Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The economic thinking around the role of agriculture for development has evolved since the 1950s. Over the past decades, the agriculture sector has been rediscovered as a sector with great potential for triggering growth, reducing poverty and inequality, providing food security, and delivering environmental services. This paper contributes to the literature on the determinants of agricultural development by investigating the role played by laws and regulations. First, the paper proposes new measures of regulatory quality and regulatory efficiency in agriculture. Second, the paper employs cross-section data to test the relationship of the proposed measures with agricultural performance. The results indicate that agricultural productivity is on average higher where transaction costs imposed by regulations are lower and where countries adhere to more regulatory good practices. This relationship is stronger when low transaction costs and regulatory good practices are combined.

Agribusiness --- Business Regulations --- Legal Institutions --- Structural Change

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This paper summarizes the empirical evidence on the role of justice in economic development, conflict, and trust in institutions. It finds that justice institutions play a significant role in economic development, particularly through their impact on credit markets and firm growth, the protection of vulnerable populations, their capacity to deter violence, and their influence over people's trust in formal institutions. The paper then considers the promise of administrative data, machine learning, and randomized controlled trials to enhance the efficiency, access, and quality of justice. The paper concludes by discussing new avenues for research and the potential for data to improve the functioning of justice systems in the age of COVID-19.

Access To Justice --- Governance --- Law and Development --- Law and Justice Institutions --- Legal Institutions --- Rule of Law

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A survey of the reign of Henry II, offering a range of new evaluations and interpretations. Henry II is the most imposing figure among the medieval kings of England. His fiefs and domains extended from the Atlantic to the Mediterranean, and his court was frequented by the greatest thinkers and men of letters of his time, besides ambassadors from all over Europe. Yet his is a reign of paradoxes: best known for his dramatic conflicts with his own wife and sons and with Thomas Becket, it was also a crucial period in the evolution of legal and governmental institutions. Here experts in the field provide significant reevaluations of its most important aspects. Topics include Henry's accession and his relations with the papacy, the French king, other rulers in the British Isles and the Norman baronage; the development of the common law and the coinage; the court and its literary milieu; the use of Arthurian legend for political purposes; and the career of the Young King Henry, while the introduction examines the historiography of the reign. CONTRIBUTORS: MARTIN ALLEN, MARTIN AURELL, NICK BARRATT, PAUL BRAND, SEAN DUFFY, ANNE DUGGAN, JEAN DUBABIN, JOHN GILLINGHAM, EDMUND KING, DANIEL POWER, IAN SHORT, MATTHEW STRICKLAND. CHRISTOPHER HARPER-BILL and NICHOLAS VINCENT are Professors of Medieval History at the University of East Anglia.

Henry --- Hendrik --- Henricus --- Great Britain --- England --- Kings and rulers. --- History --- Kings and rulers --- HISTORY / Medieval. --- Henry II. --- Legal institutions. --- Medieval king. --- Political history.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The institutional landscape of local dispute resolution in Bangladesh is rich: it includes the traditional process of shalish, longstanding and impressive civil society efforts to improve on shalish, and a somewhat less-explored provision for gram adalat or village courts. Based on a nationally representative survey, qualitative evidence from focus groups, and a telephone survey of 40 Union Parishad chairpersons (a little less than 1 percent of the total Union Parishads), it provides both an empirical mapping of local conflict and justice and pointers to possible policy reforms. It suggests a number of opportunities for strengthening local justice and argues that the village courts may pose a useful bridge between Bangladesh's informal and formal justice institutions.

Gender and Law --- Judicial System Reform --- Justice --- Law and Development --- Legal Institutions of the Market Economy --- Legal Products --- Local conflict --- Local dispute resolution --- Policy reforms --- Public Sector Corruption & Anticorruption Measures --- Qualitative evidence

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Public interest litigation has historically been an innovative judicial procedure for enhancing the social and economic rights of disadvantaged and marginalized groups in India. In recent years, however, a number of criticisms of public interest litigation have emerged, including concerns related to separation of powers, judicial capacity, and inequality. These criticisms have tended to abstraction, and the sheer number of cases has complicated empirical assessments. This paper finds that public interest litigation cases constitute less than 1 percent of the overall case load. The paper argues that complaints related to concerns having to do with separation of powers are better understood as criticisms of the impact of judicial interventions on sector governance. On the issue of inequality, the analysis finds that win rates for fundamental rights claims are significantly higher when the claimant is from an advantaged social group than when he or she is from a marginalized group, which constitutes a social reversal, both from the original objective of public interest litigation and from the relative win rates in the 1980s.

Access to justice --- Administration of justice --- Case law --- Civil law --- Corruption --- Court --- Courts --- Criminal --- Fundamental right --- Fundamental rights --- Gender --- Gender and Law --- Human Rights --- Human rights --- Inequality --- Information Security and Privacy --- Judges --- Justices --- Law and Development --- Law Enforcement Systems --- Laws --- Legal Institutions of the Market Economy --- Prisoners --- Rule of law --- Sexual harassment --- Social Development --- Social justice --- Will