Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Unit cohesion (Military science) --- Finland. --- Unit cohesion.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Since 2001, Western forces have been involved in a series of major military campaigns, primarily in Iraq and Afghanistan but also in Africa. For all the sophistication of the contemporary Western way of war with its digital technologies and precision weapons, infantry soldiers have been frequently involved in close combat of an intensity which is comparable to the wars of the twentieth century. At the small unit level, combat has been as brutal as ever. Yet, in many cases, they have prevailed even when they were surprised or disadvantaged. How and why have professional Western soldiers been willing and able to fight effectively together during these campaigns ? Through a series of rich historical and ethnographic case-studies, this collection seeks to analyse the experience of combat soldiers on operations in the last decade. The book explores the motivation, training, and culture of the professional Western soldier, highlighting differences and commonalities between the troops of different nations.

UNIT COHESION (MILITARY SCIENCE) --- INFANTRY DRILL AND TACTICS

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Unit cohesion (Military science) --- United States --- Armed Forces --- Unit cohesion.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How do armies fight and what makes them victorious on the modern battlefield? The author challenges long-standing answers to this classic question by linking the fate of armies to their levels of inequality. Introducing the concept of military inequality, he demonstrates how a state's prewar choices about the citizenship status of ethnic groups within its population determine subsequent battlefield performance. Treating certain ethnic groups as second-class citizens, either by subjecting them to state-sanctioned discrimination or, worse, violence, undermines interethnic trust, fuels grievances, and leads victimized soldiers to subvert military authorities once war begins. The higher an army's inequality, the author finds, the greater its rates of desertion, side-switching, casualties, and use of coercion to force these soldiers to fight. In a sweeping historical investigation,he draws on Project Mars, a new dataset of 250 conventional wars fought since 1800, to test this argument. Project Mars breaks with prior efforts by including overlooked non-Western wars while cataloguing new patterns of inequality and wartime conduct across hundreds of belligerents. Combining historical comparisons and statistical analysis, the author also marshals evidence from nine wars, ranging from the Eastern Fronts of World War I and II to less familiar wars in Africa and Central Asia, to illustrate inequality's effects. Sounding the alarm on the dangers of inequality, this book offers important lessons about battlefield performance over two centuries - and for wars still to come.

Polemology --- DISCRIMINATION IN THE MILITARY --- UNIT COHESION (MILITARY SCIENCE) --- MILITARY READINESS --- SOCIOLOGY, MILITARY

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In 2016, the Air Force began an effort to revitalize squadrons, aimed at promoting the readiness and resilience of the force. In light of this effort, the Air Force Services Center established the UNITE Initiative and hired Community Cohesion Coordinators (C3s) across participating installations to plan programs, activities, and events that directly support unit cohesion, leveraging Force Support Squadron activities along with resources and activities in the local community. Previous research suggests that providing units with opportunities to participate in group activities could serve to improve cohesion. However, the Air Force lacks data that demonstrate a correlation between the use of these activities and expected outcomes. In this report, the authors examine this connection by conducting an initial evaluation of the UNITE Initiative. The authors accomplish this evaluation by conducting interviews with C3s and reviewing post-event feedback from C3s, units, and airmen participants to understand how the program was implemented and identify successes, limitations, and lessons learned. The authors also use two post-event surveys, completed by airmen roughly two and six weeks after participating in a UNITE event, to examine whether participation was associated with perceptions of unit cohesion.

Airmen --- Unit cohesion (Military science) --- United States. --- United States. --- United States. --- Airmen --- Unit cohesion --- Operational readiness