Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Law --- Sociolinguistics --- Translation science --- European Court of Human Rights

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Human rights --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) --- European Court of Human Rights.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book addresses the question of social constitutionalism, especially with regard to its role in the contemporary European project. For reasons of history and democracy, Europeans share a deep commitment to social constitutionalism. But in the contemporary European constitutional debate, constitutionalism and social democracy have become antagonists, with the survival of the one seeming to require sacrifice of the other. This book challenges the common view that constitutionalization means de-politicization. It argues that courts can exert a more indirect, creative, and agenda-setting role in the process of an ongoing clarification of the meaning of a right. The CJEU and the ECtHR - as courts beyond the nation state - are able to constructively re-open and re-politicize controversies that may appear settled at the national level in their constitutionalizing jurisprudence. And, crucially, our understanding of shared European constitutional principles is itself subject to revision and reconsideration as we accumulate experiences of dealing with diverse national contexts. 0By examining the jurisprudence of the CJEU and the ECtHR, the book demonstrates that in domain after domain, ranging from the protection of the vulnerable in the European social market to the guarantee of freedom of conscience, which in Europe emerged after many centuries of religious persecution, both courts can enhance and deepen democracy and thereby encourage the liberal project of constitutionalism beyond the state. Over time, once interpretive answers have become established in practice, courts can then move towards stronger forms of judicial intervention that consolidate best practice. It is this democratic and experimental process which lies at the heart of the distinctive model of contemporary Euroconstitutionalism.

Constitutional law --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- Social aspects --- Interpretation and construction --- European Court of Human Rights --- Court of Justice of the European Union --- Constitutional law - Social aspects - Europe

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

L'étude comparée de la jurisprudence des Cours européenne et interaméricaine des droits de l’homme en matière d’interprétation conventionnelle, comprise comme le processus, la recherche du sens à donner aux Conventions (et non son résultat) fait ressortir deux choses. Elle démontre tout d’abord l’inexistence d’une herméneutique commune. Si les Cours s’appuient sur la particularité des deux Conventions au regard du droit international général pour légitimer l’élaboration d’une démarche herméneutique spécifique, il existe de véritables différences méthodologiques entre elles. Elle révèle ensuite un mouvement de rapprochement des solutions jurisprudentielles adoptées, dont le rythme peut être comparé à celui d’une valse à trois temps. Le premier est marqué par le développement de l'herméneutique européenne ; le deuxième consiste en la reprise de ce patrimoine interprétatif par la Cour interaméricaine, qui l’adapte néanmoins à ses spécificités ; le troisième, enfin, consiste en une convergence de la jurisprudence des deux Cours, qui est bien souvent davantage le fait de la Cour européenne que celui de la Cour interaméricaine. Cette valse révèle un phénomène de syncrétisme interprétatif. Les Cours élaborent et réadaptent continuellement leur démarche à partir de la «fusion» de différentes «doctrines» ou «éléments culturels» dont elles s’enrichissent réciproquement, mais elle reste ancrée dans chaque système. Le syncrétisme, lui-même issu d’un double mouvement d’approfondissement de chaque système dans sa propre vision et d’ouverture sur d’autres, semble alors s’inscrire dans une certaine recherche de l’universel.

Human rights --- European law --- European Court of Human Rights --- Inter-American Court of Human Rights [San José] --- Droits de l'homme (droit européen) --- Droits de l'homme (droit international) --- Jurisprudence --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme --- Cour interaméricaine des droits de l'homme --- Conseil de l'Europe. --- Convention américaine relative aux droits de l'homme --- Droit comparé --- Human rights. --- International human rights courts. --- Interpretation and construction --- European Court of Human Rights. --- Inter-American Court of Human Rights. --- Interpretation and construction. --- Comparative law --- Tribunaux internationaux des droits de l'homme --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) --- Tribunaux internationaux des droits de l'homme. --- Interprétation. --- Conseil de l'Europe --- Cour interaméricaine des droits de l'homme. --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. --- Convention américaine relative aux droits de l'homme. --- Droit comparé. --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) - Amérique - Interprétation. --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) - Europe - Interprétation. --- Human rights - America - Interpretation and construction. --- Human rights - Europe - Interpretation and construction. --- Conseil de l'Europe - Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales (1950) - Jurisprudence --- Inter-American Court of Human Rights --- Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales (1950) --- Conseil de l'Europe - Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales (1950)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Core Socio-Economic Rights and the European Court of Human Rights deals with socio-economic rights in the context of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The book connects the ECtHR's socio-economic case law to an understanding of the Court's responsibility to recognize the limitations of supranational rights adjudication while protecting the most needy. By exploring the idea of core rights protection in constitutional and international law, a new perspective is developed that offers suggestions for improving the ECtHR's reasoning in socio-economic cases as well as contributing to the debate on indivisible rights adjudication in an age of 'rights inflation' and proportionality review. Core Socio-Economic Rights and the European Court of Human Rights will interest scholars and practitioners dealing with fundamental rights and especially those interested in judicial reasoning, socio-economic and supranational rights protection.

Human rights --- Social rights --- Socio-economic rights --- Socioeconomic rights --- Basic needs --- Law and legislation --- European Court of Human Rights. --- European Commission of Human Rights --- C.E.D.O. --- CEDO --- CEDU --- ECtHR --- Avrupa İnsan Hakları Dîvanı --- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme --- Tribunal Europeo de Derechos del Hombre --- Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos --- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte --- Evropeĭskiĭ Sud po pravam cheloveka --- Европейский Суд по правам человека --- Council of Europe. --- Corte europea dei diritti dell'uomo --- Eurōpaiko Dikastērio Anthrōpinōn Dikaiōmatōn --- Ευρωπαικό Δικαστήριο Ανθρώπινων Δικαιωμάτων --- Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului --- Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka --- Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi --- Evropský soud pro lidská práva --- I︠E︡vropeĭsʹkyĭ Sud z prav li︠u︡dyny --- Європейський Суд з прав людини --- Evropeĭski sŭd po pravata na choveka --- Европейски съд по правата на човека --- Europos Žmogaus teisių teismas --- Mardu iravunkʻneri evropakan dataran --- İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi --- Evropski sud za ljudska prava --- Европски суд за људска права --- AİHM --- Gjykata Europiane për të Drejtat e Njeriut --- GJEDNJ --- EGMR --- Euroopa Inimõiguste Kohus --- Socio-economic rights.