Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This book seeks to support social science researchers who interact with vulnerability and/or sensitivity in the context of their research. Whilst there has been some important debate about the theoretical, methodological and ethical issues of conducting research on sensitive topics, and/or with vulnerable populations, the number of scholarly publications focused solely on these topics is limited and not up to date. The book intends to fill this gap by providing various research experiences, as well as the elements that characterize them. The articles selected for this book intend, first and foremost, to stimulate reflexivity amongst the use of the concepts of sensitive topics and vulnerable groups, and to provide tools that will allow researchers to improve their research practices The book integrates several articles that explore a wide range of dilemmas that, to a certain extent, might allow the reader to access the backstage of this type of research. The reader will find here a rich and fruitful space for theoretical and empirical reflection, where several social science researchers with different backgrounds share their experiences and research paths in a rigorous and creative way.
ethics --- sensitive research --- reflexivity --- qualitative methods --- emotional risk --- qualitative method --- children --- autism spectrum disorders --- methodological challenges --- research ethics --- ethical sensibility --- stereotypes --- stereotyped reasoning --- research with children --- qualitative research --- focus groups --- social research --- visual methods --- sensitive topics --- vulnerable populations --- chronic pain --- medical anthropology --- social housing --- vulnerability --- social suffering --- good intentions --- austerity --- cognitive interviewing --- transgender identity --- survey methods --- gender identity --- sexual identity --- categorization --- disability --- ethnicity --- intersectionality --- relational ethics --- researcher vulnerability --- emotional labor --- homeless people --- maternity care --- healthcare --- doctors --- perinatal center --- suffering --- human embryo in vitro --- infertility --- shadowing --- research methodology --- CYP --- paediatric patients --- interviews --- chronic illness --- brain tumours --- child protection --- child participation --- children’s competence to consent --- parental consent --- research on violence against children --- victimisation studies
Choose an application
This book seeks to support social science researchers who interact with vulnerability and/or sensitivity in the context of their research. Whilst there has been some important debate about the theoretical, methodological and ethical issues of conducting research on sensitive topics, and/or with vulnerable populations, the number of scholarly publications focused solely on these topics is limited and not up to date. The book intends to fill this gap by providing various research experiences, as well as the elements that characterize them. The articles selected for this book intend, first and foremost, to stimulate reflexivity amongst the use of the concepts of sensitive topics and vulnerable groups, and to provide tools that will allow researchers to improve their research practices The book integrates several articles that explore a wide range of dilemmas that, to a certain extent, might allow the reader to access the backstage of this type of research. The reader will find here a rich and fruitful space for theoretical and empirical reflection, where several social science researchers with different backgrounds share their experiences and research paths in a rigorous and creative way.
Humanities --- Social interaction --- Social & cultural anthropology, ethnography --- ethics --- sensitive research --- reflexivity --- qualitative methods --- emotional risk --- qualitative method --- children --- autism spectrum disorders --- methodological challenges --- research ethics --- ethical sensibility --- stereotypes --- stereotyped reasoning --- research with children --- qualitative research --- focus groups --- social research --- visual methods --- sensitive topics --- vulnerable populations --- chronic pain --- medical anthropology --- social housing --- vulnerability --- social suffering --- good intentions --- austerity --- cognitive interviewing --- transgender identity --- survey methods --- gender identity --- sexual identity --- categorization --- disability --- ethnicity --- intersectionality --- relational ethics --- researcher vulnerability --- emotional labor --- homeless people --- maternity care --- healthcare --- doctors --- perinatal center --- suffering --- human embryo in vitro --- infertility --- shadowing --- research methodology --- CYP --- paediatric patients --- interviews --- chronic illness --- brain tumours --- child protection --- child participation --- children’s competence to consent --- parental consent --- research on violence against children --- victimisation studies --- ethics --- sensitive research --- reflexivity --- qualitative methods --- emotional risk --- qualitative method --- children --- autism spectrum disorders --- methodological challenges --- research ethics --- ethical sensibility --- stereotypes --- stereotyped reasoning --- research with children --- qualitative research --- focus groups --- social research --- visual methods --- sensitive topics --- vulnerable populations --- chronic pain --- medical anthropology --- social housing --- vulnerability --- social suffering --- good intentions --- austerity --- cognitive interviewing --- transgender identity --- survey methods --- gender identity --- sexual identity --- categorization --- disability --- ethnicity --- intersectionality --- relational ethics --- researcher vulnerability --- emotional labor --- homeless people --- maternity care --- healthcare --- doctors --- perinatal center --- suffering --- human embryo in vitro --- infertility --- shadowing --- research methodology --- CYP --- paediatric patients --- interviews --- chronic illness --- brain tumours --- child protection --- child participation --- children’s competence to consent --- parental consent --- research on violence against children --- victimisation studies
Choose an application
Nothing is more integral to democracy than voting. Most people believe that every citizen has the civic duty or moral obligation to vote, that any sincere vote is morally acceptable, and that buying, selling, or trading votes is inherently wrong. In this provocative book, Jason Brennan challenges our fundamental assumptions about voting, revealing why it is not a duty for most citizens--in fact, he argues, many people owe it to the rest of us not to vote. Bad choices at the polls can result in unjust laws, needless wars, and calamitous economic policies. Brennan shows why voters have duties to make informed decisions in the voting booth, to base their decisions on sound evidence for what will create the best possible policies, and to promote the common good rather than their own self-interest. They must vote well--or not vote at all. Brennan explains why voting is not necessarily the best way for citizens to exercise their civic duty, and why some citizens need to stay away from the polls to protect the democratic process from their uninformed, irrational, or immoral votes. In a democracy, every citizen has the right to vote. This book reveals why sometimes it's best if they don't. In a new afterword, "How to Vote Well," Brennan provides a practical guidebook for making well-informed, well-reasoned choices at the polls.
