Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This open access book provides the first explicit case study for an application of the method of reflective equilibrium (RE), using it to develop and defend a precautionary principle. It thereby makes an important and original contribution to questions of philosophical method and methodology. The book shows step-by-step how RE is applied, and develops a methodological framework which will be useful for everyone who wishes to use reflective equilibrium. With respect to precautionary principles, the book demonstrates how a rights-based precautionary principle can be constructed and defended. The case study succeeds in demonstrating that RE can be successfully applied and puts real constraints on the justification process. This is all the more remarkable as the case study was designed as an open-ended process, without presupposing any specific results. This book will be highly relevant both to people interested in philosophical methodology and epistemology, as well as to researchers who are interested in using philosophical methods and tools and applying them to practical problems.

Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge --- Ethics & moral philosophy --- Philosophy --- Reflective Equilibrium --- Precautionary Principle --- Applying Reflective Equilibrium --- Philosophical Method --- Methodology of Ethics --- Moral Justification --- Applied Ethics --- Climate Ethics --- Decisions under uncertainty --- Uncertain harm --- Method and applications of Reflective Equilibrium --- Developing a Candidate System --- Process of Adjustments --- Reaching a State of Reflective Equilibrium --- Toolbox for Applying Reflective Equilibrium --- Elgin and reflective equilibrium --- Baumberger and reflective equilibrium --- Brun and reflective equilibrium --- Logic. --- Knowledge, Theory of. --- Critical thinking.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Scholars in the "Critical Legal Studies" movement have challenged some of the most cherished ideals of modern Western legal and political thought. CLS thinkers claim that the rule of law is a myth and that its defense by liberal thinkers is riddled with inconsistencies. This first book-length liberal reply to CLS systematically examines the philosophical underpinnings of the CLS movement and exposes the deficiencies in the major lines of CLS argument against liberalism.

Aristotle, on rule of law. --- Bingham, Joseph. --- Blackmun, Harry. --- Brest, Paul. --- Brosnan, Donald. --- Cardozo, Benjamin. --- Constant, Benjamin. --- Edgerton, Robert. --- Ewald, William. --- Foucault, Michel. --- Frank, Jerome. --- Freeman, Alan. --- Greenawalt, Kent. --- Harries, Karsten. --- Herzog, Don. --- Humboldt, Wilhelm von. --- Hunt, Alan. --- Kierkegaard, Soren. --- Kirchheimer, Otto. --- Marxism. --- Nietzsche, Friedrich. --- abortion. --- altruism. --- anti-Semitism. --- antinomianism. --- community. --- deconstructionism. --- due process. --- duty to aid a stranger. --- epistemological neutrality. --- equal protection doctrine. --- equality under law. --- fair notice. --- fetishism. --- functionalism. --- individualism. --- informalism. --- iron law of oligarchy. --- law-and-society movement. --- legal accountability. --- legal formalism. --- legal realism. --- moral truth. --- nation-state. --- order, problem of. --- plain meaning, theory of. --- political neutrality. --- radical indeterminacy. --- reflective equilibrium. --- rule conception of society. --- rule of recognition.