Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

There are numerous popular myths concerning Hispanic America in German and Austrian textbooks from the first decade of the 21st century, and thus there is a big gap between historical narratives in textbooks and the scientific historical discourse. An analysis of textbooks from four centuries shows, that some of the myths were introduced into the textbooks in the twentieth century – for example the “myth of the flat earth” of medieval times. The myths relating to Hispanic America and the images and assumptions they conveyed were important to many different groups throughout history, became incorporated into collective memory and were uncritically incorporated into German and Austrian textbooks. Das Thema Hispanoamerika ist in deutschen und österreichischen Geschichtsschulbüchern aus dem ersten Jahrzehnt des 21. Jahrhunderts massiv von populären Geschichtsmythen geprägt, was eine große Kluft zwischen Schulbuchdiskurs und Fachwissenschaft zur Folge hat. Teilweise gelangten die Mythen - wie beispielsweise die Erzählung über die von Kolumbus überwundene vermeintlich flache Erde des Mittelalters - erst im 20. Jahrhundert in die Lehrwerke, was anhand einer Analyse von Schulbüchern aus vier Jahrhunderten gezeigt werden kann. Die Mythen zu Hispanoamerika und ihre verschiedenen Basisannahmen waren für verschiedene Kollektive im Laufe der Geschichte wichtige Tradierungsbedürfnisse, wurden Teil des kollektiven Bewusstseins und unhinterfragt in deutsche und österreichische Schulbücher übernommen.

Textbooks --- Textbook research --- Columbus --- Cortés --- Latin America --- Flat earth --- Historical Myths --- Didactics of History --- Schulbücher --- Schulbuchforschung --- Kolumbus --- Lateinamerika --- Flache Erde --- Geschichtsmythen --- Geschichtsdidaktik --- Bartolomé de Las Casas --- Christoph Kolumbus --- Indigene Völker --- Indigene Völker Südamerikas --- Mythos --- Spanien

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The main reason why Latin America is a cultural diverse region is because of the indigenous peoples who inhabit it. That is why indigenous peoples' interests on their cultural property have to be taken into account when this matter is to be legally regulated in Latin American countries. In order to ascertain whether that has occurred, the book explores relevant legal instruments at the international and regional levels and compares national norms in some Latin American countries, particularly those concerning ownership. It concludes that recognition of indigenous interests in Latin American law on cultural property is still a pending task. Die Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Frage: Wie ist der Schutz von Kulturgütern in Lateinamerika rechtlich geregelt, und in welcher Weise werden indigene Kulturgüter innerhalb solcher Regelungen berücksichtigt? Die Frage besteht aus zwei Teilen. Der erste Teil betrifft eine vergleichende Analyse der geltenden Regelungen über den Schutz materieller Kulturgüter Lateinamerikas. Unterstrichen wird dabei ein Aspekt des Rechtsschutzes von Kulturgütern, nämlich die Regelung des Eigentums. Der zweite Teil der Frage, der sich auf die Berücksichtigung der materiellen Kulturgüter der indigenen Völker bezieht, wird bei der Untersuchung der verschiedenen Rechtsinstrumente beachtet. Dabei geht die Arbeit von der Annahme aus, dass die indigenen Völker ein Interesse an der Kontrolle der mit ihrer Kultur verbundenen Güter haben, welches von den Rechtsnormen in der Regel nicht in Betracht gezogen wird.

Cultural property --- Protection --- Latin America --- Antiquities --- Protection. --- Cultural heritage --- Cultural patrimony --- Cultural resources --- Heritage property --- National heritage --- National patrimony --- National treasure --- Patrimony, Cultural --- Treasure, National --- Property --- World Heritage areas --- Asociación Latinoamericana de Libre Comercio countries --- Neotropical region --- Neotropics --- New World tropics --- Spanish America --- cultural assets --- Archäologie --- Dekret --- Guatemala --- Indigene Völker --- Konvention --- Kulturgut --- San Salvador --- UNESCO

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"In the landmark 1978 case Oliphant v. Suquamish, the Supreme Court ruled that no Indian tribe can lawfully prosecute non-Indians. This decision had far-reaching effects in subsequent disputes about the jurisdiction of American Indian tribes, the terms of their relationship to the United States, their powers as political entities, and the significance of Indian reservations. Yet, even though few developments have highlighted the tensions, hopes, and fears associated with American Indians' unique political-legal status as clearly as contemporary tribal governments' assertion of jurisdiction over non-Indians, that subject hasn't received the attention it deserves from historians. The Non-Indian Problem recounts the history of tribes' desire for inclusive jurisdiction and the circumstances that encouraged them finally to act on that desire in the twentieth century. The manuscript focuses on the legal battles of the Quinault and Suquamish tribes beginning in the 1960s and culminating in the 1978 decision, with an epilogue addressing the consequences of that ruling"--

