Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Polémique dans la littérature --- Sinclair, Upton, --- Sinclair, Upton,
Choose an application
The Roman emperor Constantius II (337-361) has frequently been maligned as a heretic, standing in sharp contrast to his father Constantine I, who set in motion the Christianisation of the Roman world and the establishment of Nicene orthodoxy. This reputation is the result of the overwhelmingly negative presentation of Constantius in the surviving literature written by orthodox Christians, who regarded him as an 'Arian' persecutor. This volume presents new translations of texts that were central to the shaping of this hostile legacy: Athanasius of Alexandria's History of the Arians, Hilary of Poitiers' Against Constantius and Lucifer of Cagliari's The Necessity of Dying for the Son of God. These contemporary invectives against the emperor were composed by three bishops who all opposed Constantius' religious policies and were exiled by the imperial and ecclesiastical authorities during the 350s. By constructing polemical accounts of their sufferings at the hands of the emperor and his supporters, these authors drew on the traditions of both classical rhetoric and Christian persecution literature in order to cast Constantius as imitating villains such as Ahab, Judas and Nero, while presenting themselves as fearless opponents of impious tyranny. Moreover, as the earliest surviving invectives against a living Roman emperor, the writings of these three bishops offer a unique opportunity to understand the place of polemical literature in the political culture of the later Roman empire. The translations are accompanied by a substantial introduction and notes which provide a clear guide to the historical and theological context of the period, as well as literary analysis of the texts themselves. This volume will therefore be valuable both to those studying the religious and political history of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages and also to anyone interested in the development of Roman rhetoric and early Christian literature. -b32549465-Publisher.
Christian literature, Early --- Church history --- Polemics in literature. --- Littérature chrétienne primitive --- Eglise --- Polémique dans la littérature --- Translations into English --- Traductions anglaises --- Histoire --- Constantius --- Public opinion. --- Public opinion --- Bishops --- Arianism --- Christian literature, Early. --- Church history. --- Attitudes. --- Athanasius, --- Hilarius, --- Lucifer, --- 300-399. --- Attitudes --- Littérature chrétienne primitive --- Polémique dans la littérature
Choose an application
In Het plagiaat analyseert Ewoud Kieft de polemiek tussen Menno ter Braak en Anton van Duinkerken, de twee belangrijkste Nederlandse intellectuelen uit het interbellum. Hun discussie was in de eerste plaats die tussen een atheïst en een gelovige. Nooit eerder waren vertolkers van twee tegengestelde visies zo aan elkaar gewaagd. Het conflict dat Ter Braak en Van Duinkerken in hun polemiek uitvochten, bevindt zich in het hart van de culturele modernisering in Nederland. Tegelijk biedt Het plagiaat inzicht in de grote veranderingen die de Europese cultuur tussen de twee wereldoorlogen doormaakte: de polemiek Ter Braak-Van Duinkerken draaide naast religie ook om kunst, democratie, fascisme en de verantwoordelijkheid van de intellectueel in een samenleving die in barbarij dreigt te vervallen.
Polemics in literature --- Polémique dans la littérature --- Polemics in literature. --- Braak, Menno ter, --- Duinkerken, Anton von --- Duinkerken, Anton van, --- Duinkerken, van, Anton --- Polémique dans la littérature --- 839.3 "19" --- 839.3 "19" Nederlandse literatuur--20e eeuw. Periode 1900-1999 --- Nederlandse literatuur--20e eeuw. Periode 1900-1999 --- Van Duinkerken, Anton, --- Doorn, Andries van, --- Bakx, Pieter, --- Asselbergs, Willem Jan Marie Anton, --- Ter Braak, Menno, --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Braak, ter, Menno --- Nederland. --- Ter Braak, Menno --- Braak, Menno ter --- Braak, Menno ter, - 1902-1940. --- Plagiat
Choose an application
Church controversies --- Jansenists --- Polemics in literature --- Philosophy, French --- Controverses religieuses --- Jansénistes --- Polémique dans la littérature --- Philosophie française --- History --- Histoire --- Pascal, Blaise, --- Arnauld, Antoine, --- Thèmes, motifs --- Polemics in literature. --- Jésuites dans la littérature. --- Criticism and interpretation. --- 273.711 --- 273.7 <44 PORT-ROYAL> --- 1 PASCAL, BLAISE --- Geschiedenis van het jansenisme:--tot 1653 --- Jansenisme in Port-Royal --- Filosofie. Psychologie--PASCAL, BLAISE --- 1 PASCAL, BLAISE Filosofie. Psychologie--PASCAL, BLAISE --- 273.7 <44 PORT-ROYAL> Jansenisme in Port-Royal --- 273.711 Geschiedenis van het jansenisme:--tot 1653 --- Jansénistes --- Polémique dans la littérature --- Philosophie française --- Thèmes, motifs --- Pascal, Blaise (1623-1662) --- Abbaye de Port-Royal (Paris) --- Pascal, Blaise (1623-1662). Les provinciales --- Classicisme --- Jansénisme --- Polémique --- Jésuites --- Théologie morale --- Apologétique --- Dialogisme --- Intertextualité --- Critique et interprétation --- Et la littérature --- France --- 17e siècle --- Dans la littérature
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|