Listing 11 - 13 of 13 << page
of 2
>>
Sort by

Book
Utiliser Wikipédia comme source d'information fiable
Author:
ISSN: 24922331 ISBN: 9791092272123 Year: 2016 Volume: *1 Publisher: Bois Guillaume : Éditions Klog,

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

"L'encyclopédie collaborative en ligne Wikipédia est devenue depuis sa création une source d'information incontournable pour la plupart des internautes. Mais la fiabilité de l'information présente dans ce projet d'encyclopédie libre est source de nombreux débats et controverses. Comment l'encyclopédie collaborative est-elle conçue, de quelle manière les contributeurs participent-ils à son enrichissement, comment l'information est-elle contrôlée et vérifiée? De quels outils disposent les Wikipédiens pour garantir la fiabilité d'une information en constante réactualisation? Telles sont quelques-unes des questions qui trouveront une réponse dans cet ouvrage résolument pratique."--Page 4 de la couverture.


Book
Good faith collaboration
Author:
ISBN: 9780262014472 0262014475 0262518201 9786612899294 0262289717 1282899295 9780262289719 9780262518208 9781282899292 Year: 2010 Publisher: Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a community - a community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture. Wikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H.G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technology-which at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential. Wikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open content community. Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia."--Jacket.

Listing 11 - 13 of 13 << page
of 2
>>
Sort by