Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
In hoeverre houdt Facebook ons een spiegel voor? Wat is de relatie tussen statusangst en statusupdates? En hoe kunnen we ons verhouden tot al die geweldige Facebookvrienden? In De virtuele spiegel schetst Koen Damhuis (1987) het portret van zijn eigen generatie, de Facebookgeneratie, die digitaal meer en meer met elkaar deelt, maar achter de perfecte zelfbeelden vooral vecht tegen zichzelf. Stap voor stap ontleedt hij de oprukkende kijk-en-vergelijkcultuur. Zijn analyse roept de vraag op of we niet vaker de ogen moeten sluiten om te zien wat er werkelijk toe doet (bron: arbeiderspers.nl)
imago --- virtuele communicatie --- Computer architecture. Operating systems --- sociale netwerken --- Social psychology --- zelfbeeld --- sociale psychologie --- Philosophy and psychology of culture --- sociale media --- Mass communications --- #SBIB:309H103 --- #SBIB:316.7C121 --- facebook --- Sociologie --- Web 2.0 --- Mediatechnologie / ICT / digitale media: sociale en culturele aspecten --- Cultuursociologie: gedragspatronen, levensstijl --- Beeldcultuur --- Facebook --- Privacy --- Sociale netwerken --- internet --- Beeldcultuur. --- Facebook. --- internet. --- Internet.
Choose an application
This ground-breaking text systematically investigate the heterogeneity of radical right-wing voters.
Right and left (Political science) --- Voting research. --- Wilders, Geert. --- Le Pen, Marine. --- Voting --- Voting behavior research --- Elections --- Left (Political science) --- Left and right (Political science) --- Right (Political science) --- Political science --- Research --- Pen, Marine le --- Le Pen, Marion Anne Perrine, --- Wilders, Geert --- Le Pen, Marine
Choose an application
"Trump, Wilders, Salvini, Le Pen - during the last decades, radical right-wing leaders and their parties have become important political forces in most western democracies. Their growing appeal raises an increasingly relevant question: who are the voters that support them and why do they do so? Numerous and variegated answers have been given to this question, inside as well as outside academia. Yet, curiously, despite their quantity and diversity, these existing explanations are often based on a similar assumption: that of homogeneous electorates. Consequently, the idea that different subgroups with different profiles and preferences might coexist within the constituencies of radical right-wing parties has thus far remained underdeveloped, both theoretically and empirically. This ground-breaking book is the first one that systematically investigates the heterogeneity of radical right-wing voters. Theoretically, it introduces the concept of electoral equifinality to come to grips with this diversity. Empirically, it relies on innovative statistical analyses and no less than 125 life-history interviews with voters in France and the Netherlands. Based on this unique material, the study identifies different roads to the radical right and compares them within a cross-national perspective. In addition, through an analysis of almost 1400 tweets posted by Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen, the book shows how the latter are able to appeal to different groups of voters. Taken together, the book thus provides a host of ground-breaking insights into the heterogeneous phenomenon of radical right support"--
Right and left (Political science) --- Voting research --- Wilders, Geert --- Le Pen, Marine --- Political sociology --- Political parties --- France --- Netherlands
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|