TY - BOOK ID - 50590909 TI - Structural Control of Mineral Deposits. Theory and Reality PY - 2019 SN - 3038977853 3038977845 PB - MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute DB - UniCat KW - shallow diagenesis KW - arsenopyrite KW - buffer-based analysis KW - vein-filling KW - textures KW - hydrothermal breccia KW - Pyrenean Axial Zone KW - Tibet KW - remobilization KW - pull-apart KW - spatial analysis KW - tectonic control KW - thrust fault KW - silicic large igneous province KW - hinge trap KW - hydraulic breccia KW - vein KW - exploration KW - mafic dikes KW - Tiegelongnan KW - orogenic gold mineralization KW - porphyry KW - base metal massive sulfide deposits KW - overprinting KW - deformation bands KW - clay authigenesis KW - fractal KW - uranium deposits KW - replacement KW - sphalerite KW - Tongling KW - comb quartz KW - strike-slip fault KW - pre-existing structures KW - preservation KW - ignimbrite flare-ups KW - dilational jogs KW - Pb-Zn deposits KW - deformation structure KW - silicification KW - SEDEX KW - fault zones KW - Verkhoyansk-Kolyma folded region KW - decollement KW - structural control KW - IRGD KW - Khangalas ore cluster KW - infilling KW - breccia KW - late Variscan strike-slip faults KW - data-driven model KW - mineralization chronology KW - shear zone KW - epithermal KW - structure KW - Hajjar KW - orogenic gold KW - Kiggavik KW - sulphide lenses KW - Anti-Atlas KW - ash-flow caldera UR - https://www.unicat.be/uniCat?func=search&query=sysid:50590909 AB - ""Structural Control"" remains a crucial point that frequently lacks in any scientific and/or economic analysis of ore deposits, whatever their type and class. The case of lode deposits is exemplary, although also other deposits, like breccia pipe, stockwerk, massive sulphides, skarn, etc., can, surprisingly, be concerned. Several concepts like the gold-bearing shear zone have not proven valid during the last few decades in terms of our understanding of gold deposit and have been totally abandoned. Additionally, the relationships between magmatism, regional tectonic context, and mineralization remain uncertain and have been debated in several recent publications. This demonstrates that this issue is still relevant, and its solution may help in the distinction between intrusion-related and orogenic deposits. In this Special Issue, we particularly invite any case study of mineral deposits, in which it has been demonstrated that structural geology may have a significant role in the establishment of the deposit model of formation and/or on exploration and exploitation programs. Examples in which the structural model diverges from those described in the classical literature are particularly welcomed, including studies in which relationships with magmatism can be suspected and/or demonstrated. Indeed, all cases that illustrate concepts that differ from the classic ones and from theoretical models may represent significant contributions to this volume. ER -