Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The United States use of "zeroing" in its antidumping procedures has become a political flash point threatening some legitimacy of the WTO's dispute settlement system. This paper provides a positive analysis of the zeroing issue, explains how it has evolved and who is likely to be affected by it. The authors use economic theory to identify how export price volatility accentuates the impact of zeroing on the size of U.S. antidumping tariffs and review the WTO caseload over zeroing. They describe the impact that the U.S.'s retrospective system for assessing antidumping margins has on zeroing and the political economy implications as the U.S. struggles to generate policy reform. The authors survey existing evidence of the impact of the zeroing on dumping margins and contribute their own evidence to suggest that zeroing is just as likely to impact the size of U.S. antidumping duties applied on developing country exports as developed economy exports. Thus while developed economies have filed the vast majority of WTO disputes against the U.S. over zeroing, the authors conclude that zeroing is also likely a relevant issue for developing country exporters as over 60 percent of the product lines currently subject to U.S. antidumping are exported by developing countries.

Access to Markets --- Average price --- Commerce --- Dumping --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Export markets --- Fair --- Home market --- Input prices --- International Economics and Trade --- International trade --- Law and Development --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market access --- Market price --- Market prices --- Markets and Market Access --- Price levels --- Price variation --- Price volatility --- Private Sector Development --- Purchasing --- Retail --- Sales --- Spread --- Suppliers --- Trade Law --- WTO

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In the long view, recent grain price volatility is not anomalous. Wheat, rice, and maize are highly substitutable in the global market for calories, and when aggregate stocks decline to minimal feasible levels, prices become highly sensitive to small shocks, consistent with storage models. In this decade, stocks have declined due to high income growth and biofuels mandates. Recently, shocks including the Australian drought and biofuels demand boosts due to the oil price spike were exacerbated by a sequence of trade restrictions by key exporters beginning in the thin global rice market in the fall of 2007, which turned market anxiety into panic. To protect vulnerable consumers, countries intervened in storage markets and, if they were exporters, to limit trade access. Recognizing these realities, vulnerable countries are building strategic reserves. The associated expense and negative incentive effects can be controlled if reserves have quantitative targets related to the consumption needs of the most vulnerable, with distribution to the latter only in severe emergencies. More-ambitious plans manipulate world prices via buffer stocks or naked short speculation to keep prices consistent with fundamentals. Past interventions of either kind have been expensive, ineffective, and generally short-lived. Further, there is no significant evidence that prices do not reflect fundamentals, including export market access.

Access to Markets --- Commodity price --- Commodity prices --- Cost increases --- Domestic market --- Export market --- Free market --- International Economics & Trade --- International trade --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market access --- Market price --- Market prices --- Market volatility --- Marketing --- Markets and Market Access --- Petroleum prices --- Price changes --- Price fluctuations --- Price increases --- Price risk --- Price volatility --- Stocks --- Volatility

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The United States use of "zeroing" in its antidumping procedures has become a political flash point threatening some legitimacy of the WTO's dispute settlement system. This paper provides a positive analysis of the zeroing issue, explains how it has evolved and who is likely to be affected by it. The authors use economic theory to identify how export price volatility accentuates the impact of zeroing on the size of U.S. antidumping tariffs and review the WTO caseload over zeroing. They describe the impact that the U.S.'s retrospective system for assessing antidumping margins has on zeroing and the political economy implications as the U.S. struggles to generate policy reform. The authors survey existing evidence of the impact of the zeroing on dumping margins and contribute their own evidence to suggest that zeroing is just as likely to impact the size of U.S. antidumping duties applied on developing country exports as developed economy exports. Thus while developed economies have filed the vast majority of WTO disputes against the U.S. over zeroing, the authors conclude that zeroing is also likely a relevant issue for developing country exporters as over 60 percent of the product lines currently subject to U.S. antidumping are exported by developing countries.

Access to Markets --- Average price --- Commerce --- Dumping --- Economic Theory & Research --- Emerging Markets --- Export markets --- Fair --- Home market --- Input prices --- International Economics and Trade --- International trade --- Law and Development --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market access --- Market price --- Market prices --- Markets and Market Access --- Price levels --- Price variation --- Price volatility --- Private Sector Development --- Purchasing --- Retail --- Sales --- Spread --- Suppliers --- Trade Law --- WTO

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The 2006-08 commodity price boom was one of the longest and broadest of the post-World War II period. Apart from strong and sustained economic growth, the recent boom was fueled by numerous factors, including low past investment in extractive commodities, weak dollar, fiscal expansion, and lax monetary policy in many countries, and investment fund activity. At the same time, the combination of adverse weather conditions, the diversion of some food commodities to the production of biofuels, and government policies (including export bans and prohibitive taxes) brought global stocks of many food commodities down to levels not seen since the early 1970s. This in turn accelerated the price increases that eventually led to the 2008 rally. The weakening and/or reversal of these factors coupled with the financial crisis that erupted in September 2008 and the subsequent global economic downturn, induced sharp price declines across most commodity sectors. Yet, the main price indices are still twice as high compared to their 2000 real levels, begging once more the question about the real factors affecting them. This paper concludes that a stronger link between energy and non-energy commodity prices is likely to be the dominant influence on developments in commodity, and especially food, markets. Demand by emerging economies is unlikely to put additional pressure on the prices of food commodities. The paper also argues that the effect of biofuels on food prices has not been as large as originally thought, but that the use of commodities by financial investors (the so-called "financialization of commodities") may have been partly responsible for the 2007/08 spike. Finally, econometric analysis of the long-term evolution of commodity prices supports the thesis that price variability overwhelms price trends.

Agricultural price --- Agricultural prices --- Commodities --- Commodity price --- Commodity prices --- Cotton prices --- Demand growth --- E-Business --- Emerging Markets --- Energy --- Energy prices --- Energy Production and Transportation --- Inflation --- Inventories --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market prices --- Markets and Market Access --- Petroleum prices --- Price changes --- Price increase --- Price increases --- Price index --- Price indices --- Price trends --- Private Sector Development --- Spot price --- Stocks --- World market

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The current financial crisis has highlighted the danger that declines in confidence can have a self-fulfilling effect on economic activity. In this paper, the authors consider ways of measuring investor and consumer confidence, and try to explain the evolution of confidence using measures of financial volatility, investment performance, macroeconomic outcomes, and policy actions. They identify a link between investor and consumer confidence. Finally, they show that liquidity provision and easing of interest rates had only a limited effect on financial market spreads during the crisis, arguing for additional measures to address the loss of confidence. The paper focuses on the need for financial regulatory reform, and shows how the incentives to cooperate in this area are stimulated by a common shock to confidence.

Access to Finance --- Banks and Banking Reform --- Central banks --- Currencies and Exchange Rates --- Debt Markets --- Developing countries --- Economic Theory and Research --- Emerging Markets --- Federal reserve --- Finance and Financial Sector Development --- Financial crisis --- Financial Intermediation --- Financial market --- Financial markets --- Financial system --- Global economy --- Government policy --- Interest rates --- International bank --- International finance --- Investor confidence --- Liquidity --- Loss of confidence --- Macroeconomic conditions --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market prices --- Markets and Market Access --- Policy responses --- Private Sector Development --- Securities --- Stock market