Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu).
Law. --- Law --- Constitutional law. --- Constitutional Law. --- Legal History. --- Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. --- History. --- Philosophy. --- Law-History. --- Constitutional law --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- Interpretation and construction --- Law—History. --- Law—Philosophy. --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- constitutional law --- Poland --- Sovereignty --- Westphalian sovereignty --- Legal history --- History and criticism
Choose an application
This second volume of ReConFort, published open access, addresses the decisive role of constitutional normativity, and focuses on discourses concerning the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of power, judiciary as constituted power). In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, constitutional normativity began to complete the legal fixation of the entire political order. This juridification in one constitutional text resulted in a conceptual differentiation from ordinary law, which extends to alterability and justiciability. The early expressions of this ‘new order of the ages’ suggest an unprecedented and irremediable break with European legal tradition, be it with British colonial governance or the French ancien régime. In fact, while the shift to constitutions as a hierarchically ‘higher’ form of positive law was a revolutionary change, it also drew upon old liberties. The American constitutional discourse, which was itself heavily influenced by British common law, in turn served as an inspiration for a variety of constitutional experiments – from the French Revolution to Napoleon’s downfall, in the halls of the Frankfurt Assembly, on the road to a unified Italy, and in the later theoretical discourse of twentieth-century Austria. If the constitution states the legal rules for the law-making process, then its Kelsian primacy is mandatory. Also included in this volume are the French originals and English translations of two vital documents. The first – Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès’ Du Jury Constitutionnaire (1795) – highlights an early attempt to reconcile the democratic values of the French Revolution with the pragmatic need to legally protect the Revolution. The second – the 1812 draft of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland – presents the ‘constitutional propaganda’ of the Russian Tsar Alexander I to bargain for the support of the Lithuanian and Polish nobility. These documents open new avenues of research into Europe’s constitutional history: one replete with diverse contexts and national experiences, but above all an overarching motif of constitutional decisiveness that served to complete the juridification of sovereignty. (www.reconfort.eu).
Law. --- Law --- Constitutional law. --- Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. --- Legal History. --- Constitutional Law. --- History. --- Philosophy. --- Constitutional law --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- Jurisprudence --- Legal history --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Legislation --- Interpretation and construction --- History and criticism --- Law-History. --- Law—Philosophy. --- Law—History. --- Droit --- Droit constitutionnel. --- Règle de droit --- Histoire --- Histoire. --- Philosophie. --- Precedence of Constitution --- Normativity and Constitution --- Constitutional History of Europe --- Constitutionality of Revolutions --- American Constitutional History --- Constitutional Normativity --- Fundamental Laws --- Old Liberties in European History --- Unconstitutionality of Statutes --- Judicial Review --- Normativity and Precedence --- Constitutional Precedence of the 3 May System --- Constitutional Precedence and Polish Substantial Criminal Law --- 1815 Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland --- Belgian Constitution of 1831 --- 1815 Constitution of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands --- Constituent Power and Constitutionalism in 19th Century Norway --- Spirit of the Albertine Statute --- Hans Kelsen and Adolf Julius Merkl
Choose an application
BPB1612 --- Droit constitutionnel --- Contrôle de constitutionnalité --- Procédure parlementaire --- Grondwettelijk recht --- Toezicht op de grondwettigheid --- Parlementaire procedure --- parlamentarisches Verfahren --- procedură parlamentară --- parlementaire procedure --- procedura parlamentare --- парламентарни поступак --- parlamentný postup --- parlamentarisk procedure --- parlamenta procedūra --- procedimiento parlamentario --- parlamentsförfarande --- menettely parlamentissa --- parlamentní proces --- parlamento darbo tvarka --- parlamentarni postopek --- парламентарна процедура --- parliamentary procedure --- procedura parlamentarna --- κοινοβουλευτική διαδικασία --- parlamentarni postupak --- processo parlamentar --- procedurë parlamentare --- parlamendimenetlus --- parlamenti eljárás --- парламентарна