Selbstbestimmungsrecht --- Rechtsstellung --- Reservat --- Quinault --- Squamish --- Indigenes Volk --- Trials. --- Sovereignty. --- Indians of North America --- LAW --- Suquamish Indians --- American aborigines --- American Indians --- First Nations (North America) --- Indians of the United States --- Indigenous peoples --- Native Americans --- North American Indians --- Soquamish Indians --- Squamish Indians (Wash.) --- Squawmish Indians (Wash.) --- Sukwamish Indians --- Suquahmish Indians --- Swokwabish Indians --- Puget Sound Salish Indians --- Sovereignty --- State sovereignty (International relations) --- International law --- Political science --- Common heritage of mankind (International law) --- International relations --- Self-determination, National --- Acts, Legislative --- Enactments, Legislative --- Laws (Statutes) --- Legislative acts --- Legislative enactments --- Jurisprudence --- Legislation --- State trials --- Court proceedings --- Procedure (Law) --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- General. --- Culture --- Ethnology --- Law and legislation --- Washington --- Washington (State) --- Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Madison Reservation, Washington. --- Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Madison Reservation, Washington --- Suquamish Indian Tribe --- Suquamish Tribe --- Washington Territory --- Estado de Washington --- Evergreen State --- Huashengdun (State) --- Huashengdun zhou --- Iyālāt-i Vāshingtun --- Medinat Ṿashingṭon --- Ouasingkton (State) --- Politeia tēs Ouasingkton --- Shtat Vashynhton --- Štát Washington --- State of Washington --- Statul Washington --- Tiẻ̂u bang Washington --- Vashington muzh --- Vashington (State) --- Vāshingtun (State) --- Vashynhton (State) --- Vaşington Eyaleti --- Vaşington (State) --- Vašingtona (State) --- Vašingtonas (State) --- Vasingtonia (State) --- Vaŝingtonio (State) --- Vaşinqton (State) --- Vaşinqton ştatı --- WA --- Wakinekona (State) --- Wascington (State) --- Wash. (State) --- Washington állam --- Washingtoni osariik --- Washinton-shū --- Washinton (State) --- Wāshinṭun (State) --- Waszyngton (State) --- Wŏsingt'ŏn (State) --- Wŏsingt'ŏnju --- Πολιτεία της Ουάσινγκτον --- Ουασινγκτον (State) --- Штат Вашингтон --- Вашынгтон (State) --- Вашингтон (State) --- Вашингтон муж --- מדינת וושינגטון --- וואשינגטאן (State) --- וושינגטון (State) --- ايالت واشنگتن --- واشنطن (State) --- واشنگتن (State) --- ワシントン (State) --- ワシントン州 --- 华盛顿 (State) --- 华盛顿州 --- 워싱턴 (State) --- 워싱턴주 --- Trials, litigation, etc. --- Selbstbestimmung --- Urbevölkerung --- Ureinwohner --- Eingeborener --- Indigene Völker --- Eingeborene --- Aborigines --- Indigene Bevölkerung --- Bevölkerung --- Einwohner --- Volk --- Kolonialvolk --- Bedrohtes Volk --- Naturvolk --- Indigene Frau --- Skwxwú7mesh --- Skewamish --- Skwamish --- Skay-wa-mish --- Squawmish --- Skihwamish --- Soquamish --- Sukwamish --- Suquahmish --- Swokwabish --- Suquamish --- Küsten-Salish --- Quinaetl --- Kwinaiult --- Quinaielt --- Indianer --- Reservation --- Rechtsstatus --- Rechtslage --- Status --- Recht --- United States --- Iyālāt-i Vāshingtun --- Medinat VÌ£ashingtÌ£on --- Politeia tēs Ouasingkton --- Štát Washington --- Tiẻ̂u bang Washington --- Vāshingtun (State) --- Vaşington Eyaleti --- Vaşington (State) --- Vašingtona (State) --- Vašingtonas (State) --- Vaŝingtonio (State) --- Vaşinqton (State) --- Vaşinqton ştatı --- Washington állam --- Washinton-shū --- WāshintÌ£un (State) --- Wŏsingt'ŏn (State) --- Wŏsingt'ŏnju --- Skwxwú7mesh --- Küsten-Salish --- Urbevölkerung --- Indigene Völker --- Indigene Bevölkerung --- Bevölkerung --- Indigener --- Indigener Mann --- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) --- Indigenous people --- Indigenous people of North America