Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Targeted killing. --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Targeted killing --- Homicide --- Law and legislation --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Polemology --- Israel
Choose an application
The controversy surrounding targeted killings represents a crisis of conscience for policymakers, lawyers and philosophers grappling with the moral and legal limits of the war on terror. This text examines the legal and philosophical issues raised by government efforts to target suspected terrorists.
Targeted killing --- War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- War --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- War and morals --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Homicide --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
In 'Legitimate Target: a Criteria-Based Approach to Targeted Killing', Amos Guiora proposes that targeted killing decisions must reflect consideration of four distinct elements: law policy, morality, and operational details, thus ensuring that it complies with principles of domestic and international laws.
Targeted killing. --- Targeted killing (International law) --- Targeted killing --- Terrorism --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Prevention --- Law and legislation. --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Homicide --- International law --- War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
Political atrocities --- Targeted killing --- Death squads --- Anti-communist movements --- Indonesia --- History --- Anti-communist resistance --- Underground, Anti-communist --- Communism --- Assassins --- Vigilance committees --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Homicide --- Atrocities --- Law and legislation
Choose an application
Targeting Americans focuses on the legal debate surrounding drone strikes, the use of which has expanded significantly under the Obama Presidency as part of the continuing war against terror. Despite the political salience of the legal questions raised by targeted killing, the author asserts that there has been remarkably little careful analysis of the fundamental legal question: the constitutionality of the policy.
War and emergency powers --- Targeted killing --- Counterinsurgency --- National security --- State crimes --- Drone aircraft --- Constitutional law --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Law and legislation --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Homicide --- Drones (Aircraft) --- Pilotless aircraft --- Remotely piloted aircraft --- UAVs (Unmanned aerial vehicles) --- Unmanned aerial vehicles --- Flying-machines --- Vehicles, Remotely piloted --- Airplanes --- Crimes committed by states --- State-sponsored crimes --- Crime --- Presidents --- Radio control
Choose an application
A comprehensive analysis into the lawfulness of state-sponsored targeted killings under international human rights and humanitarian law, this book examines treaties, custom and general principles of law to determine the normative paradigms which govern the intentional use of lethal force against selected individuals in law enforcement and the conduct of hostilities. It alse addresses the relevance of the law of interstate force to targeted killings, and the interrelation of thevarious normative frameworks which may simultaneously apply to operations involving the use of lethal force. Through a
Targeted killing. --- Human rights. --- Law enforcement. --- Enforcement of law --- Criminal justice, Administration of --- Basic rights --- Civil rights (International law) --- Human rights --- Rights, Human --- Rights of man --- Human security --- Transitional justice --- Truth commissions --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Targeted killing --- Homicide --- Law and legislation --- Policing
Choose an application
Targeted killing of terrorists has become an established practice in the fight against terrorism. The disturbing consequences of the practice and its increasing political and societal acceptance raise questions as to its justifiability and its place in counter-terrorism. Anna Goppel explores whether targeted killing of terrorists can be justified, both from a moral and an international legal perspective. She discusses moral and international legal limits to state use of lethal force and argues that the moral principles and the international legal regulations allow for the practice only in very specific, very rare, and rather hypothetical cases. The analysis is based on a thorough discussion of the human right to life, the laws and ethics of war, and the relevant moral and legal arguments. This makes it of particular interest to philosophers and legal theorists interested in terrorism, counter-terrorism, human rights, and the legitimacy of defensive state measures.
General ethics --- Public law. Constitutional law --- Polemology --- Targeted killing. --- Terrorism --- War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 --- Acts of terrorism --- Attacks, Terrorist --- Global terrorism --- International terrorism --- Political terrorism --- Terror attacks --- Terrorist acts --- Terrorist attacks --- World terrorism --- Direct action --- Insurgency --- Political crimes and offenses --- Subversive activities --- Political violence --- Terror --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Targeted killing --- Homicide --- Prevention --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Law and legislation. --- Law and legislation --- Constitutional State. --- Human Rights. --- Terrorism.
