Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Défense (procédure pénale) --- Durtette, Vincent --- Defense (Criminal procedure) --- Criminal defenses --- Defense (Law) --- Defenses, Criminal --- Actions and defenses --- Criminal procedure --- Due process of law --- Trial practice --- Public defenders --- Défense (procédure pénale)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Defense (Criminal procedure) --- 34 <09> --- Criminal defenses --- Defense (Law) --- Defenses, Criminal --- Actions and defenses --- Criminal procedure --- Due process of law --- Trial practice --- Public defenders --- 34 <09> Rechtsgeschiedenis --(algemeen) --- Rechtsgeschiedenis --(algemeen) --- History --- Criminal law. Criminal procedure --- Germany

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Criminal procedure --- -Defense (Criminal procedure) --- -Criminal defenses --- Defense (Law) --- Defenses, Criminal --- Actions and defenses --- Due process of law --- Trial practice --- Public defenders --- Criminal law --- Courts --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Procedure (Law) --- Public law --- Appellate procedure --- Criminal courts --- Pleading and practice --- Law and legislation --- Remmelink, Jan --- Remmelink, J. --- Defense (Criminal procedure) --- -Remmelink, Jan --- Remmelink, Jan. --- Criminal defenses --- Remmelink, J.. --- Procédure pénale

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

343.12 <492> --- Strafvordering: partijen, aanklacht, verweer, dagvaarding, voorarrest, prejudiciele geschillen--Nederland --- Defense (Criminal procedure) --- 343.12 <492> Strafvordering: partijen, aanklacht, verweer, dagvaarding, voorarrest, prejudiciele geschillen--Nederland --- Criminal defenses --- Defense (Law) --- Defenses, Criminal --- Actions and defenses --- Criminal procedure --- Due process of law --- Trial practice --- Public defenders

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The law has struggled for many years with the problem of how to accommodate those who commit crimes due to threats or circumstances. The modern ambivalence surrounding the defences of duress and necessity has its origins in the legal past. To date the defences of duress and necessity have been couched in terms such as compulsion, involuntariness and human frailty, resulting in the true nature of the defences being hidden. Psychologists and legal theorists have begun to re-examine the role of emotions in human action, including their effect upon behaviour and choice. In light of recent breakthroughs, Eimear Spain considers how the emotions experienced by those who act due to threats, both human and natural in origin, should affect the attribution of criminal responsibility and punishment. The understanding of emotions extrapolated in this book points towards a new rationale for the existing defences of duress and necessity.

Duress (Law) --- Necessity (Law) --- Defense (Criminal procedure) --- Criminal defenses --- Defense (Law) --- Defenses, Criminal --- Actions and defenses --- Criminal procedure --- Due process of law --- Trial practice --- Public defenders --- State of necessity --- Assistance in emergencies --- Criminal liability --- Justification (Law) --- Liability (Law) --- Self-defense (Law) --- Self-help (Law) --- Coercion (Law) --- Compulsion --- Law --- Threats --- Torts --- Undue influence --- Law and legislation --- General and Others