Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Historic buildings --- Law and legislation --- Bush, George W. --- Homes and haunts
Choose an application
Historic buildings --- Law and legislation --- Bush, George W. --- Homes and haunts
Choose an application
In Angry Public Rhetorics, Celeste Condit explores emotions as motivators and organizers of collective action-a theory that treats humans as "symbol-using animals" to understand the patterns of leadership in global affairs-to account for the way in which anger produced similar rhetorics in three ideologically diverse voices surrounding 9/11: Osama bin Laden, President George W. Bush, and Susan Sontag. These voices show that anger is more effective for producing some collective actions, such as rallying supporters, reifying existing worldviews, motivating attack, enforcing shared norms, or threatening from positions of power; and less effective for others, like broadening thought, attracting new allies, adjudicating justice across cultural norms, or threatening from positions of weakness. Because social anger requires shared norms, collectivized anger cannot serve social justice. In order for anger to be a force for global justice, the world's peoples must develop shared norms to direct discussion of international relations. Angry Public Rhetorics provides guidance for such public forums.
Rhetoric --- Anger --- September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001. --- International relations --- Political aspects. --- Social aspects. --- Bin Laden, Osama, --- Bush, George W. --- Sontag, Susan,
Choose an application
"The volume explores crisis rhetoric in contemporary U.S. American presidential speechmaking. Rhetorical leadership constitutes an inherent feature of the modern presidency. Particularly during times of critical events, the president is expected to react and address the nation. However, the power of the office also allows him or her to direct attention to particular topics and thus rhetorically create or exploit the notion of crisis. This monograph examines the verbal responses of George W. Bush and Barack Obama to pressing issues during their terms in office. Assuming an interdisciplinary approach, it illuminates the characteristics of modern crisis rhetoric. The aim of the book is to show that elements of Puritan rhetoric, and specifically the tradition of the jeremiad, although taken out of their original context and modified to suit a modern multiethnic society, can still be detected in contemporary political communication. It will be of interest to students and scholars of presidential rhetoric, political communication, sociolinguistics and cultural studies" --
Discourse analysis --- Rhetoric --- Presidents --- Jeremiads --- Communication in politics --- Political aspects --- History. --- Language --- Bush, George W. --- Obama, Barack. --- Political communication --- Political science --- Laments --- Sermons --- Presidency --- Heads of state --- Executive power --- Language and languages --- Speaking --- Authorship --- Expression --- Literary style --- Discourse grammar --- Text grammar --- Semantics --- Semiotics --- Obama, Barack Hussein --- Bush, George, --- Bush, Geo, --- Bush, Dzhordzh Uoker, --- Bush, Dzh. U. --- Bush, Dzh. --- Bush, --- Bushi, Qiaozhi W., --- Bush, Zhorzh, --- Arbusto, Jorge W., --- Bush, Xhorxh W., --- Obama, Barack
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|