Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Auf Betreiben des byzantinischen Kaisers Justinian I. wurde Origenes von Alexandria (185 - 253 / 54) im Umfeld des Ökumenischen Konzils von Konstantinopel 553 als Häretiker verurteilt. Diese Verketzerung hatte weitreichende Folgen für die weitere Rezeption seiner Werke und seiner Theologie sowie für das Bild, das künftige Generationen sich von ihm machten. Die Beiträge des vorliegenden Bandes analysieren die kirchenpolitischen, monastischen und theologischen Hintergründe dieser Debatten über Origenes und die ihm zugeschriebenen Lehren auf der Basis der dafür vorhandenen Quellen. Diese werden in einem Anhang mit (meist ersten) deutschen Übersetzungen und ausführlichen Kommentierungen als Arbeitshilfen für die weitere Forschung dieser Vorgänge vorgelegt.
Choose an application
Quinisext Synod --- 262.5*16 --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Quinisext Synod, Constantinople, 692 --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Concilio Trullano --- Concilium Quinisextum --- Council in Trullo --- Synod in Trullo --- Trullan Synod --- Concilium Trullanum --- Quinisext Synod (691 : Constantinople) --- Byzantine Empire --- Church history --- Sources --- Ecclesiastical geography --- HISTORY / General.
Choose an application
Ester Brunet riesamina la recezione del concilio Quinisesto nelle fonti occidentali dei secoli VII e IX, vale a dire all’interno di un periodo cronologico compreso tra il momento della sua convocazione e il patriarcato di Fozio, ed entro i confini geografico-politici dell’Italia bizantina e dei regni franco e longobardo, poi inclusi nell’Impero carolingio e nei suoi successivi frazionamenti. Studiare la recezione di quella sinodo comporta in primo luogo sia l’analisi dei modi e delle circostanze storiche in cui esso ha incominciato a circolare nell’ortodossia romana, diffondendosi e acquisendo «autorità» a Roma e Oltralpe, sia, per contro, dei motivi del suo rigetto. Questo lavoro si apre con l’esame dello status quaestionis relativo agli scritti sul Quinisesto, e in particolare sul suo statuto ecumenico. Di seguito, Ester Brunet si preoccupa di individuare il proprium concettuale della «recezione» conciliare che oscilla fra ignoranza o indifferenza e premura di definire con chiarezza la specificità della tradizione romana rispetto ad alcune imposizione trullane di cui si conserva un ricordo di illiceità. Dopo aver contestualizzato il ricorso al canone 82 da parte del partito iconodulo, l’Autrice esamina la recezione nel periodo compreso tra l’860 e l’880, un ventennio in cui i rapporti tra la Chiesa romana e la bizantina si deteriorano per l’affaire foziano. L’esame della corrispondenza tra Fozio e Nicolò I permette sia di escludere una conoscenza approfondita e precipua degli atti conciliari da parte del papa e dei suoi canonisti, sia di individuare i segni della percezione del Quinisesto quale sinodo eterodossa.
Church history --- Eglise --- Sources. --- Histoire --- Sources --- Catholic Church --- History --- Europe, Western --- Europe de l'Ouest --- Histoire religieuse --- 262.5*16 --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- History. --- Councils and synods, Ecumenical --- Canon law --- Quinisext Synod --- Councils and synods, Ecumenical - History - To 1500 --- Canon law - History - To 1500 --- Church history - 7th century
Choose an application
Three chapters (Christological controversy) --- Vigilius, --- Council of Chalcedon --- 262.5*16 --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Vigilius Pope --- Council of Chalcedon, 451 --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Chalcedon, Council of, --- Concilio di Calcedonia --- Konzil von Chalkedon --- Concilium Chalcedonense --- Vigilius --- Vigile --- Vigilius, - Pope, - -555
Choose an application
This two volumed book sheds light on one of the defining eras in ecclesiastical history. Price provides a detailed and informed translation of an important and hitherto neglected Christological controversy. Richard Price is one the leading international scholars of ecclesiastical history. The Council of Constantinople of 553 (often called Constantinople II or the Fifth Ecumenical Council) has been described as 'by far the most problematic of all the councils', because it condemned two of the greatest biblical scholars and commentators of the patristic era - Origen and Theodore of Mopsuestia - and because the pope of the day, Vigilius, first condemned the council and then confirmed its decisions only under duress. The present edition makes accessible to the modern reader the acts of the council, session by session, and the most important related documents, particularly those that reveal the shifting stance of Pope Vigilius, veering between heroic resistance and abject compliance. The accompanying commentary and substantial introduction provide a background narrative of developments since Chalcedon, a full analysis of the policy of the emperor Justinian (who summoned and dominated the council) and of the issues in the debate, and information on the complex history of both the text and the council's reception. The editor argues that the work of the council deserves a more sympathetic evaluation that it has generally received in western Christendom, since it arguably clarified rather than distorted the message of Chalcedon and influenced the whole subsequent tradition of eastern Orthodoxy. In interpreting Chalcedon the conciliar acts provide a fascinating example of how a society - in this case the imperial Church of Byzantium - determines its identity by how it understands its past.
