Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Agriculture has made major contributions to China's economic growth and poverty reduction, but the literature has rarely focused on the institutional factors that might underpin such structural transformation and productivity. This paper aims to fill that gap. Drawing on an 8-year panel of 1,200 households in six key provinces, it explores the impact of government land reallocations and formal land-use certificates on agricultural productivity growth, as well as the likelihood of households to exit from agriculture or send family members to the non-farm sector. It finds that land tenure insecurity, measured by the history of past land reallocations, discourages households from quitting agriculture. The recognition of land rights through formal certificates encourages the temporary migration of rural labor. Both factors have a large impact on productivity (at about 30 percent each), mainly by encouraging market-based land transfers. A sustained increase in non-agricultural opportunities will likely reinforce the importance of secure land tenure, which is a precondition for successful structural transformation and continued economic attractiveness of rural areas.

Agricultural productivity --- Agriculture --- Allocative efficiency --- Economic Growth --- Economic Theory & Research --- Labor Policies --- Non-agricultural development --- Rural Development --- Rural Development Knowledge & Information Systems --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Structural change --- China

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Agriculture has made major contributions to China's economic growth and poverty reduction, but the literature has rarely focused on the institutional factors that might underpin such structural transformation and productivity. This paper aims to fill that gap. Drawing on an 8-year panel of 1,200 households in six key provinces, it explores the impact of government land reallocations and formal land-use certificates on agricultural productivity growth, as well as the likelihood of households to exit from agriculture or send family members to the non-farm sector. It finds that land tenure insecurity, measured by the history of past land reallocations, discourages households from quitting agriculture. The recognition of land rights through formal certificates encourages the temporary migration of rural labor. Both factors have a large impact on productivity (at about 30 percent each), mainly by encouraging market-based land transfers. A sustained increase in non-agricultural opportunities will likely reinforce the importance of secure land tenure, which is a precondition for successful structural transformation and continued economic attractiveness of rural areas.

Agricultural productivity --- Agriculture --- Allocative efficiency --- Economic Growth --- Economic Theory & Research --- Labor Policies --- Non-agricultural development --- Rural Development --- Rural Development Knowledge & Information Systems --- Rural Poverty Reduction --- Structural change --- China

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper presents new data on the micro structure of the export sector for 45 countries and studies how exporter behavior varies with country size and stage of development. Larger countries and more developed countries have more exporters, larger exporters, and a greater share of exports controlled by the top 5 percent. The extensive margin (more firms) plays a greater role than the intensive margin (average size) in supporting exports of larger countries. In contrast, the intensive margin is relatively more important in explaining the exports of richer countries. Exporter entry and exit rates are higher and entrant survival is lower at an early stage of development. The paper discusses the results in light of trade theories with heterogeneous firms and the empirical literature on resource allocation, firm size, and development. An implication from the findings is that developing countries export less because the top of the firm-size distribution is truncated.

Allocative efficiency --- Country strategy & performance --- Currencies and exchange rates --- Debt markets --- Economic theory & research --- Exporter dynamics --- Exporter growth --- Finance and financial sector development --- Firm-level data --- Free trade --- International economics & trade --- Macroeconomics and economic growth

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In the last two decades more than 120 countries have adopted a version of a Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF). These are budget institutions whose rationale it is to enable the central government to make credible multi-year fiscal commitments. This paper analyzes a newly-collected dataset of worldwide MTEF adoptions during 1990-2008. It exploits within-country variation in MTEF adoption in a dynamic panel framework to estimate their impacts. The analysis finds that MTEFs strongly improve fiscal discipline, with more advanced MTEF phases having a larger impact. Higher-phase MTEFs also improve allocative efficiency. Only top-phase MTEFs have a significantly positive effect on technical efficiency.

Allocative efficiency --- Banks & Banking Reform --- Budget institutions --- Debt Markets --- Dynamic panel data analysis --- E-Business --- Fiscal discipline --- Health Monitoring & Evaluation --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- MTEF --- Poverty Reduction --- Public Sector Development --- Public Sector Expenditure Policy --- Technical efficiency

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper documents the sources of the Republic of Korea's economic growth, as well as the associated productivity growth and efficiency dynamics during its process of structural transformation from 1970 to 2016. The analysis includes land as a separate production factor to sort out the significant effect of changes in intersectoral land allocation, which makes significant differences in measuring the magnitudes and directions of change in sectoral total factor productivity (TFP). Input-based growth and structural changes contributed to the early take-off stage of growth in the 1970s. However, in the following three decades, the source of growth switched to productivity improvements, mainly engineered by the industry sector. This was the reason behind the country's sustained growth and escape from the "middle-income trap." Furthermore, agricultural TFP growth also made an important contribution to structural transformation by pushing out factors from agriculture to industry. Since 2011, however, when the Korean economy seemed to reach a steady state of constant capital-output ratio, TFP has suddenly stagnated. The wedge analysis suggests that the intersectoral allocation of labor was biased toward agriculture while that of capital and land was biased toward industry, compared to efficient levels. Meanwhile, the inter-temporal wedge analysis suggests that the Korean economy was in an over-investment mode throughout its structural transformation. The analysis also shows that the periods of productivity growth are not always associated with the enhancement of allocative efficiency, while growth-disturbing external macroeconomic shocks, such as joining the WTO and the Asian financial crisis, led to improvements in allocative efficiency.

Allocative Efficiency --- Economic Growth --- Economic Theory and Research --- Labor Markets --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Marginal Rate of Substitution --- Productivity Growth --- Social Protections and Labor --- Structural Transformation --- Sustainable Development --- Total Factor Productivity --- Wedge Analysis