Listing 1 - 10 of 64 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Interesting and important ethical questions confront researchers, regulators, institutional review boards, support personnel, and research participants committed to the ethical conduct of human subjects research at all stages of research. Questions encompass - but are not limited to - study design, enrolling participants, balancing the clinical needs of participants against the research agenda, ending trials, discharging post-trial obligations, and resolving conflicts. Straightforward solutions to these types of questions are often not found in regulations, ethics codes, or the bioethics liter
Choose an application
This volume brings together a group of researchers from different European countries and disciplines who are involved in Clinical Ethics Consultation (CEC). The work provides a discussion on the theories and methods underlying CEC and on the issues of implementation and evaluation.
Choose an application
Choose an application
The authors have produced a step-by-step guide to negotiating an internal consultation; and they have comprehensively described their theoretical framework and the consultation work itself, based on their own application of systemic thinking.
Choose an application
"Argumentation between Doctors and Patients discusses the use of argumentation in clinical settings. Starting from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, it aims at providing an understanding of argumentative discourse in the context of doctor-patient interaction. It explains when and how interactions between doctors and patients can be reconstructed as argumentative, what it means for doctors and patients to reasonably resolve a difference of opinion, what it implies to strive simultaneously for reasonableness and effectiveness in clinical discourse, and when such efforts derail into fallaciousness. Argumentation between Doctors and Patients is of interest to all those who seek to improve their understanding of argumentation in a medical context - whether they are students, scholars of argumentation, or medical practitioners. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie are prominent argumentation theorists. In writing Argumentation between Doctors and Patients, they have benefited from the advice of an Advisory Board consisting of both medical practitioners and argumentation scholars"--
Medical consultation. --- Medical cooperation. --- Physician-Patient Relations.
Choose an application
Medical consultation. --- Women --- Diseases --- Treatment --- Decision making.
Choose an application
Medical consultation. --- Time management. --- Medical care --- Norway.
Listing 1 - 10 of 64 | << page >> |
Sort by
|