Listing 1 - 10 of 23 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This book is about history and morality in the twentieth century. It is about the psychology which made possible Hiroshima, the Nazi genocide, the Gulag, the Chinese Cultural Revolution, Pol Pot's Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia and many other atrocities. In modern technological war, victims are distant and responsibility is fragmented. The scientists making the atomic bomb thought that they were only providing a weapon: how it was used was to be the responsibility of society. The people who dropped the bomb were only obeying orders. The machinery of the political decision-taking was so complex that no one among the politicians was unambiguously responsible. No one thought of themselves as causing the horrors of Hiroshima. Jonathan Glover examines tribalism: how, in Rwanda and in the former Yugoslavia, people who once lived together became trapped into mutual fear and hatred. He investigates how, in Stalin's Russia, Mao's China and in Cambodia, systems of belief made atrocities possible. The analysis of Nazism explores the emotionally powerful combination of tribalism and belief which enabled people to commit acts otherwise unimaginabl. Drawing on accounts of participants, victims and observers, Jonathan Glover shows that different atrocities have common patterns which suggest weak points in our psychology. The resulting picture is used as a guide for the ethics we should create if we hope to overcome them. The message is not one of pessimism or despair: only by looking closely at the monsters inside us can we undertake the project of caging and taming them.
World history --- anno 1900-1999 --- History, Modern --- Moral and ethical aspects --- 930.9 --- -#SBIB:17H10 --- #SBIB:93H3 --- 172 --- Modern history --- World history, Modern --- Wereldgeschiedenis --- Ethiek en moraalfilosofie: algemeen --- Thematische geschiedenis --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- 930.9 Wereldgeschiedenis --- #SBIB:17H10 --- History, Modern - 20th century - Moral and ethical aspects
Choose an application
Progress in genetic and reproductive technology now offers us the possibility of choosing what kinds of children we do and don't have. Should we welcome this power, or should we fear its implications? There is no ethical question more urgent than this: we may be at a turning-point in the history of humanity. The renowned moral philosopher and best-selling author Jonathan Glover shows us how we might try to answer this question, and other provoking and disturbing questions to which it leads. Surely parents owe it to their children to give them the best life they can? Increasingly we are able to reduce the number of babies born with disabilities and disorders. But there is a powerful new challenge to conventional thinking about the desirability of doing so: this comes from the voices of those who have these conditions. They call into question the very definition of disability. How do we justify trying to avoid bringing people like them into being? In 2002 a deaf couple used sperm donated by a friend with hereditary deafness to have a deaf baby: they took the view that deafness is not a disability, but a difference. Starting with the issues raised by this case, Jonathan Glover examines the emotive idea of 'eugenics', and the ethics of attempting to enhance people, for non-medical reasons, by means of genetic choices. Should parents be free, not only to have children free from disabilities, but to choose, for instance, the colour of their eyes or hair? This is no longer a distant prospect, but an existing power which we cannot wish away. What impact will such interventions have, both on the individuals concerned and on society as a whole? Should we try to make general improvements to the genetic make-up of human beings? Is there a central core of human nature with which we must not interfere? This beautifully clear book is written for anyone who cares about the rights and wrongs of parents' choices for their children, anyone who is concerned about our human future. Glover handles these uncomfortable questions in a controversial but always humane and sympathetic manner.
Biologie humaine -- Morale et aspects éthiques --- Biomedical ethics --- Biomedische ethiek --- Biomédecine -- Morale et aspects éthiques --- Children--Diseases--Genetic aspects --- Counseling genetique --- Deontologie [Medische ] --- Deontology [Medical ] --- Déontologie médicale --- Désordres génétiques chez les enfants --- Enfant [Désordres génétiques chez l' ] --- Enfants [Désordres génétiques chez les ] --- Ethics [Medical ] --- Ethiek [Medische ] --- Ethique médicale --- Genetic counseling --- Genetic disorders in children --- Genetische counseling --- Genetische stoornissen bij kinderen --- Kinderen [Genetische stoornissen bij ] --- Medical care -- Moral and ethical aspects --- Medical deontology --- Medical ethics --- Medicine -- Moral and ethical aspects --- Medische deontologie --- Medische ethiek --- Morale et médecine --- Morale médicale --- Médecine -- Innovations -- Morale et aspects éthiques --- Médecine -- Morale et aspects éthiques --- Médecine et morale --- Politique sanitaire -- Morale et aspects éthiques --- Soins médicaux -- Morale et aspects éthiques --- Stoornissen [Genetische ] bij kinderen --- Troubles génétiques chez les enfants --- Éthique clinique --- Abnormalities, Human --- Genetic counseling. --- Genetic disorders in children. --- Medical ethics. --- Reproductive Techniques --- Genetic Engineering --- Preimplantation Diagnosis --- Genetic aspects. --- ethics. --- Ethics. --- Professional ethics. Deontology --- Abnormalities [Human ] --- Genetic aspects
Choose an application
Responsibility --- Free will and determinism --- Mental illness --- Responsabilité --- Libre arbitre et déterminisme --- Maladies mentales --- 241.2*3 --- 17.021.25 --- Madness --- Mental diseases --- Mental disorders --- Disabilities --- Psychology, Pathological --- Mental health --- Compatibilism --- Determinism and free will --- Determinism and indeterminism --- Free agency --- Freedom and determinism --- Freedom of the will --- Indeterminism --- Liberty of the will --- Determinism (Philosophy) --- Accountability --- Moral responsibility --- Obligation --- Ethics --- Supererogation --- Theologische ethiek: vrijheid en verantwoordelijkheid --- Verantwoordelijkheid --- 17.021.25 Verantwoordelijkheid --- 241.2*3 Theologische ethiek: vrijheid en verantwoordelijkheid --- Responsabilité --- Libre arbitre et déterminisme --- Psychiatry --- General ethics --- Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Free will and determinism. --- Mental illness. --- Responsibility.
