Listing 1 - 10 of 25 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Although recent works on Galileo's trial have reached new heights of erudition, documentation, and sophistication, they often exhibit inflated complexities, neglect 400 years of historiography, or make little effort to learn from Galileo. This book strives to avoid such lacunae by judiciously comparing and contrasting the two Galileo affairs, that is, the original controversy over the earth's motion ending with his condemnation by the Inquisition in 1633, and the subsequent controversy over the rightness of that condemnation continuing to our day. The book argues that the Copernican Revolution required that the hypothesis of the earth's motion be not only constructively supported with new reasons and evidence, but also critically defended from numerous old and new objections. This defense in turn required not only the destructive refutation, but also the appreciative understanding of those objections in all their strength. A major Galilean accomplishment was to elaborate such a reasoned, critical, and fair-minded defense of Copernicanism. Galileo's trial can be interpreted as a series of ecclesiastic attempts to stop him from so defending Copernicus. And an essential thread of the subsequent controversy has been the emergence of many arguments claiming that his condemnation was right, as well as defenses of Galileo from such criticisms. The book's particular yet overarching thesis is that today the proper defense of Galileo can and should have the reasoned, critical, and fair-minded character which his own defense of Copernicus had.
Galilei, Galileo --- Copernicus, Nicolaus --- Religion and science --- Science --- Trials (Heresy) --- Heresy --- Normal science --- Philosophy of science --- History --- Philosophy --- Copernicus, Nicolaus, --- Galilei, Galileo, --- Galileo Galilei --- Galilée --- Copernic, Nicolas --- Kopernik, Mikołaj --- Influence. --- Trials, litigation, etc.
Choose an application
This is an interpretative and evaluative study of the thought of Antonio Gramsci, the founding father of the Italian Communist Party who died in 1937 after ten years of imprisonment in Fascist jails. It proceeds by a rigorous textual analysis of his Prison Notebooks, the scattered notes he wrote during his incarceration. Professor Finocchiaro explores the nature of Gramsci's dialectical thinking, in order to show in what ways Gramsci was and was not a Marxist, as well as to illustrate correspondences with the work of Hegel, Croce, and Bukharin. The book provides a critical reappraisal of Gramsci as a thinker and of the dialectical approach as a mode of inquiry.
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Gramsci, Antonio --- Gramsci, Antonio, --- 1 GRAMSCI, ANTONIO --- Filosofie. Psychologie--GRAMSCI, ANTONIO --- 1 GRAMSCI, ANTONIO Filosofie. Psychologie--GRAMSCI, ANTONIO --- Gramshi, Antonio, --- Gramši, Antonije, --- Gramshi, A. --- Gramši, Antonio, --- Gkramsi, Antonio, --- גרמשי, אנטוניו, --- Gramshi, Antonio --- Gramši, Antonije --- Gramši, Antonio --- Gkramsi, Antonio --- Arts and Humanities --- Philosophy --- Philosophy, Marxist. --- Criticism and interpretation.
Choose an application
Christian church history --- Galilei, Galileo --- Holy Office --- Inquisitie --- Inquisition --- Religion and science --- History
Choose an application
Logic --- Galilei, Galileo --- Logic, Modern --- Reasoning --- Science --- Astronomy --- Logique moderne --- Raisonnement --- Sciences --- Astronomie --- History --- Methodology --- Early works to 1800 --- Histoire --- Méthodologie --- Ouvrages avant 1800 --- Galilei, Galileo, --- Contributions in logic --- Solar system --- Système solaire --- -Logic, Modern --- -Reasoning --- -Solar system --- -Natural science --- Science of science --- Argumentation --- Ratiocination --- Reason --- Thought and thinking --- Judgment (Logic) --- Modern logic --- Physical sciences --- Space sciences --- -History --- -Logic --- Reasoning. --- History. --- -Early works to 1800 --- Méthodologie --- Système solaire --- Natural science --- Methodology&delete& --- Galileo Galilei --- Galilée --- Contributions in logic. --- Natural sciences --- Logic, Modern - History --- Science - Methodology - History --- Galilei, Galileo, - 1564-1642 --- Solar system - Early works to 1800
Choose an application
Science --- History --- Philosophy --- Philosophy. --- -Science --- -Natural science --- Science of science --- Sciences --- Philosophical Overview --- Hedonism --- Stoicism --- Overview, Philosophical --- Overviews, Philosophical --- Philosophical Overviews --- Philosophies --- history. --- History. --- -history. --- Normal science --- Philosophy of science --- Pharmacy Philosophy --- Pharmacy Philosophies --- Philosophies, Pharmacy --- Philosophy, Pharmacy --- history --- Science - History --- Science - Philosophy
