophy, a critique of the ethnocentrism and anti-intellectualism characteristic of much contemporary American politics, a defense of the value of philosophy and a liberal arts education, and a call to return to the search for the good life that defined philosophy for Confucius, Socrates, and the Buddha. Building on a popular New York Times opinion piece that suggested any philosophy department that fails to teach non-Western philosophy should be renamed a "Department of European and American Philosophy," this book will challenge any student or scholar of philosophy to reconsider what constitutes the love of wisdom.
Philosophy. --- Mental philosophy --- Humanities --- 08.10 non-western philosophy. --- Interkulturelle Philosophie. --- Philosophy --- History of philosophy --- philosophy --- higher education --- ethnocentrism --- multiculturalism --- America
Choose an application
Postkoloniale Denkmuster, Nationalismus, Ethnozentrismus und Rassismus gehören in den Kontext einer Nation, die Geschichte, Kultur und Identität in einen Sinnzusammenhang bringt. Der Band zeigt: Die zunehmende kulturelle Pluralisierung der Gesellschaften erfordert die Bereitschaft zu dialogischen Begegnungen, die letztlich alle verändern. Dies nicht als Verlust, sondern als den Beginn von etwas Neuem zu erleben, scheint die Herausforderung der Zukunft zu sein. Die Beiträger_innen, darunter Kien Nghi Ha, Ram A. Mall und Bea Lundt, stellen Analysen, Deutungen und Perspektiven vor, wie erste Schritte in eine solche Zukunft aussehen könnten. Dem Band ist ein Streitgespräch mit Jörn Rüsen beigefügt, der den hier vertretenen Ansätzen kritisch begegnet. Besprochen in: IDA-NRW, 1 (2017) www.amazon.de, 18.04.2017, Johannes Heinrichs BZgA-InfoDienst Migration, 2 (2017) XTRA!, 334 (2017)
Postkolonialismus; Nationalismus; Ethnozentrismus; Neorassismus; Pluralisierung; Bildung; Rassismus; Bildungssoziologie; Migration; Soziologie; Postcolonialism; Nationalism; Ethnocentrism; New Racism; Pluralization; Education; Racism; Sociology of Education; Sociology --- Germany --- Europe --- Emigration and immigration --- Race relations --- Education. --- Ethnocentrism. --- Migration. --- Nationalism. --- New Racism. --- Pluralization. --- Racism. --- Sociology of Education. --- Sociology.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|