Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Zoopolis offers a new agenda for the theory and practice of animal rights. Most animal rights theory focuses on the intrinsic capacities or interests of animals, and the moral status and moral rights that these intrinsic characteristics give rise to. Zoopolis shifts the debate from the real of moral theory and applied ethics to the realm of political theory, focusing on the relational obligations that arise from the varied ways that animals relate to human societies and institutions. Building on recent developments in the political theory of group-differentiated citizenship, Zoopolis introduces us to the genuine "political animal." It argues that different types of animals stand in different relationships to human political communities. Domesticated animals should be seen as full members of human-animal mixed communities, participating in the cooperative project of shared citizenship. Wilderness animals, by contrast, form their own sovereign communities entitled to protection against colonization, invasion, domination, and other threats to self-determination. "Liminal" animals who are wild but live in the midst of human settlement (such as crows or raccoons) should be seen as "denizens", residents of our societies, but not fully included in rights and responsibilities of citizenship. To all of these animals we owe respect for their basic inviolable rights, but we inevitably and appropriately have very different relations with them, with different types of obligations. Humans and animals are inextricably bound in a complex web of relationships, and Zoopolis offers an original and profoundly affirmative vision of how to ground this complex web of relations on principles of justice and compassion.
Animal rights. --- Human-animal relationships --- Animaux --- Relations homme-animal --- Mouvement pour la défense des droits des animaux --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Droits --- Aspect moral --- Aspect politique --- Animal rights --- Animal-human relationships --- Animal-man relationships --- Animals and humans --- Human beings and animals --- Man-animal relationships --- Relationships, Human-animal --- Animals --- Animal liberation --- Animals' rights --- Rights of animals --- Animal welfare --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Mouvements pour la défense des droits des animaux --- Droits. --- Aspect moral. --- Aspect politique. --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Social ethics --- Human-animal relationships - Moral and ethical aspects --- Mouvements pour la défense des droits des animaux
Choose an application
Zoopolis offers a new agenda for the theory and practice of animal rights. Most animal rights theory focuses on the intrinsic capacities or interests of animals, and the moral status and moral rights that these intrinsic characteristics give rise to. Zoopolis shifts the debate from the real of moral theory and applied ethics to the realm of political theory, focusing on the relational obligations that arise from the varied ways that animals relate to human societies and institutions. Building on recent developments in the political theory of group-differentiated citizenship, Zoopolis introduces us to the genuine "political animal." It argues that different types of animals stand in different relationships to human political communities. Domesticated animals should be seen as full members of human-animal mixed communities, participating in the cooperative project of shared citizenship. Wilderness animals, by contrast, form their own sovereign communities entitled to protection against colonization, invasion, domination, and other threats to self-determination. "Liminal" animals who are wild but live in the midst of human settlement (such as crows or raccoons) should be seen as "denizens", residents of our societies, but not fully included in rights and responsibilities of citizenship. To all of these animals we owe respect for their basic inviolable rights, but we inevitably and appropriately have very different relations with them, with different types of obligations. Humans and animals are inextricably bound in a complex web of relationships, and Zoopolis offers an original and profoundly affirmative vision of how to ground this complex web of relations on principles of justice and compassion.
Animal rights --- Human-animal relationships --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Animal-human relationships --- Animal-man relationships --- Animals and humans --- Human beings and animals --- Man-animal relationships --- Relationships, Human-animal --- Animals --- Animal liberation --- Animals' rights --- Rights of animals --- Animal welfare --- Human-animal relationships - Moral and ethical aspects
Choose an application
Choose an application
En matière de droit des animaux les théories classiques visent à protéger les animaux contre les violences qu'ils peuvent subir et érigent une barrière protectrice autour d'eux. Or, une telle approche ne donne aucun résultat pratique significatif. Raison pour laquelle Will Kymlicka et Sue Donaldson se focalisent non sur les droits des animaux mais sur nos obligations concrètes à leur égard. Ce qui suppose que l'on examine nos relations avec eux. Ils proposent trois catégories d'animaux : domestique, sauvages et liminaire. Et pour chacune, trois modèles de vivre ensemble : la citoyenneté, la souveraineté, le statut de résident. Pour ce faire, ils s'appuient sur des travaux concernant les personnes en situation de handicap et la manière dont on peut les sortir de l'invisibilité sociale et politique. Aujourd'hui les théories de la justice intègrent enfin la notion de vulnérabilité reléguant par là même l'idée de citoyens de seconde zone. Cette reconnaissance, à la fois morale et politique, d'individus vulnérables, les auteurs de Zoopolis suggèrent de l'appliquer aux animaux.
Animaux -- Droit --- Relations homme-animal --- Droit --- Animal rights. --- Human-animal relationships --- Animal welfare. --- Animaux --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Droits --- Aspect moral --- Protection --- Animal rights --- Droits. --- Aspect moral.
Choose an application
This book addresses the major theoretical and practical issues of the forms of citizenship and access to citizenship in different types of polity, and the specification and justification of rights of non-citizen immigrants as well as non-resident citizens. It also addresses the conditions under which norms governing citizenship can legitimately vary. The book discusses the principles of including all affected interests (AAI), all subject to coercion (ASC) and all citizenship stakeholders (ACS). They complement each other because they serve distinct purposes of democratic inclusion. The book proposes that democratic inclusion principles specify a relation between an individual or group that has an inclusion claim and a political community that aims to achieve democratic legitimacy for its political decisions and institutions. It contextualizes the principle of stakeholder inclusion, which provides the best answer to the question of democratic boundaries of membership, by applying it to polities of different types. The book distinguishes state, local and regional polities and argues that they differ in their membership character. It examines how a principle of stakeholder inclusion applies to polities of different types. The book illustrates the difference between consensual and automatic modes of inclusion by considering the contrast between birthright acquisition of citizenship, which is generally automatic, and naturalization, which requires an application.
Political participation. --- Representative government and representation. --- Democracy --- Social aspects. --- Bauböck, Rainer --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Self-government --- Political science --- Equality --- Representative government and representation --- Republics --- Parliamentary government --- Political representation --- Representation --- Constitutional history --- Constitutional law --- Elections --- Suffrage --- Citizen participation --- Community action --- Community involvement --- Community participation --- Involvement, Community --- Mass political behavior --- Participation, Citizen --- Participation, Community --- Participation, Political --- Political activity --- Political behavior --- Political rights --- Social participation --- Political activists --- Politics, Practical --- all affected interests --- all citizenship stakeholders --- all subject to coercion --- citizenship --- democratic inclusion --- local polities --- membership --- political community --- regional polities --- stakeholder inclusion --- state polities --- Society and social sciences. --- Political science and theory. --- PHILOSOPHY / Political. --- Law --- Jurisprudence & general issues --- Methods, theory & philosophy of law.
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|