TY - BOOK ID - 65195585 TI - Cognition in 3E: Emergent, Embodied, Extended : Multidisciplinary Perspectives PY - 2020 SN - 3030463397 3030463389 PB - Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, DB - UniCat KW - Cognition. KW - Psychology KW - Philosophy of mind. KW - Cognitive psychology. KW - Computational complexity. KW - Artificial intelligence. KW - Philosophy of Mind. KW - Cognitive Psychology. KW - Complexity. KW - Artificial Intelligence. KW - AI (Artificial intelligence) KW - Artificial thinking KW - Electronic brains KW - Intellectronics KW - Intelligence, Artificial KW - Intelligent machines KW - Machine intelligence KW - Thinking, Artificial KW - Bionics KW - Cognitive science KW - Digital computer simulation KW - Electronic data processing KW - Logic machines KW - Machine theory KW - Self-organizing systems KW - Simulation methods KW - Fifth generation computers KW - Neural computers KW - Complexity, Computational KW - Psychology, Cognitive KW - Mind, Philosophy of KW - Mind, Theory of KW - Theory of mind KW - Philosophy KW - Metaphysics KW - Philosophical anthropology UR - https://www.unicat.be/uniCat?func=search&query=sysid:65195585 AB - This book originated at a workshop by the same name held in May 2018 at the University of Pavia. The aim was to encourage a cross-disciplinary discussion on the limits of cognition. When venturing into cognitive science, notwithstanding the approach, one of the first riddles to be solved is the definition of cognition. Any definition immediately sparks the ascription debate: who/what cognizes? Definitions may appear either too loose, or too demanding. Are bacteria included? What about plants? Is it a human prerogative? We engage in the quest for artificial intelligence, but is artificial cognition already the case? And if it was a human prerogative, are we doing it all the time? Is cognition a process, or the sum of countless sub processes? Is it in the brain, or also in the body? Or does it go beyond the body? Where does it start? Where does it end? We tried answering these questions each from our own perspectives, as philosophers, ethnographers, psychologists and rhetoricians, handing each other our peculiar insight. ER -