Listing 1 - 10 of 21 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
What are the processes that enable archives to become productive? Conventional archives tend to be defined through the content-specific accumulation of material, which conforms to an existing order or narrative. They rarely transform their structure. In contrast to this model of archival practice and preservation, the conflictual archive has an open framework in which it actively transforms itself, allowing for the creation of new and surprising relationships. Illustrating how spaces of knowledge can be devised, developed, and designed, this archive reveals itself as a space in which documents and testimonies open up a stage for productive dispute and struggle.
Archivistics --- Archives --- Documents --- Manuscript depositories --- Manuscript repositories --- Manuscripts --- Documentation --- History --- Information services --- Records --- Cartularies --- Charters --- Diplomatics --- Public records --- Depositories --- Repositories --- Muséologie --- Obrist, Hans Ulrich
Choose an application
At the heart of this book is a simple and profound proposition: to 'do' architecture is to immerse oneself in a conflictual process of material production--participation is not a productive encounter of multiple practitioners and stakeholders, but a set of conflicts, negotiations, maneuvers, and swindles between and within a multiplicity of agents, human and nonhuman alike--equally including architects, clients, financiers, and builders, say, but also silicon, plastic, concrete, each with its conflicting aims and different material means to achieve them. Every building is thus the materialization of such encounter. So, despite the hubris of the field, none of the parties to such an encounter can ultimately control that the result architecture (unlike real estate), according to Miessen, belongs to no one but affects and is affected by everyone--and this proposition asks that we reframe questions of ethics and politics. They can no longer be the property of an individual but a collective set of interrelations--it is through such profound departure from the terms of architecture that Miessen's new book demands nothing less than to reimagine how we might finally become citizens.
Architectural practice --- Architecture --- 72.07 --- Architect and client --- Architectural services --- Vocational guidance --- Architecten. Stedenbouwkundigen A - Z --- Practice --- 72.01 --- Cultuurfilosofie ; mediacultuur --- Architectuurtheorie ; participatie en verantwoordelijkheid --- Architectuur ; 21ste eeuw ; M. Miessen ; nOffice --- Miessen, Markus °1978 (°Bonn, Duitsland) --- Studio Miessen --- Architectuur ; theorie, filosofie, esthetica --- Théorie de l'architecture --- Architecture - Vocational guidance
Choose an application
Welcome to Harmonistan! Over the last decade, the term “participation” has become increasingly overused. When everyone has been turned into a participant, the often uncritical, innocent, and romantic use of the term has become frightening. Supported by a repeatedly nostalgic veneer of worthiness, phony solidarity, and political correctness, participation has become the default of politicians withdrawing from responsibility. Similar to the notion of an independent politician dissociated from a specific party, this third part of Miessen’s “Participation” trilogy encourages the role of what he calls the “crossbench practitioner,” an “uninterested outsider” and “uncalled participator” who is not limited by existing protocols, and who enters the arena with nothing but creative intellect and the will to generate change.Miessen argues for an urgent inversion of participation, a model beyond modes of consensus. Instead of reading participation as the charitable savior of political struggle, Miessen candidly reflects on the limits and traps of its real motivations. Rather than breading the next generation of consensual facilitators and mediators, he argues for conflict as an enabling, instead of disabling, force. The book calls for a format of conflictual participation—no longer a process by which others are invited “in,” but a means of acting without mandate, as uninvited irritant: a forced entry into fields of knowledge that arguably benefit from exterior thinking. Sometimes, democracy has to be avoided at all costs.
Choose an application
Public spaces --- Land use, Urban --- City planning --- Espaces publics --- Utilisation urbaine du sol --- Urbanisme --- 711.4 <43 BERLIN> --- 711.4 --- 711.61 --- 711.6 --- Berlin --- Berlijn --- Duitsland --- Gemeentelijke planologie. Stadsplanning. Stedenbouw--Duitsland voor 1945 en na 1989--BERLIN --- Stedenbouw --- Open ruimte --- Pleinen --- Stedelijke verkaveling --- Publieke ruimte --- 711.4 <43 BERLIN> Gemeentelijke planologie. Stadsplanning. Stedenbouw--Duitsland voor 1945 en na 1989--BERLIN --- Environmental planning --- Architecture
Choose an application
City planning. --- Regional planning. --- Space (Architecture) --- Urbanisme --- Aménagement du territoire --- Espace (Architecture) --- 711.4 --- 711 --- 72.017 --- Architecture and space --- Space and architectural mass --- Space in architecture --- Architecture --- City planning --- Regional development --- Regional planning --- State planning --- Human settlements --- Land use --- Planning --- Landscape protection --- Cities and towns --- Civic planning --- Land use, Urban --- Model cities --- Redevelopment, Urban --- Slum clearance --- Town planning --- Urban design --- Urban development --- Urban planning --- Art, Municipal --- Civic improvement --- Urban policy --- Urban renewal --- Stedenbouw --- Ruimtelijke ordening --- Ruimte (architectuur) --- Composition, proportion, etc. --- Government policy --- Management --- Aménagement du territoire --- Negative space (Architecture)
Choose an application
How has Berlin's urban landscape changed in its remarkable transformation from divided city to creative capital? Despite the monumental heritage and grand development projects, Berlin still conjures up images of urban fragmentation and vacant inner-city land. The book reveals the changing nature and complex politics of this open space. A rephotographing of sites between 2001 and 2016 shows how no man's land has made way for new apartments and underground hangouts have changed into commercial hubs, but it also transports us to remaining pockets of urban wilderness and unexpected freedom right next to the city's most iconic squares. The accompanying essays by noted urban thinkers explore this little-known but vital reserve-forcing us to reflect on our unrelenting efforts to chart the future of the city at large. Wie hat sich die Berliner Stadtlandschaft im Laufe der Verwandlung von einer geteilten Stadt zur Kreativmetropole verändert? Trotz des gewaltigen Erbes und großer Entwicklungsprojekte ruft Berlin immer noch Bilder von Lücken und innerstädtischer Brachen hervor. Das Buch macht die leicht veränderlichen und komplexen politischen Zusammenhänge dieser unbestimmten Orte deutlich. Fotografien von Orten aus den Jahren 2001 und 2016 zeigen, wie aus Niemandsland neue Wohnbauten und wie aus Untergrundtreffpunkten Geschäftszentren geworden sind. Sie zeigen aber auch verbliebene Nischen unerwarteter Wildnis und Freiheit. Die begleitenden Texte renommierter Urbanisten untersuchen diese wichtigen und oft stillen Reserven und fordern dazu auf unseren Einsatz für die Zukunft der Stadt zu hinterfragen.