Choose an application
The book explores the main moral, ethical and operational dilemmas of targeted killings from an Israeli perspective. Even though many countries contending with terrorism have adopted this tool (either overtly or covertly) within the arsenal used in implementing their counter-terrorism policies, it seems that Israel, as one of the world's leading practitioner of targeted killing in its counter-terrorism effort, constitutes the most appropriate case study for reviewing implications and dilemmas associated with this practice. Each chapter will present a different ethical–moral–operational dilemma emanating from a deployment of a targeted killing. The analysis of Israeli considerations and solutions to these dilemmas is built around interviews with Israeli decision-makers, former senior security officials and other experts. The chapters also cover public opinion polls in order to highlight the views of the Israeli public vis-a-vis each dilemma. Finally, chapters will conclude with lessons learned and offer recommendations for a practical and moral solution. The final chapter then draws together universal conclusions and recommendations for the use of targeted killings. Boaz Ganor is Founder and Executive Director of the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT), and Ronald S. Lauder Chair for Counter-Terrorism at Reichman University in Israel. Liram Koblentz-Stenzler is a senior researcher and head of the Global Far-Right Extremism Desk at the International Institute for Counter Terrorism (ICT) at Reichman University, Israel.
Targeted killing. --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Targeted killing --- Homicide --- Law and legislation --- Security, International. --- Middle East --- International law. --- Political ethics. --- International Security Studies. --- Middle Eastern Politics. --- Public International Law. --- Political Ethics. --- Politics and government. --- Ethics, Political --- Ethics in government --- Government ethics --- Political science --- Politics, Practical --- Ethics --- Civics --- Law of nations --- Nations, Law of --- Public international law --- Law --- Collective security --- International security --- International relations --- Disarmament --- International organization --- Peace --- Moral and ethical aspects
Choose an application
Under the laws of armed conflict, civilians cannot be targeted unless they take direct part in hostilities. Once civilians take action, they become targets. This book analyses the complex question of how to identify just who those civilians are. Over the past twenty-five years, significant changes in the conduct of wars have increasingly placed civilians in traditional military roles - employing civilians to execute drone strikes, the 'targeted killing' of suspected terrorists, the use of private security contractors in combat zones, and the spread of cyber attacks are amongst some of the most notable. All of these have made the process of distinguishing between civilian and military actors exceptionally fraught. This book examines the history of civilian participation in armed conflict and how the law has responded to such action. It asks the crucial question : what is 'direct participation in hostilities' ? The book slices through the attempts to untie this Gordian knot, and shows that the changing nature of warfare has called into question the very foundation of the civilian/military dichotomy that is at the heart of the law of armed conflict.
Combatants and noncombatants (International law) --- Civilians in war --- War (International law) --- Soldiers --- Targeted killing --- War --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Government policy --- Protection of civilians --- Civils et guerre --- Guerre (droit international) --- Guerre --- Droit humanitaire --- Droit --- Protection des civils --- Droit humanitaireDroit --- Civilians in war. --- Targeted killing. --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Homicide --- Hostilities --- International law --- Neutrality --- War and society --- Noncombatants (International law) --- Armed Forces --- Belligerency --- Military law --- Government policy. --- Protection of civilians. --- Law and legislation --- Droit humanitaire. --- Droit. --- Protection des civils. --- Legal status, laws, etc --- Soldiers - Legal status, laws, etc. --- Targeted killing - Government policy --- War - Protection of civilians
Choose an application
Existing international law is capable to govern the “war on terror” also in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. The standards generally applicable to targeted killings are those of human rights law. Force may be used in order to address immediate threats, preventive killings are permitted under strict preconditions but targeted killings are prohibited. In the context of armed conflicts, these standards are complemented by international humanitarian law as lex specialis. Civilians may only be targeted while directly taking part in hostilities and posing a threat to the adversary. Also in Israel and the Occupied Territory, these standards apply. Contrary to the Israeli Supreme Court’s view, international humanitarian law is not complemented by human rights law, but human rights law is – to some degree – complemented by international humanitarian law. According to these standards, many killings which would be legal according to the Israeli Supreme Court violate international law.
Targeted killing (International law). --- International Law --- Law, Politics & Government --- Treaties, International --- Targeted killing. --- Targeted killing (International law) --- Humanitarian law. --- Humanitarian conventions --- International humanitarian law --- Preemptive killing --- State-sponsored killing --- Targeted killing --- Law and legislation --- Law. --- Human rights. --- International humanitarian law. --- International criminal law. --- International Criminal Law. --- International Humanitarian Law, Law of Armed Conflict. --- Human Rights. --- War (International law) --- International law --- Homicide --- International Criminal Law . --- Basic rights --- Civil rights (International law) --- Human rights --- Rights, Human --- Rights of man --- Human security --- Transitional justice --- Truth commissions --- Criminal law, International --- ICL (International criminal law) --- Criminal law --- Criminal jurisdiction --- International crimes
Listing 1 - 10 of 15 | << page >> |
Sort by
|