Listing 1 - 10 of 44 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
The emperor Commodus (AD 180-192) has commonly been portrayed as an insane madman, whose reign marked the beginning of the end of the Roman Empire. Indeed, the main point of criticism on his father, Marcus Aurelius, is that he appointed his son as his successor. Especially Commodus' behaviour as a gladiator, and the way he represented himself with divine attributes (especially those of Hercules), are often used as evidence for the emperor's presumed madness. However, this 'political biography' will apply modern interpretations of the spectacles in the arena, and of the imperial cult, to Commodus' reign. It will focus on the dissemination and reception of imperial images, and suggest that there was a method in Commodus' madness.
Commodus, --- Rome --- History --- Histoire --- Commodus --- Emperors --- Theses --- 937.06 --- -Rulers --- Sovereigns --- Heads of state --- Kings and rulers --- Monarchy --- Geschiedenis van Rome: keizerrijk--(31 v.Chr.-476 n.Chr.; algemeen) --- Commodus Emperor of Rome --- -Theses --- -Geschiedenis van Rome: keizerrijk--(31 v.Chr.-476 n.Chr.; algemeen) --- 937.06 Geschiedenis van Rome: keizerrijk--(31 v.Chr.-476 n.Chr.; algemeen) --- Rim --- Roman Empire --- Roman Republic (510-30 B.C.) --- Romi (Empire) --- Commodus, Lucius Aelius Aurelius, --- Commodo, --- Biography --- Emperors - Rome - Biography --- Emperor --- Political aspects
Choose an application
"For centuries, Roman emperors ruled a vast empire. Yet, at least officially, the emperor did not exist. No one knew exactly what titles he possessed, how he could be portrayed, what exactly he had to do, or how the succession was organised. Everyone knew, however, that the emperor held ultimate power over the empire. There were also expectations about what he should do and be, although these varied throughout the empire and also evolved over time. How did these expectations develop and change? To what degree could an emperor deviate from prevailing norms? And what role did major developments in Roman society - such as the rise of Christianity or the choice of Constantinople as the new capital - play in the ways in which emperors could exercise their rule? This ambitious and engaging book describes the surprising stability of the Roman Empire over more than six centuries of history"--
Choose an application
For centuries, Roman emperors ruled a vast empire. Yet, at least officially, the emperor did not exist. No one knew exactly what titles he possessed, how he could be portrayed, what exactly he had to do, or how the succession was organised. Everyone knew, however, that the emperor held ultimate power over the empire. There were also expectations about what he should do and be, although these varied throughout the empire and also evolved over time. How did these expectations develop and change? To what degree could an emperor deviate from prevailing norms? And what role did major developments in Roman society - such as the rise of Christianity or the choice of Constantinople as the new capital - play in the ways in which emperors could exercise their rule? This ambitious and engaging book describes the surprising stability of the Roman Empire over more than six centuries of history.
Emperors --- Rome --- Politics and government --- HISTORY / Ancient / General
Choose an application
Roman history --- Roman emperors --- anno 1-499 --- anno 500-599
Choose an application
This volume focuses on the interface between tradition and the shifting configuration of power structures in the Roman Empire. By examining various time periods and locales, its contributions show the Empire as a world filed with a wide variety of cultural, political, social, and religious traditions. These traditions were constantly played upon in the processes of negotiation and (re)definition that made the empire into a superstructure whose coherence was embedded in its diversity.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Roman history --- Hadrian [Roman emperor] --- Emperors --- Hadrian, --- Adrian, --- Hadrianus, --- Adriano, --- Hadrien, --- אדריאנוס, --- Rome --- History --- Geschiedenis --- Romeinse Rijk --- Hadrianus (Romeins keizer) --- Hadrianus (Romeinse keizer) --- Geneeskunde --- Techniek (wetenschap) --- Atlas --- Museum
Choose an application
8-90-351-3027-2
History of civilization --- Roman history --- 923.4 --- geschiedenis --- Romeinse Rijk --- Begrafenisrituelen --- Boerderij --- Christendom --- Cicero --- Geschiedenis --- Gladiatoren --- Heidens --- Leger --- Rome --- Slaven --- Spelen --- Trajanus --- geschiedenis - het Romeinse rijk --- Geschiedbronnen --- Geschiedbron
Choose an application
Kings and rulers in art --- Kings and rulers in numismatics --- Propaganda --- Rois et souverains dans l'art --- Rois et souverains en numismatique --- Propagande --- History --- Congresses. --- Histoire --- Congrès --- Mediterranean Region --- Méditerranée, Région de la --- Kings and rulers --- Rois et souverains --- Congrès --- Méditerranée, Région de la --- Communication in politics --- Political psychology --- Social influence --- Advertising --- Persuasion (Psychology) --- Psychological warfare --- Public relations --- Publicity --- Social pressure --- Numismatics --- Kings in art --- Circum-Mediterranean countries --- Mediterranean Area --- Mediterranean countries --- Mediterranean Sea Region
Choose an application
"Ancestry played a continuous role in the construction and portrayal of Roman emperorship in the first three centuries AD. Emperors and Ancestors is the first systematic analysis of the different ways in which imperial lineage was represented in the various 'media' through which images of emperors could be transmitted. Looking beyond individual rulers, Hekster evaluates evidence over an extended period of time and differentiates between various types of sources, such as inscriptions, sculpture, architecture, literary text, and particularly central coinage, which forms the most convenient source material for a modern reconstruction of Roman representations over a prolonged period of time. The volume explores how the different media in use sent out different messages. The importance of local notions and traditions in the choice of local representations of imperial ancestry are emphasized, revealing that there was no monopoly on image-forming by the Roman centre and far less interaction between central and local imagery than is commonly held. Imperial ancestry is defined through various parallel developments at Rome and in the provinces. Some messages resonated outside the centre but only when they were made explicit and fitted local practice and the discourse of the medium. The construction of imperial ancestry was constrained by the local expectations of how a ruler should present himself, and standardization over time of the images and languages that could be employed in the 'media' at imperial disposal. Roman emperorship is therefore shown to be a constant process of construction within genres of communication, representation, and public symbolism." -- Publisher's description
Emperors --- Art and state --- Heredity --- Emperors in art. --- Empereurs --- Art --- Hérédité --- Empereurs dans l'art --- Portraits. --- Iconography. --- Portraits --- Iconographie --- Politique gouvernementale --- Rome --- History --- Histoire --- Coinage --- Ancestry --- Descent --- Inheritance (Biology) --- Pangenesis --- Arts --- Politics and art --- State and art --- Rulers --- Sovereigns --- History. --- Government policy --- Emperors in art --- Hérédité --- Biology --- Breeding --- Atavism --- Eugenics --- Genetics --- Mendel's law --- Natural selection --- Art and society --- Cultural policy --- Education and state --- Czars (Emperors) --- Tsars --- Tzars --- Kings and rulers --- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
Listing 1 - 10 of 44 | << page >> |
Sort by
|