Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Emigration and immigration law --- Aliens --- Asylum, Right of --- Emigration et immigration --- Etrangers --- Droit d'asile --- Social aspects. --- Social conditions --- Government policy. --- Droit --- Aspect social --- Conditions sociales --- Politique gouvernementale --- 314.7 --- Emigration and immigration --- Immigrants --- Immigration law --- Law, Emigration --- Law, Immigration --- International travel regulations --- Right of asylum --- Sanctuary (Law) --- Refugees --- Defection --- Deportation --- Extradition --- Enemy aliens --- Expatriates --- Foreign citizens (Aliens) --- Foreign population --- Foreign residents --- Foreigners --- Noncitizens --- Resident aliens --- Unnaturalized foreign residents --- Persons --- Deportees --- Exiles --- 314.7 Migratie. Geografische mobiliteit. Verhuizingen--(demografie) --- Migratie. Geografische mobiliteit. Verhuizingen--(demografie) --- Government policy --- Social aspects --- Law and legislation --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Social conditions. --- Illegal aliens --- Illegal immigrants --- Non-citizens --- Unauthorized immigrants --- Undocumented aliens --- Undocumented immigrants
Choose an application
Choose an application
In Public Pensions, Susan M. Sterett traces the legal and constitutional structures underlying early social welfare programs in the United States. Sterett explains the status of state and local government payments for public servants and the poor from the mid-nineteenth century until the Great Depression. The most visible public payments for service in the United States were directed to soldiers, who risked death for the nation. However, firemen, not soldiers, first captured local governments- attention; social welfare programs for soldiers were modeled on firemen's pensions. The dangerous work of firefighting and of combat provided the fundamental legal analogy for courts as governments expanded pensions in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Nothing about the state court doctrine approving payments for dangerous, local service would allow pensions for indigent mothers and for the elderly, which states began to consider after 1910. Counties and railroads that objected to the new taxes could fight programs based on the old doctrine, established for firefighters, soldiers, and finally civil servants. State litigation provided one of the many grounds for contesting expanded welfare states in the early twentieth-century United States. Sterett demonstrates that state courts maintained a gendered division between the service that marked citizenship and the dependence that marked indigence, even during the promising ferment of the early twentieth century.
Local officials and employees --- State governments --- Civil service --- Local government --- Public officers --- Subnational governments --- Pensions --- History. --- Officials and employees
Choose an application
"As officials scrambled in 2020 to manage the spread of COVID, the reverberations of the crisis reached well beyond immediate public health concerns. The governance problems that emerged in the pandemic would be problems in other climate-related disasters too. Many of these governance problems wound up in court. Businesses filed claims with their insurance for lost commerce; when they were denied, some sued. Defense attorneys tried to get people released from prison, where people lived in dangerous conditions. As state governments ordered closures and otherwise tried to adapt, interest organizations that had long sought to limit government authority challenged them in court. Political officials railed against litigation they argued would stop businesses from reopening. The United States, like other countries, governs partly through litigation, and litigation is one way of seeing the multiple governance failures during the pandemic. Drawing on databases of cases filed, news reports, and the websites of advocacy groups and law firms, Susan Sterett argues that governing during the pandemic, or in any disaster, must include the human institutions intertwined with the virus. Those institutions reveal problems well beyond the reach of technical expertise. Failures in private insurance as a way of governing risk, conflicts about the primacy of religion, government authority, and health, are problems that predated the pandemic and will persist in future disasters"--
COVID-19 (Disease) --- COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020 --- -Social aspects. --- Social aspects. --- 2020. --- COVID. --- Pandemic. --- SARS COV-2. --- civil rights. --- climate change. --- climate covid and expertise. --- closures due to COVID. --- conservative legal movements. --- courts. --- disaster cascade. --- disaster studies. --- experts expertise. --- face masks. --- free exercise of religion. --- governance. --- government authority. --- government officials. --- insurance. --- liability. --- mandates. --- mass incarceration. --- pandemic politics. --- politics of courts. --- private insurance. --- public health. --- rule of law.
Choose an application
Listing 1 - 5 of 5 |
Sort by
|