Church history --- Three chapters (Christological controversy) --- Council of Constantinople --- 262.5*16 --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Eglise --- Sources --- Histoire --- Church history - Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600 --- Church history - Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600. --- Constantinople --- Concile de Constantinople (553)
Choose an application
Cet ouvrage examine la manière avec laquelle les canons du concile in Trullo (VIIe siècle) sont interprétés par les scholiastes du XIIe s., Alexis Aristénos, Jean Zonaras et Théodore Balsamon. Dans l’introduction, le livre présente la deuxième moitié du XIIe s., ainsi que les enjeux les plus importants dans les rapports entre l’État et l’Église. Il expose les maigres renseignements biographiques sur les trois scholiastes ainsi que les connaissances que nous avons sur la formation et l’évolution des nomocanons depuis l’époque de leur apparition au VIe jusqu’à leur cristallisation au XIIe s. L’introduction s’achève avec la présentation sommaire du concile in Trullo et de ses thématiques les plus importantes. À cette introduction suivent la présentation du texte des canons et des commentaires, leur traduction en français, qui est la première traduction, en ce qui concerne les commentaires, en langue moderne, et des notes philologiques, littéraires et historiques sur le texte, la traduction et la manière avec laquelle les scholiastes ont compris le canon et l’ont interprété dans le contexte du XIIe s.
877.3 --- 262.4 "06/07" --- 262.5*16 --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- 262.4 "06/07" Bisschoppensynodes. Bijzondere concilies--?"06/07" --- Bisschoppensynodes. Bijzondere concilies--?"06/07" --- 877.3 Byzantijnse literatuur --- Byzantijnse literatuur
Choose an application
These canons (or rules) for church organization and life and Christian morals issued at a council held in Constantinople in 691/2 form the foundation of Byzantine Canon Law. They show an intense concern to restore the proper discipline of clerical life after the chaos brought about by the Arab invasions. The rules for the laity show a concern to secure obedience to the Church’s rules about marriage, proper respect for sacred space, and the suppression of customs of pagan origin. Particular interest attaches to the canons that express disapproval of certain customs of the Western Church and of the Armenian Church. Was this an attempt to impose Byzantine hegemony, or simply a revulsion at customs that seemed wrong? The Byzantine emperor tried repeatedly to get the Pope to give the new canons the stamp of his approval; his failure marks an important stage in the mounting divergence between the Greek and the Roman Churches. The translation is accompanied by full annotation, while the introduction sets the council in its historical context, in both the history of the early medieval world and the development of Eastern canon law.