Choose an application
Although recent works on Galileo’s trial have reached new heights of erudition, documentation, and sophistication, they often exhibit inflated complexities, neglect 400 years of historiography, or make little effort to learn from Galileo. This book strives to avoid such lacunae by judiciously comparing and contrasting the two Galileo affairs, that is, the original controversy over the earth’s motion ending with his condemnation by the Inquisition in 1633, and the subsequent controversy over the rightness of that condemnation continuing to our day. The book argues that the Copernican Revolution required that the hypothesis of the earth’s motion be not only constructively supported with new reasons and evidence, but also critically defended from numerous old and new objections. This defense in turn required not only the destructive refutation, but also the appreciative understanding of those objections in all their strength. A major Galilean accomplishment was to elaborate such a reasoned, critical, and fair-minded defense of Copernicanism. Galileo’s trial can be interpreted as a series of ecclesiastic attempts to stop him from so defending Copernicus. And an essential thread of the subsequent controversy has been the emergence of many arguments claiming that his condemnation was right, as well as defenses of Galileo from such criticisms. The book’s particular yet overarching thesis is that today the proper defense of Galileo can and should have the reasoned, critical, and fair-minded character which his own defense of Copernicus had.
Catholic Church -- Doctrines -- History -- 17th century. --- Catholic Church -- Italy -- History -- 17th century. --- Copernicus, Nicolaus, 1473-1543. --- Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642 -- Trials, litigation, etc. --- Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642. --- Inquisition -- Italy. --- Religion and science -- Italy -- History -- 17th century. --- Religion and science --- Science --- Trials (Heresy) --- Philosophy & Religion --- Astronomy & Astrophysics --- Physical Sciences & Mathematics --- Philosophy --- Sciences - General --- Astronomy - General --- History --- Genetic epistemology. --- Religion. --- History. --- Philosophy. --- Epistemology. --- Philosophy and science. --- Philosophy of Science. --- History of Science. --- Religious Studies, general. --- History of Philosophy. --- Religion, Primitive --- Atheism --- God --- Irreligion --- Religions --- Theology --- Normal science --- Philosophy of science --- Developmental psychology --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Galilei, Galileo, --- Copernicus, Nicolaus, --- Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642 --- Trials, litigation, etc. --- Influence. --- rättegångar, processer etc. --- influenser. --- Copernicus, Nicolaus --- Copernic, Nicolas --- Kopernik, Mikołaj --- Galileo Galilei --- Galilée
Choose an application
Inquisition. --- Religion and science --- History. --- Inquisition --- Religion et sciences --- History --- Histoire --- Galilei, Galileo, --- Holy Office --- Autos-da-fé --- History of controversy --- Galileo Galilei --- Galilée --- Galilei, Galileo
Choose an application
215 --- Religion and science --- -Science --- -Natural science --- Science of science --- Sciences --- Christianity and science --- Geology --- Geology and religion --- Science --- Science and religion --- Godsdienst en wetenschap --- History --- -Philosophy --- Religious aspects --- Galilei, Galileo, --- Galileo Galilei --- Galilée --- Trials, litigation, etc. --- Normal science --- Philosophy of science --- Philosophy --- Galilei, Galileo --- Italy --- 17th century
Choose an application
Following an approach that is empirical but not psychological, and dialectical but not dialogical, in this book Maurice Finocchiaro defines concepts such as reasoning, argument, argument analysis, critical reasoning, methodological reflection, judgment, critical thinking, and informal logic. Including extended critiques of the views of many contemporary scholars, he also integrates into the discussion Arnauld's Port-Royal Logic, Gramsci's theory of intellectuals, and case studies from the history of science, particularly the work of Galileo, Newton, Huygens, and Lavoisier.
Reasoning. --- Reasoning --- Argumentation --- Ratiocination --- Reason --- Thought and thinking --- Judgment (Logic) --- Logic
Choose an application
Système solaire. --- Astronomie. --- Astronomy. --- Galilei, Galileo --- Galilei, Galileo, --- Solar system.
Listing 1 - 10 of 25 | << page >> |
Sort by
|