Choose an application
Psychology --- Psychologie --- Philosophy --- Philosophie --- -Behavioral sciences --- Mental philosophy --- Mind --- Science, Mental --- Human biology --- Soul --- Mental health --- -Philosophy --- -Metafysica van het geestesleven. Philosphy of mind. Artificial intelligence --- -130.3 Metafysica van het geestesleven. Philosphy of mind. Artificial intelligence --- Philosophical anthropology --- Theory of knowledge
Choose an application
Utilitarianism --- Ethics --- Hedonism --- Philosophy
Choose an application
The twentieth century was the most brutal in human history, featuring a litany of shameful events that includes the Holocaust, Hiroshima, the Stalinist era, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, and Rwanda. This book looks at the politics of our times and the roots of human nature to discover why so many atrocities were perpetuated and how we can create a social environment to prevent their recurrence. Jonathan Glover finds similarities in the psychology of those who perpetuate, collaborate in, and are complicit with atrocities, uncovering some disturbing common elements--tribal hatred, blind adherence to ideology, diminished personal responsibility--as well as characteristics unique to each situation. Acknowledging that human nature has a dark and destructive side, he proposes that we encourage the development of a political and personal moral imagination that will compel us to refrain from and protest all acts of cruelty.
History, Modern --- Ethics, Modern --- War --- Humanity --- Atrocities --- Moral and ethical aspects --- History --- Ethics --- Modern history --- World history, Modern --- World history --- Military atrocities --- Cruelty --- War crimes --- War and morals --- History, Modern - 21st century - Moral and ethical aspects --- Ethics, Modern - 21st century --- War - Moral and ethical aspects --- War - History - 20th century --- Humanity - History - 20th century --- Atrocities - History - 20th century
Choose an application
#GGSB: Bio-ethiek --- 241.63 --- 241.63 Theologische ethiek: eerbied voor het leven en de waardigheid van de menselijke persoon --- Theologische ethiek: eerbied voor het leven en de waardigheid van de menselijke persoon --- Life and death, Power over --- Death, Power over --- Power over life and death --- Ethics --- Free will and determinism --- Liberty --- Punishment --- #GBIB:CBMER --- General ethics --- Life and death, Power over. --- Bio-ethiek
Choose an application
We have made huge progress in understanding the biology of mental illnesses, but comparatively little in interpreting them at the psychological level. The eminent philosopher Jonathan Glover believes that there is real hope of progress in the human interpretation of disordered minds. The challenge is that the inner worlds of people with psychiatric disorders can seem strange, like alien landscapes, and this strangeness can deter attempts at understanding. Do people with disorders share enough psychology with other people to make interpretation possible? To explore this question, Glover tackles the hard cases-the inner worlds of hospitalized violent criminals, of people with delusions, and of those diagnosed with autism or schizophrenia. Their first-person accounts offer glimpses of inner worlds behind apparently bizarre psychiatric conditions and allow us to begin to learn the "language" used to express psychiatric disturbance. Art by psychiatric patients, or by such complex figures as van Gogh and William Blake, give insight when interpreted from Glover's unique perspective. He also draws on dark chapters in psychiatry's past to show the importance of not medicalizing behavior that merely transgresses social norms. And finally, Glover suggests values, especially those linked with agency and identity, to guide how the boundaries of psychiatry should be drawn. Seamlessly blending philosophy, science, literature, and art, Alien Landscapes? is both a sustained defense of humanistic psychological interpretation and a compelling example of the rich and generous approach to mental life for which it argues.
Psychiatry --- Mental illness --- Psychiatric diagnosis --- Psychodiagnostics --- Decision making. --- Diagnosis. --- Mental Disorders. --- Mentally Ill Persons. --- Mentally Ill --- Mental Patients --- Ill, Mentally --- Mentally Ill Person --- Person, Mentally Ill --- Persons, Mentally Ill --- Mental Disorders --- Commitment of Mentally Ill --- Behavior Disorders --- Diagnosis, Psychiatric --- Mental Disorders, Severe --- Psychiatric Diagnosis --- Mental Illness --- Psychiatric Diseases --- Psychiatric Disorders --- Psychiatric Illness --- Illness, Mental --- Mental Disorder --- Mental Disorder, Severe --- Mental Illnesses --- Psychiatric Disease --- Psychiatric Disorder --- Psychiatric Illnesses --- Severe Mental Disorder --- Severe Mental Disorders --- Mentally Ill Persons
Choose an application
History, Modern --- Modern history --- World history, Modern --- World history --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Histoire --- Aspect moral
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 23 | << page >> |
Sort by
|