Quinisext Synod --- Church history --- Canon law --- Public law (Canon law) --- Law --- Ecclesiastical law --- Rescripts, Papal --- History --- Catholic Church --- Concilio Trullano --- Concilium Quinisextum --- Council in Trullo --- Synod in Trullo --- Trullan Synod --- Concilium Trullanum --- Councils and synods --- Councils and synods (Canon law) --- Christian life --- Byzantine Empire --- Religious life and customs. --- 262.5*16 --- 262.4 "06/07" --- 262.4 "06/07" Bisschoppensynodes. Bijzondere concilies--?"06/07" --- Bisschoppensynodes. Bijzondere concilies--?"06/07" --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680)
Choose an application
Councils and synods, Ecumenical. --- Canon law --- Conciles et synodes oecuméniques --- Droit canonique --- Orthodox Eastern Church. --- Eglise orthodoxe --- Orthodox Eastern Church --- Doctrines --- Early works to 1800. --- History. --- Quinisext Synod --- Councils and synods, Ecumenical --- History --- 262.5*16 --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Conciles et synodes oecuméniques --- Quinisext Synod (691 : Constantinople) --- Councils and synods --- Byzantine Empire --- Istanbul (Turkey) --- Sources --- Canon law - Orthodox Eastern Church --- Concile de Constantinople (692) --- Constantinople --- Conciles et synodes œcuméniques. --- Concilie van Constantinopel (692). --- Église orthodoxe. --- Église orthodoxe --- Histoire. --- Concile Quinisexte
Choose an application
Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum: Sub Auspiciis Academiae Scientiarum : Bavaricae Ed. Series 2, Vol 2, Pt 1 Concilium Universal Constantinopolitanum
262.5*16 --- 262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680) --- 262.5 --- 262.5 Oecumenische concilies:--algemeen --- Oecumenische concilies:--algemeen --- Councils and synods, Ecumenical --- Catholic Church --- History --- Council of Constantinople --- Religion --- Philosophy & Religion --- Christianity --- Ecumenical councils and synods --- Oecumenical councils and synods --- Church of Rome --- Roman Catholic Church --- Katholische Kirche --- Katolyt︠s︡ʹka t︠s︡erkva --- Römisch-Katholische Kirche --- Römische Kirche --- Ecclesia Catholica --- Eglise catholique --- Eglise catholique-romaine --- Katolicheskai︠a︡ t︠s︡erkovʹ --- Chiesa cattolica --- Iglesia Católica --- Kościół Katolicki --- Katolicki Kościół --- Kościół Rzymskokatolicki --- Nihon Katorikku Kyōkai --- Katholikē Ekklēsia --- Gereja Katolik --- Kenesiyah ha-Ḳatolit --- Kanisa Katoliki --- כנסיה הקתולית --- כנסייה הקתולית --- 가톨릭교 --- 천주교 --- Councils and synods, Ecumenical - Sources
Choose an application
Im Jahr 536 wurde in Konstantinopel ein Konzil einberufen, auf dem Anthimos, der Bischof der Hauptstadt, nach nur einem Jahr Amtszeit abgesetzt und zahlreiche Bischöfe mit ihm als Häretiker verurteilt und aus der Stadt verbannt wurden. Bei diesem Ereignis handelte es sich um die jüngste Eskalation in den kirchenpolitischen Auseinandersetzungen, die nach dem Konzil von Chalkedon 451 die Kirche erschütterten – es sollte sich als Wendepunkt in der Kirchenpolitik Justinians (527–565) erweisen. Patrick Brimioulle rekonstruiert den genauen Ablauf des Konzils, seine Organisation und sein Verhältnis zur bisherigen kaiserlichen Kirchenpolitik sowie seine Einbettung in die kirchenpolitischen Auseinandersetzungen seiner Zeit. Brimioulle untersucht die gesellschaftlichen Dynamiken bei religiösen Streitigkeiten und beleuchtet damit erstmals die kirchenpolitischen Verwicklungen auch aus sozialgeschichtlicher Perspektive. Im Zentrum steht dabei, wie es zur Ausformung einer spezifischen eigenen Identität und zur Bildung unterschiedlicher Parteien unter Bischöfen, Mönchen und gewöhnlichen Gemeindemitgliedern kam.
262.5*16
---
262.5*16 Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680)
---
Constantinopel II, III--(553, 680)
---
E-books
---
Kaiser
---
Kirchenpolitik
---
Konzil
---
Mönch
---
Kirche
---
Synode
---
Geschichte 491-536
---
Byzantinisches Reich
---
Konstantinopel
---
Syrien
---
(Produktform)Electronic book text
---
Alte Geschichte
---
Chalkedon
---
Christologie
---
Justinian
---
Konzilien
---
Miaphysitismus
---
Sozialgeschichte
---
(VLB-WN)9553
---
Christliche Kirche
---
Ekklesiologie
---
Kirchengemeinde
---
Christentum
---
Volk Gottes
---
Ekklesia
---
Konfessionspolitik
---
Religionspolitik
---
Mönche
---
Ordensleute
---
Ordenspriester
---
Konventuale
---
Laienbruder
---
Nonne
---
Allgemeines Konzil
---
Ökumenisches Konzil
---
Kaisertum
---
Herrscher
---
Kaiserin
---
Kaiserreich
---
536
---
<
Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|