Voting --- Applied ethics. --- Ethics. --- Voting ethics. --- Polls --- Elections --- Politics, Practical --- Social choice --- Suffrage --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Agency Argument. --- Civic Virtue Argument. --- Public Goods Argument. --- abstention. --- autonomy. --- bad governance. --- bad voting. --- beneficial policies. --- causal responsibility. --- citizens. --- civic duty. --- civic virtue. --- common good. --- community volunteering. --- contemporary liberal democracies. --- deference. --- democracy. --- egoistic voting. --- epistemic justification. --- epistemic standards. --- extrapolitical conception. --- fortuitous voting. --- good governance. --- good intentions. --- good policy. --- good voting. --- government policies. --- government. --- harmful policies. --- harmful voting. --- independent judgment. --- informed decisions. --- military service. --- moral obligation. --- moral obligations. --- moral virtue. --- national interest. --- news. --- personal biases. --- political beliefs. --- political judgment. --- political movements. --- political participation. --- political parties. --- politics. --- public-spirited voting. --- self-interest. --- social order. --- social science. --- social-scientific literature. --- sound evidence. --- vote buying. --- vote commodification. --- vote selling. --- voters. --- voting ethics. --- voting rights. --- voting. --- welfare. --- Balloting --- Democracy --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Voting - Moral and ethical aspects
Choose an application
This book seeks to support social science researchers who interact with vulnerability and/or sensitivity in the context of their research. Whilst there has been some important debate about the theoretical, methodological and ethical issues of conducting research on sensitive topics, and/or with vulnerable populations, the number of scholarly publications focused solely on these topics is limited and not up to date. The book intends to fill this gap by providing various research experiences, as well as the elements that characterize them. The articles selected for this book intend, first and foremost, to stimulate reflexivity amongst the use of the concepts of sensitive topics and vulnerable groups, and to provide tools that will allow researchers to improve their research practices The book integrates several articles that explore a wide range of dilemmas that, to a certain extent, might allow the reader to access the backstage of this type of research. The reader will find here a rich and fruitful space for theoretical and empirical reflection, where several social science researchers with different backgrounds share their experiences and research paths in a rigorous and creative way.
Humanities --- Social interaction --- Social & cultural anthropology, ethnography --- ethics --- sensitive research --- reflexivity --- qualitative methods --- emotional risk --- qualitative method --- children --- autism spectrum disorders --- methodological challenges --- research ethics --- ethical sensibility --- stereotypes --- stereotyped reasoning --- research with children --- qualitative research --- focus groups --- social research --- visual methods --- sensitive topics --- vulnerable populations --- chronic pain --- medical anthropology --- social housing --- vulnerability --- social suffering --- good intentions --- austerity --- cognitive interviewing --- transgender identity --- survey methods --- gender identity --- sexual identity --- categorization --- disability --- ethnicity --- intersectionality --- relational ethics --- researcher vulnerability --- emotional labor --- homeless people --- maternity care --- healthcare --- doctors --- perinatal center --- suffering --- human embryo in vitro --- infertility --- shadowing --- research methodology --- CYP --- paediatric patients --- interviews --- chronic illness --- brain tumours --- child protection --- child participation --- children’s competence to consent --- parental consent --- research on violence against children --- victimisation studies
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|