Utopias --- City and town life --- Community development, Urban --- Public spaces --- Land use, Urban --- Open spaces --- Utopies --- Vie urbaine --- Développement communautaire urbain --- Espaces publics --- Utilisation urbaine du sol --- Espaces verts --- History --- Histoire --- 711.4(C)(430) --- Stedelijke ontwikkelingen; Duitsland; Berlijn; 2000-2018 --- Stadsvernieuwing --- Stedelijke open ruimten --- Stadsfotografie --- Stedenbouw. Ruimtelijke ordening ; vormgeving en analyse van de stad ; Duitsland --- urban landscapes --- Environmental planning --- architecture [object genre] --- Architecture --- Berlin --- City planning --- Repeat photography --- ARCHITECTURE / Urban & Land Use Planning. --- ARCHITECTURE / Study & Teaching. --- Rephotography --- Photography --- Urban land use --- Cities and towns --- Urban economics --- Urban policy --- Urban renewal --- Public places --- Social areas --- Urban public spaces --- Urban spaces --- Berlin (Germany) --- Buildings, structures, etc.
Choose an application
In September 2011, Nikolaus Hirsch and Markus Miessen invited protagonists from the fields of architecture, art, philosophy, and literature to reflect on the single question of what, today, can be understood as a critical modality of spatial practice. Most of the sixty-four contributions presented in this volume were composed concurrently with the evictions of many of the Occupy movements, sustained turmoil in countries of the Arab Spring, and continued spasms in the global financial system, which, interestingly, all pointed at the question and problematic of whether architecture and our physical environment can still be understood as a res publica. A response by the editors takes the form of a conversation.This book is first in a series on critical spatial practice developed alongside the Städelschule program of the same name. Each edition includes work by invited artists—the first includes newly commissioned work by the photographer Armin Linke, who documented the Occupy camp around the European Central Bank in Frankfurt.
Space (Architecture) --- City planning. --- Architecture and society. --- Art and society. --- Espace (Architecture) --- Urbanisme --- Architecture et société --- Art et société --- 72.01 --- Architectuur (theorie) --- Architectuurtheorie --- Architectuur (kritiek) --- Architectuurkritiek
Choose an application
Health facilities --- Health facilities --- Public art spaces --- Art and society --- Art and society --- Art --- Équipements sanitaires --- Equipements sanitaires --- Espaces d'art public --- Art et société --- Art et société --- Art --- Decoration --- Congresses --- Design and construction --- Congresses --- Social aspects --- Congresses --- Congresses --- Political aspects --- Décoration --- Congrès --- Conception et construction --- Congrès --- Aspect social --- Congrès --- Congrès --- Aspect politique
Choose an application
Schreiber, Constanze ; Zapata Zuluaga, Felipe ; Choi, Goeun ; Soriano, Iliana ; Holowko, Kathy ; Országhová, Kristina ; KT Rangnick ; Angelovska, Marija ; Hassanain, Ola ; Hukku, Pooja ; Gregoriou, Stavroula ; Holtrop, Willem
Choose an application
Unbuilding is the other half of building. Buildings, treated as currency, rapidly inflate and deflate in volatile financial markets. Cities expand and shrink; whether through the violence of planning utopias or war, they are also targets of urbicide. Repeatable spatial products quickly make new construction obsolete; the powerful bulldoze the disenfranchised; buildings can radiate negative real estate values and cause their surroundings to topple to the ground. Demolition has even become a spectacular entertainment. Keller Easterling's volume in the 'Critical Spatial Practice' series analyzes the urgency of building subtraction. Often treated as failure or loss, subtraction - when accepted as part of an exchange - can be growth. All over the world, sprawl and overdevelopment have attracted distended or failed markets and exhausted special landscapes. However, in failure, buildings can create their own alternative markets of durable spatial variables that can be managed and traded by citizens and cities rather than the global financial industry.
Environmental planning --- comprehensive plans [reports] --- ruimtelijke ordening --- 72.01 --- Architectuur (theorie) --- Architectuurtheorie --- Architectuur (kritiek) --- Architectuurkritiek --- Architecture and society. --- City planning. --- Space (Architecture).
Listing 1 - 10 of 21 | << page >> |
Sort by
|