постапка --- proċedura parlamentari --- parlamentní procedury --- examen parlamentario --- parlamentaarne analüüs --- parlamentsbehandling --- esame parlamentare --- examen parlementaire --- parlamentsundersøgelse --- exame parlamentar --- parlamentaarinen tarkastelu --- parlamentné skrutínium --- parlamentarna procedura --- κοινοβουλευτική εξέταση --- parlamentinė analitinė priežiūra --- verifica di costituzionalità --- kontroll av författningsenlighet --- controlo de constitucionalidade --- control of constitutionality --- контрола уставности --- контрол на конституционост --- kontroll tal-kostituzzjonalità --- konstitucingumo kontrolė --- toezicht op de grondwettigheid --- põhiseaduslikkuse kontroll --- kontrola ustavnosti --- kontroll i kushtetutshmërisë --- control de constitucionalidad --- alkotmányosság vizsgálata --- kontrola konstytucyjności --- presoja ustavnosti --- kontrola ústavnosti --- Kontrolle der Verfassungsmäßigkeit --- kontrol af overensstemmelse med forfatningen --- контрола на уставноста --- έλεγχος συνταγματικότητας --- control constituțional --- perustuslaillisuuden valvonta --- konstitucionālisma kontrole --- alkotmányossági normakontroll --- jogszabályok alkotmányossága --- ústavnost zákonů --- ústavnosť zákonov --- kushtetutshmëri e ligjeve --- ústavnost právního předpisu --- loves forfatningsmæssighed --- контрола на уставноста на општите акти --- ustavnost zakona --- konstitucionālā uzraudzība --- törvények alkotmányossága --- уставност на закон --- контрола на законитоста на управните акти --- constitucionalidad de las leyes --- előzetes normakontroll --- ústavní kontrola --- constituționalitatea legilor --- constitutionnalité des lois --- costituzionalità delle leggi --- συνταγματικότητα των νόμων --- grundlagsenlighet --- utólagos normakontroll --- grondwettigheid van de wet --- lakien perustuslainmukaisuus --- законитост на подзаконските акти --- įstatymų atitiktis konstitucijai --- tiesību aktu atbilstība konstitūcijai --- ústavní stížnost --- constitucionalidade das leis --- constitutionality of laws --- Verfassungsmäßigkeit der Gesetze --- seaduste põhiseaduslikkus --- control al constituţionalităţii --- e drejta kushtetuese --- drept constituțional --- riigiõigus --- Derecho constitucional --- constitutional law --- prawo konstytucyjne --- alkotmányjog --- valtiosääntöoikeus --- konstitucinė teisė --- уставно право --- forfatningsret --- direito constitucional --- författningsrätt --- konstitucionālais likums --- ústavné právo --- ustavno pravo --- ústavní právo --- конституционно право --- Verfassungsrecht --- συνταγματικό δίκαιο --- grondwettelijk recht --- diritto costituzionale --- dritt kostituzzjonali --- ligj parlamentar --- konstitucionalistika --- parlamentinė teisė --- staatsrecht --- konstitutionel ret --- parlamentārās tiesības --- politiek recht --- derecho político --- direito parlamentar --- Derecho parlamentario --- κοινοβουλευτικό δίκαιο --- parlamenti jog --- diritto parlamentare --- droit parlementaire --- parlementair recht --- parlamentní právo --- πολιτικό δικαίωμα --- politikai jog --- konstitucionālās tiesības --- parlamentarisk ret --- конституционално право --- prawo parlamentarne --- droit politique --- liġi parlamentari --- konstitutionell rätt --- oikeuspolitiikka --- parlamentné právo --- direito político --- parliamentary law --- valsts tiesības --- парламентарно право --- parlamentaarne õigus --- parlamentarno pravo --- Parlamentsrecht --- drept parlamentar --- státní právo --- statsforfatningsret --- diritto politico --- politisches Recht --- parlamentaarinen oikeus --- nós imeachta parlaiminteach --- dlí bunreachtúil --- rialú na bunreachtúlachta --- Procédure parlementaire --- Contrôle de constitutionnalité
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be ‘believed’ by the subjects and the political élites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the ‘religious’ affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as ‘creeds’ of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents’ big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the ‘renaissance’ of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cádiz Constitution 1812). Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu).
Legal theory and methods. Philosophy of law --- Public law. Constitutional law --- Law --- History --- filosofie --- geschiedenis --- recht --- grondrechten --- staatsrecht --- grondwet
Choose an application
This historically comparative search for evidence reverses the standard statements of Art. 101 subsection 1 sentence 2 of the German Basic Law ("GG"): Lawful judges without a state governed by the rule of law? The objective of the arguments is to prove that the idea of the lawful judge initially developed in Europe independently of the modern idea of a state governed by the rule of law. The evidence is shown by means of a historical comparison of the binding of the court organization to the law in England, France and Germany.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|