Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Picky Eagle explains why the United States stopped annexing territory by focusing on annexation's domestic consequences, both political and normative. It describes how the US rejection of further annexations, despite its rising power, set the stage for twentieth-century efforts to outlaw conquest. In contrast to conventional accounts of a nineteenth-century shift from territorial expansion to commercial expansion, Richard Maass argues that US ambitions were selective from the start.His book is animated by twenty-three case studies, examining the decision-making of U.S. leaders facing opportunities to pursue annexation between 1775 and 1898. U.S. presidents, secretaries, and congressmen consistently worried about how absorbing new territories would affect their domestic political influence and their goals for their country. They were particularly sensitive to annexation's domestic costs where xenophobia interacted with their commitment to democracy: rather than grant political representation to a large alien population or subject it to a long-term imperial regime, they regularly avoided both of these perceived bad options by rejecting annexation. As a result, U.S. leaders often declined even profitable opportunities for territorial expansion, and they renounced the practice entirely once no desirable targets remained.In addition to offering an updated history of the foundations of US territorial expansion, The Picky Eagle adds important nuance to previous theories of great-power expansion, with implications for our understanding of US foreign policy and international relations.

Democracy --- Xenophobia --- History. --- Political aspects --- United States --- Territorial expansion --- International Relations, Diplomatic History, US History, US Foreign Policy, International Security.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In this lucid and timely new book, Jeremy Pressman demonstrates that the default use of military force on both sides of the Arab-Israeli conflict has prevented its peaceful resolution. Whether called deterrence or war, armed struggle or terrorism, the history of the conflict reveals that violence has been counterproductive. Drawing on historical evidence from the 1950s to the present, The sword is not enough pushes back against the dominant belief that military force leads to triumph while negotiations and concessions lead to defeat and further unwelcome challenges. Violence weakens the security situation, bolsters adversaries, and, especially in the case of Palestine, has sabotaged political aims. Studiously impartial and accessibly written, this book shows us that diplomacy is the only answer.

Arab-Israeli conflict. --- Political violence --- Arab-Israeli conflict. --- Conflict resolution. --- Diplomacy. --- Israel. --- Military force. --- Negotiations. --- Palestine. --- Peace. --- US foreign policy. --- War.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In The Atlantic Realists, intellectual historian Matthew Specter offers a boldly revisionist interpretation of "realism," a prevalent stance in post-WWII US foreign policy and public discourse and the dominant international relations theory during the Cold War. Challenging the common view of realism as a set of universally binding truths about international affairs, Specter argues that its major features emerged from a century-long dialogue between American and German intellectuals beginning in the late nineteenth century. Specter uncovers an "Atlantic realist" tradition of reflection on the prerogatives of empire and the nature of power politics conditioned by fin de siècle imperial competition, two world wars, the Holocaust, and the Cold War. Focusing on key figures in the evolution of realist thought, including Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and Wilhelm Grewe, this book traces the development of the realist worldview over a century, dismantling myths about the national interest, Realpolitik, and the "art" of statesmanship.

Political realism --- Balance of power --- Imperialism --- International relations --- History --- History --- History --- Philosophy. --- Germany --- United States --- Foreign relations --- Foreign relations --- American exceptionalism. --- North Atlantic. --- Realpolitik. --- US foreign policy. --- great powers. --- international relations. --- power politics. --- restraint. --- world politics.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This is a necessary and urgent read for anyone concerned about the United States' endless wars. Investigating multiple genres of popular culture alongside contemporary U.S. foreign policy and political economy, Imperial Benevolence shows that American popular culture continuously suppresses awareness of U.S. imperialism while assuming American exceptionalism and innocence. This is despite the fact that it is rarely a product of the state. Expertly coordinated essays by prominent historians and media scholars address the ways that movies and television series such as Zero Dark Thirty, The Avengers, and even The Walking Dead, as well as video games such as Call of Duty: Black Ops, have largely presented the United States as a global force for good. Popular culture, with few exceptions, has depicted the U.S. as a reluctant hegemon fiercely defending human rights and protecting or expanding democracy from the barbarians determined to destroy it.

Popular culture --- Imperialism --- History --- United States --- Foreign relations --- american exceptionalism. --- american pop culture. --- call of duty. --- contemporary us foreign policy. --- defending human rights. --- endless war. --- expanding democracy. --- global force for good. --- innocence. --- media scholars. --- movies and television. --- political economy. --- popular culture. --- product of the state. --- prominent historians. --- the avengers. --- the walking dead. --- united stats. --- us imperialism. --- video games. --- wars. --- zero dark thirty.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

During the country’s dictatorship from 1973 to 1985, Uruguayans suffered under crushing repression, which included the highest rate of political incarceration in the world. In Of Light and Struggle, Debbie Sharnak explores how activists, transnational social movements, and international policymakers collaborated and clashed in response to this era and during the country’s transition back to democratic rule.At the heart of the book is an examination of how the language and politics of human rights shifted over time as a result of conflict and convergence between local, national, and global dynamics. Sharnak examines the utility and limits of human rights language used by international NGOs, such as Amnesty International, and foreign governments, such as the Carter administration. She does so by exploring tensions between their responses to the dictatorship’s violations and the grassroots struggle for socioeconomic rights as well as new social movements around issues of race, gender, religion, and sexuality in Uruguay. Sharnak exposes how international activists used human rights language to combat repression in foreign countries, how local politicians, unionists, and students articulated more expansive social justice visions, how the military attempted to coopt human rights language for its own purposes, and how broader debates about human rights transformed the fight over citizenship in renewed democratic societies. By exploring the interplay between debates taking place in activists’ living rooms, presidential administrations, and international halls of power, Sharnak uncovers the messy and contingent process through which human rights became a powerful discourse for social change, and thus contributes to a new method for exploring the history of human rights.By looking at this pivotal period in international history, Of Light and Struggle suggests that discussions around the small country on the Río de la Plata had global implications for the possibilities and constraints of human rights well beyond Uruguay’s shores.

Human rights movements --- Human rights --- Transitional justice --- International cooperation. --- 1960s activism. --- 1973. --- 1985. --- Carter administration. --- Cold war history. --- Human rights. --- Latin America and human rights. --- Latin American history. --- NGOs. --- Transitional justice. --- US foreign policy and latin America. --- Uruguay history. --- accountability. --- blanket amnesty. --- dictatorship. --- disappearance disappeared. --- grassroots. --- military abuses. --- political prisoner. --- political repression. --- post-authoritarian. --- torture chamber of Latin America. --- transnational international history.